## Why fsolve don't solve this system ?...

Hello all,

I try to solve this system using maple 18 by "fsolve", but I don't get the solution, I don't Know what is the problem or What this mean.

Do you have any idea?

Best Regards L.Sn=10_R=23.5.mw

## fsolve doesnt work for many unknowns ...

Hey there,

I am using the fsolve command in order to solve numerically a system of equations with N equations and N unknowns. According to my discretization the number of equations changes. If I have a small number of equations it all works out perfectly. But if I increase the number of equations I just get something like that:

Sorry, for the long post, but for a small number of unknowns Ai it works. It seems that maple doesnt try to compute? Has anyone encountered the same problems?

Any help is appreciated.

Jens

## How does Maple determine the interval for function...

In functions such as fsolve, there is an optional parameter that allows one to specify the interval to perform the function on. Additionally, sometimes, if a solution is left out, one can specify an interval to search on to obtain the missing solution.

How does Maple determine the interval to search on if this is not specified?

Ultimately, I am asking this question because I have a function for Newton's method; however, it requires an interval to run. I have read that fsolve uses Newton's method, so I am curious how to automatically select such an interval. Does anyone know how to implement such a thing?

## What method(s) is used in fsolve (in Maple)?...

I am curious about the numerical method(s) used by Maple to calculate fsolve. I've looked at the documentation (https://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/maple/view.aspx?path=fsolve%2fdetails), but the method(s) used are not stated on there. Does anyone know which method Maple uses in fsolve? Additionally, does Maple use multiple methods and if so, how does it determine which one to use? Thanks!

## The fsolve command fails, solve doesn't...

Hi Maple community

I'm running an algorithm where a non-linear equation system must be solved, in this case is a 26x26 system.

After 16116 succesful previous computations, fsolve stops giving me results.
I checked why and I was first expecting that, for some reason, the 26x26 system had an error and I ended with something like 25x26 or vice versa. But that was not the case.

So I tried the command solve and it not only worked fine but also gave me two results, but I only need one. I guess I could check for the wrong solution and discard it, but I still wondering why fsolve is failing and if there is anything to help fsolve not to fail.

These are the set of equations if somebody wants to check them:

EQ[16117][1] := W[1, 16117]*(-0.3860115660e-1*HRa[1, 16117]-0.1876793978e-1*ga[1, 16117]+0.7836678184e-1) = 2.040147478*10^6*SR[1, 16118], W[1, 16117]*(-0.3915554290e-1*HRa[1, 16117]-0.1903748329e-1*ga[1, 16117]+0.8260795999e-1) = 3.876387504, W[1, 16117]*(-0.1876794098e-1*HRa[1, 16117]-0.9892449327e-2*ga[1, 16117]+0.3810204607e-1) = 2.040147478*10^6*v[1, 16118], HLa[1, 16117] = .9724029753*ga[1, 16117]+HRa[1, 16117], NRa[1, 16117] = 0.7006679273e-1*HRa[1, 16117]-.1803623678*ga[1, 16117]+1.002451672, NLa[1, 16117] = 0.7006679273e-1*HRa[1, 16117]+.2484955248*ga[1, 16117]+1.002451672, SL[2, 16118] = SR[1, 16118], fra[1, 16117] = HRa[1, 16117]-HLa[2, 16117], fra[1, 16117] = .25*NRa[1, 16117]+.25*NLa[2, 16117], ga[1, 16117] = 0.;

EQ[16117][2] := W[2, 16117]*(-0.3860115660e-1*HRa[2, 16117]-0.1876793978e-1*ga[2, 16117]+0.7836678184e-1) = -2.040147478*10^6*SL[2, 16118]+7.152482840, W[2, 16117]*(-0.3915554290e-1*HRa[2, 16117]-0.1903748329e-1*ga[2, 16117]+0.8260795999e-1) = 3.876387504, W[2, 16117]*(-0.1876794098e-1*HRa[2, 16117]-0.9892449327e-2*ga[2, 16117]+0.3810204607e-1) = -1.983845478*10^6*SL[2, 16118]+5.221405977, HLa[2, 16117] = .9724029753*ga[2, 16117]+HRa[2, 16117], NRa[2, 16117] = 0.7006679273e-1*HRa[2, 16117]-.1803623678*ga[2, 16117]+1.002451672, NLa[2, 16117] = 0.7006679273e-1*HRa[2, 16117]+.2484955248*ga[2, 16117]+1.002451672, SL[3, 16118] = 0.3505865589e-5, fra[2, 16117] = HRa[2, 16117]-HLa[3, 16117];

EQ[16117][3] := W[3, 16117]*(-0.3860115660e-1*HRa[3, 16117]-0.1876793978e-1*ga[3, 16117]+0.7836678184e-1) = -2.040147478*10^6*SL[3, 16118]+10.82168541, W[3, 16117]*(-0.3915554290e-1*HRa[3, 16117]-0.1903748329e-1*ga[3, 16117]+0.8260795999e-1) = 3.876387504, W[3, 16117]*(-0.1876794098e-1*HRa[3, 16117]-0.9892449327e-2*ga[3, 16117]+0.3810204607e-1) = -1.983845478*10^6*SL[3, 16118]+8.751240594, HLa[3, 16117] = .9724029753*ga[3, 16117]+HRa[3, 16117], NRa[3, 16117] = 0.7006679273e-1*HRa[3, 16117]-.1803623678*ga[3, 16117]+1.002451672, NLa[3, 16117] = 0.7006679273e-1*HRa[3, 16117]+.2484955248*ga[3, 16117]+1.002451672, SL[4, 16118] = 0.5304364281e-5, fra[3, 16117] = HRa[3, 16117];

And after these the solving command that I used was:

SOL[j]:=fsolve({seq(EQ[j][n],n=1..N)},indets({entries(EQ[j],nolist)},assignable(name)));

Which returns

SOL[j]:=

As I said, then I tried the solve command:

SOL[j]:=solve({seq(EQ[j][n],n=1..N)},indets({entries(EQ[j],nolist)},assignable(name)));

which returns:

SOL[16117] :=

{HLa[1, 16117] = 1.011251860, HLa[2, 16117] = .5007913055, HLa[3, 16117] = -0.4240068535e-1, HRa[1, 16117] = 1.011251860, HRa[2, 16117] = .8728245835, HRa[3, 16117] = .2686716410, NLa[1, 16117] = 1.073306847, NLa[2, 16117] = .9685353734, NLa[3, 16117] = .9417827567, NRa[1, 16117] = 1.073306847, NRa[2, 16117] = 1.132612831, NRa[3, 16117] = 1.078974668, SL[2, 16118] = 0.1737463747e-5, SL[3, 16118] = 0.3505865589e-5, SL[4, 16118] = 0.5304364281e-5, SR[1, 16118] = 0.1737463747e-5, W[1, 16117] = 90.12372195, W[2, 16117] = 69.57451714, W[3, 16117] = 49.58407210, fra[1, 16117] = .5104605550, fra[2, 16117] = .9152252689, fra[3, 16117] = .2686716410, ga[1, 16117] = 0., ga[2, 16117] = -.3825916698, ga[3, 16117] = -.3199006320, v[1, 16118] = 8.447574110*10^(-7)},

{HLa[1, 16117] = 3.043461992, HLa[2, 16117] = 2.386862361, HLa[3, 16117] = -0.4240068535e-1, HRa[1, 16117] = 3.043461992, HRa[2, 16117] = 1.087485894, HRa[3, 16117] = .2686716410, NLa[1, 16117] = 1.215697293, NLa[2, 16117] = 1.410701230, NLa[3, 16117] = .9417827567, NRa[1, 16117] = 1.215697293, NRa[2, 16117] = .8376385519, NRa[3, 16117] = 1.078974668, SL[2, 16118] = 0.2032780481e-5, SL[3, 16118] = 0.3505865589e-5, SL[4, 16118] = 0.5304364281e-5, SR[1, 16118] = 0.2032780481e-5, W[1, 16117] = -106.0268094, W[2, 16117] = 265.7250566, W[3, 16117] = 49.58407210, fra[1, 16117] = .6565996307, fra[2, 16117] = 1.129886580, fra[3, 16117] = .2686716410, ga[1, 16117] = 0., ga[2, 16117] = 1.336253076, ga[3, 16117] = -.3199006320, v[1, 16118] = 9.883410782*10^(-7)}

Thanks in advance for any recommendations and suggestions.

## How to find root for equation with 'w'?...

Here, I attached my maple code. I need to find root. I am using fsolve. But I am not geting the root. Please any one help me... to find the root.

 >
 >
 (1)
 >
 (2)
 >
 (3)
 >
 (4)
 >
 (5)
 >
 (6)
 >
 (7)
 >
 (8)
 >
 (9)
 >
 (10)
 >
 (11)
 >
 (12)
 >
 (13)
 >
 (14)
 >
 (15)
 >
 (16)
 >
 (17)
 >
 (18)
 >
 (19)
 >
 (20)
 >
 (21)
 >
 (22)
 >
 (23)
 >
 (24)
 >
 (25)
 >
 (26)
 >
 (27)
 >
 (28)
 >
 (29)
 >
 (30)
 >
 (31)
 >
 (32)
 >
 (33)
 >
 (34)
 >
 (35)
 >
 (36)
 >
 (37)
 >
 (38)
 >
 >
 (39)
 >

## Numeric solution of complex system...

Hi, I have the equations (below) with different parameters. I'd like to find out if is it possitble to:

(1) Create a loop that solves for values of on of the parameters, T, in the interval -0.3<T<0.3 and obtain the solutions allowing for a grid of 0.01.

That is, if one can first solve for T= -0.3 and then use the loop with increments that raise T by 0.01 each time until T=0.3. Other parameters are held constant at their assigned values.

(2) Generates the corresponding vectors for T and all the endogenous variables.

eq1 := PI_T = alpha*M*(kappa/(1+kappa-sigma)-1):
eq2 := l = alpha*((sigma-1)*kappa/(1+kappa-sigma)+1):
eq3 := M = phi_c^(-kappa)*F:
eq4 := e*F = PI_T*v+T:
eq5 := M*l+L_A = L_s:
eq6 := F*e+A = A_s:
eq7 := A = (1-beta)*(L_s+(1-v)*PI_T-T):
eq8 := A_s = L_A:
eq9 := p = sigma/((sigma-1)*phi):
eq10 := P_Y = M^(lambda/(1-sigma))*p:
eq11 := L_s = N*(theta*P_Y^beta)^(-1/delta):
eq12 := phi = (kappa/(1+kappa-sigma))^(1/(sigma-1))*phi_c:
eq13 := U = delta*theta*L_s/((1+delta)*P_Y^beta)+((1-v)*PI_T-T)/P_Y^beta:

Params:= [ T=0, N = 1, v = 1, beta = .75, lambda = 1, sigma = 5, kappa = 4.8, delta = 2, theta = 2.591350635, alpha = 0.3998699153e-1, e = 0.8333333332e-1]:

Init_Values:= {A_s = .2500000000, l = .9996747882, PI_T = 0.8333333332e-1, L_A = .2500000000, phi = 1.878101496, M = .4168022157, A = .1666666667, p = .6655657336, P_Y = .8283396488, L_s = 2/3, phi_c = 1.2, F = 1, U = 1.326439132 }:

SOL:= fsolve(eval({eq||(1..13)}, Params), Init_Values);

Many thanks!!

## Problem with solving...

I am trying to find the root of an equation. The problem is, I keep getting the error

"Error, (in fsolve) Can't handle expressions with typed procedures"

and

Warning, solutions may have been lost

whenever I try to solve it. Anyone have any ideas? My worksheet is here:  1.mw

## How to solve it?...

hi.i am a problem for solving this non linear algebric equation.

## Roots of exp(z) = -1...

Dear all,

I have a question: how to compute the roots of exp(z) = -1 with z in C?

I tried:

fsolve( exp(z) = -1, z, complex );

But it only gives one root (0.1671148658e-3+4.934802220*10^9*I) which does not even seem to be correct. I would prefere smth like z_n = I*(2*n-1)*pi or at least multiple roots...

By using

solve(exp(x) = -1, x);

it returns I*Pi.

MATLAB MuPAD gives the desired result:

solve(exp(x) = -1, x)

(PI*I + 2*PI*k*I, k in Z)

Thanks!

## Solve with fsolve...

How I can solve it ? If I want a solution dependent of a. With fsolve? But how?

-x3+ax2-lnx=0

## Equation with parametric integral ...

I want to solve one equation with one variable and the variable is also in definite integral delimiter. When trying fsolve, I get the error:

"Error, (in fsolve) Can't handle expressions with typed procedures"

Here is worksheet.mw

How can I obtain solution with method other from simple manual testing Te values?

## How to solve algebraic equations?...

solve or fsolve dos not any answer?

i think use Newton  Raphson, because solve or fsolve not work.

thankscomparision.mw

 (1)

 (2)

 (3)

 (4)

 (5)

 (6)

 (7)

 (8)

## Problem with peak positions...

I have written a code which generates a Gaussian like curve as a set of points and have written some basic commands to find several important quantities from the plot. The three of importance here are the peak position, peak height and Full Width at Half Maximum.

See the attached minimal working example maple worksheet.

It can find the peak position and the peak height no problem, but another quantity I want it to find is the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM). I use the aforementioned calculated values to find the left and right components of the FWHM but the fsolve command just hangs.

In the worksheet this is not evident but in the much longer full code which I run through the terminal and prints the values to a file, it begins the fsolve command and reaches a particular value and it just hangs. No amount of waiting time makes it continue the calculation.

However if I use an approximate integration scheme (such as Riemann sums) then the fsolve part executed perfectly. fslove seems to get stuck during the numerical integration step.

There is probably an easy answer to this problem which I am missing. Any help is appreciated.

fsolve_numerical_integration.mw

- Yeti

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Last Page 3 of 13
﻿