Integral with lower limit close to zero ...

Hi,

I want to solve the integral with respect to Gamma function but I can not obtain it by maple. the lower limit "a" is very close to zero. Please direct me. Thank you

by:

Missing accents...

Dear Maple community,

I just recently purchased Maple 2016.2 Student Edition for my bachelor thesis and ran into an issue I was unable to resolve myself, maybe I didn't find the right English search terms..?

I need to use a small greek gamma with a horizontal bar above it. I know how to use accents, though, in output the bar is missing and this seems to apply for gamma ONLY. Is it just me or is it a bug maybe? I used exactly the same procedure to enter all variables.

The same problem returns when I try to add gamma to a plot label, so I think it's somehow connected.

From what I gathered so far, maybe it's possible to work around by editing some sort of Maple source code..? But I wouldn't know how to do that, so any help would be very much appreciated!

Thanks in advance and best regards from Germany

Claudio

How to solve transcendental equation exactly?...

I mean the root of the equation

GAMMA(n-1/n)*GAMMA(1/n)/(n*GAMMA(n)) = 1

belonging to RealRange(Open(1),4). It should be noticed there are solutions outside this interval. Here is my try.

 (1)

 (2)

Also

 (3)

There is a substitute

 (4)

 (5)

There is a shade of hope that GAMMA(n-1/n)*GAMMA(1/n)/(n*GAMMA(n))  can be simplified.

PS. An SCR was submitted by me.

Problem with gamma as variable...

 (1)

 (2)

 (3)

 (4)

 (5)

 (6)

how can i solve this problem?

it possible teach maple not simplify some values...

hi  for example to calculate the following

residue((Psi(-z)+Eulergamma)^2*h(z), z = 2)

gives

3*h(2)+(D(h))(2)

but it possible to write

as( Psi(2)+Eulergamma(z))*h(2)+(D(h))(2)

so that

and Psi(z)+Eulergamma== harmonicNumber(z-1)

the result must be

harmonicNumber(2)*h(2)+(D(h))(2)

it is possible that Maple gives explit form of the values function avoid to calculate automatic.

thanks

How can I fixed the error in maple when I use Meij...

Hi

I call the MeijerG function in the matlab: MeijerG([[-.3], []], [[.8, 1.3, -.8, -.3, -1.3], []], 1.), and it return an error as follows:

Error, (in evalf/MeijerG) the function is not defined: corresponding GAMMA poles must not coincide.

But when I change the first parameter from -0.3 to -1.3, I can get the result.

So, can you help to explain it? how can I fixed it?

Dirac Algebra using the Physics Package...

Hi,

I'm trying to set up the dirac algebra using the Physics package in maple 18. There are dirac gamma matricies (Dgamma) already specified, but I can't seem to manipulate their commutation relations.

So I've tried building my own:

restart;
with(Physics);

Setup(noncommutativeprefix = {gamma});

g[1] := gamma[1]; g[2] := gamma[2]; g[3] := gamma[3]; g[4] := gamma[0];

InverseMetric := rhs(g_[`~mu`, `~nu`, matrix])

Algebra :=  (a, b) -> %AntiCommutator(g[a], g[b]) = 2*InverseMetric[a, b];

Rules := Matrix(4, 4, Algebra);

Setup(algebrarules = Rules);

Error, (in Physics:-Setup) unable to set AntiCommutator(gamma[0], gamma[1]) = 0 because, taking into account {AntiCommutator(gamma[0], gamma[0]) = 2}, we would have gamma[0] and gamma[0] anticommutative and AntiCommutator(gamma[0], gamma[0]) <> 0

It seems like Maple can't handle the Dirac Algebra? Or have I done something obviously wrong?

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks

Representation in Gamma function...

AOA... Dear when i expand

sum(sum(binomial(n-1, i)*x^(n-i-alpha)*(-a*n)^i*c[n]*GAMMA(n-i+1)/GAMMA(n-i-alpha+1), i = 0 .. n-1), n = ceil(alpha) .. M)

for M=2 and alpha=1/2 its answer is

-sqrt(x)*c[1]*sqrt(-(1-x)/x)*(2*x-1)/(sqrt(Pi)*(1-x))-(1/4)*c[1]*hypergeom([3/2, 2], [3], 1/x)/(x*sqrt(x*Pi))-(4/3)*x^(3/2)*c[2]*(-(2-x)/x)^(3/2)*(2*x-1)/(sqrt(Pi)*(2-x))+(2/3)*c[2]*hypergeom([3/2, 2], [4], 2/x)/(x*sqrt(x*Pi))

which is very difficulty i want its answer in Gamma form i.e.

2*sqrt(x)*c[1]/sqrt(Pi)+(8/3)*x^(3/2)*c[2]/sqrt(Pi)-4*sqrt(x)*c[2]/sqrt(Pi)

Pl help me

desactivate gamma constant or Euler constant...

Hello,

I use Maple to solve dynamics of multibody systems. In the mechanical system i study, all my kinematic schemes use the parameter gamma and the project i work on, many people use the parameter gamma.

The issue is that i use the parameter gamma(t) depending of the time and if i use this parameter Maple treat this parameter as the Euler constant gamma and consequently make bad simplifications.

Is it possible to add a code lign to desactivate this...

Unprotect This, Unprotect That...

Maple has a number of protected names that cannot be redefined without some work.

A common request is to use the letter j or J instead of the default I for the imaginary unit. Also common is to be able to use the letter I as an ordinary variable, rather than as an imaginary unit. For this, there is a very convenient interface command.

restart;

(-1)^(1/2);

I

interface(imaginaryunit=J):
(-1)^(1/2);

J

(There...

 Page 1 of 1
﻿