Paras31

240 Reputation

9 Badges

2 years, 20 days
Agricultural University of Athens
PhD Candidate

Social Networks and Content at Maplesoft.com

Teacher of Mathematics with a proven track record of working in education management. Proficient in Ease of Adaptation, Course Design, and Instructional Technology. Holds a Bachelor's degree in Mathematics from the University of the Aegean and a Master's in Applied Mathematics at the Hellenic Open University, focusing on Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations. His enthusiasm lies in the application of mathematical models to real-world contexts, such as epidemiology and population growth. Aside from his passion for teaching, Athanasios enjoys football, basketball, and spending time with his dogs.

MaplePrimes Activity


These are questions asked by Paras31

In the transformation w = e^z, vertical lines in the complex z-plane of the form Re(z)=a are mapped to circles of radius e^a in the w-plane.

Can I create a Maple visualization that does the following:

  1. Displays the result side by side, showing each vertical line in the z-plane and its corresponding mapped circle in the w-plane.

  2. Does it use a different color and style for each line and its image (e.g., dashed, dotted, solid, or different colors)?

restart; interface(imaginaryunit = 'i')

z := 2+2*I

2+2*I

(1)

with(plots); point1 := pointplot([[Re(z), Im(z)]], symbol = solidcircle, color = blue, axes = normal, labels = ["Re(z)", "Im(z)"], title = "Complex Number Plot")

 

mod_z := abs(z)

2*2^(1/2)

(2)

vector1 := arrow([0, 0], [Re(z), Im(z)], color = red, shape = double_arrow, width = 0.5e-1, border = false, head_width = .1, head_length = .1); vector2 := arrow([0, 0], [0, Im(z)], color = green, shape = double_arrow, width = 0.5e-1, border = false, head_width = .1, head_length = .1); vector3 := arrow([0, 0], [Re(z), 0], color = yellow, shape = double_arrow, width = 0.5e-1, border = false, head_width = .1, head_length = .1)

display([vector1, point1, vector2, vector3], axes = normal, labels = ["Re(z)", "Im(z)"], view = [0 .. 3, -1 .. 4], scaling = constrained, title = "Modulus of complex number")

 

w := 2+3*I

2+3*I

(3)

z+w

4+5*I

(4)

z-w

-I

(5)

z.w

-2+10*I

(6)

z/w

10/13-(2/13)*I

(7)

restart

with(plots); a := 2; complexplot(a+I*t, t = -Pi .. Pi, title = "Vertical Line Re(z)=2")

 

A := [-3, -1, 0, 1, 2]; P := [seq(complexplot(x+I*y, y = -10 .. 10, color = red), `in`(x, A))]; display(P, title = "Multiple Vertical Lines in Complex Plane")

 

with(plots); B := [-3, -1, 0, 1, 2]; H := [seq(complexplot(x+I*y, x = -10 .. 10, color = blue), `in`(y, B))]; display(H, title = "Multiple Horizontal Lines in Complex Plane")

 
 

NULL

Download operations.mw

I am studying the Julia sets. I have tried the following two codes to generate Julia Sets. The first one I found in Maple Help, and the second one from http://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/maple/mfrjulfn.htm. I am wondering if there exists another code to generate the Julia set. My question is just for educational purposes, because those two codes work fine.
 

with(Fractals:-EscapeTime); with(ImageTools); bl, ur := -2.0-1.5*I, 2.0+1.5*I; c := -1; J := Julia(700, bl, ur, c, cutoff = 4, iterationlimit = 6000, output = layer1); Embed(J)

restart; julfn_zsqrd := proc (x, y) local c, z, m; c := evalf(0); z := evalf(x+I*y); for m from 0 to 50 while abs(z) < 2 do z := -z^2+z end do; m end proc; plot3d(0, -1.0 .. 2.0, -2.0 .. 2.0, style = patchnogrid, orientation = [-90, 0], grid = [250, 250], scaling = constrained, color = julfn_zsqrd)

 

NULL


 

Download Julia_Sets.mw

I was reading a book on complex analysis, and I tried to answer some questions like "Find and plot the sixth roots of unity on Maple."  I tried the following code, which works. Is there any other way to solve and plot the same question?

with(plots); interface(imaginaryunit = 'I'); s := [seq(exp(2*I*Pi*k*(1/6)), k = 0 .. 5)]; X := [seq(Re(s[k]), k = 1 .. 6)]; Y := [seq(Im(s[k]), k = 1 .. 6)]

[1, 1/2+((1/2)*I)*3^(1/2), -1/2+((1/2)*I)*3^(1/2), -1, -1/2-((1/2)*I)*3^(1/2), 1/2-((1/2)*I)*3^(1/2)]

 

[1, 1/2, -1/2, -1, -1/2, 1/2]

 

[0, (1/2)*3^(1/2), (1/2)*3^(1/2), 0, -(1/2)*3^(1/2), -(1/2)*3^(1/2)]

(1)

UnitCircle := plot([cos(t), sin(t), t = 0 .. 2*Pi], color = gray, linestyle = dash); RootsPlot := pointplot([X, Y], symbol = solidcircle, color = blue, symbolsize = 10); display(UnitCircle, RootsPlot, scaling = constrained, title = "6th Roots of Unity")

 

NULL


 

Download 6th_roots_of_unity.mw

All three expressions define the same initial velocity condition in different notations.
ic1 := u(x, 0) = f, D[2](u)(x, 0) = g
ic2 := u(x, 0) = f, diff(u(x, 0), t) = g;
ic3 := u(x, 0) = f, u__t(x, 0) = g;  

Why does only ic1 work while ic2 and ic3 do not? Should I use another way?

wave_equation_1D.mw

Hi everyone,

I am trying to visualize the integral of x3 over the interval x=−1 to x=1. I tried using:

with(plots):
display(
   plot(x^3, x = -1 .. 1, color = black, thickness = 2),
   shadebetween(x^3, 0, x = -1 .. 1, color = cyan)
);

This works, but I wondered if there’s a better or more elegant way to visualize definite integrals. For example:

  • Can I add transparency to the shaded region?
  • Is there a built-in function that directly plots definite integrals with shading?
  • Any tips for improving the aesthetics of such plots?

Thanks in advance for any help!

Download εμβαδόν_χωρίου.mw

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Page 2 of 7