Usually maple returns the behaviour about the expansion point, but now I get a series in terms of weird powers...

I think the behaviour is logarithmic, but thats not what maple reproduces.

What results in this behaviour of maple?

limitxkl.mw

Download limitxkl.mw

I am trying to use Maple17 to create practice integration problems in which the integrands contain square roots.  I want the students to practice converting square roots, perhaps with fractions, to fractional and/or negative powers.  Hopefully Maple can typeset the integrals if I use the inert form "Int", and also do the integrals for me so I can find the answers quicker than doing it by hand, and not have to worry about making a careless mistake.  The trouble is, Maple is converting the square roots to fractional exponents:

Download DisplaySquareRoot.

Download DisplaySquareRoot.mw

I hope at least one of these works.  To make a long story short, when I display an integral using "Int", how do I prevent Maple from converting square roots to fractional exponents?

GS

Good morning sir.

I request your kind support to the above cited question.

With thanks & Regards

M.Anand

Assistant Professor in Mathematics

SR International Institute of Technology,

Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.

i have a piecewise like " g "

g := piecewise(0 <= t and t <= 0.2e-1, 122.63, 0.2e-1 < t and t < .287, 0, .287 <= t and t <= .307, 122.63, .307 < t and t < .335, 0); plot(g, t = 0 .. .335)

this function is semi periodic just for 10 times consecutive . i want to define it

example     k=[g g g g g g g g g g  g ] or somthing like that.

1.mw 

i want to plot fft form of final piecewise function

and then filter it . and plot them.

I recently installed Maple 17 from my university and greek letters do not work. For instance if I type alpha or any other greek letter, Maple just outputs a capital A in a box. I still have Maple 15 installed and it works on there and all the preferences seem the same.

Thanks

I have 2nd order nonlinear ode I try to solve with Runge Kutta 4th order method in maple but all I get from the outcome was 1 and 0.This is the equation:theta_ode1.mw . How do I do it Or how do I write the code to solve it with maple using  Runge Kutta 4th order method?

I have 2nd order nonlinear ode I try to solve with Runge Kutta 4th order method in maple but all I get from the out is 1 and 0.This is the equation: theta_ode.mw . How do I do it Or how do I write the code to solve it with maple using  Runge Kutta 4th order method?

diff(sin(x)^2,x$n); # Maple fails

# then I tried:

combine(sin(x)^2);diff(%,x$n);

# this works, but Maple should drop the pochhammer term (derivation of a constant)

What is the reasoning behind the output?

I am trying to use Maple to produce an image that will be part of a math paper.  The final image must be in .eps format.  Whenever I produce a plot in Maple17 and click on it, it looks like the image has the shape of a square (regardless of what's inside it), perhaps with a lot of empty space.  I want an image without a lot of empty space, and I'd like Maple to do this.  If I crop a square image using some other application, it is not going to improve the quality of the image and might hurt it.  

If the answer to question in the Title is "no", can anyone suggest a good way to produce a good .eps image from a Maple plot that is cropped properly to eliminate as much empty space as possible?  I have Photoshop, but I don't know if this is the best way to go.

I wrote a toy file that plots a simple curve.  I'll upload it and provide a link to it.  If you execute the code and click on the image, you'll see that it is a square with a lot of empty space.

Nov122013.mw

Download Nov122013.mw

Can any workarounds in Maple for debugging the code without procedure? 

Good morning to all our Mapleprimes members.

It is very helpful to many persons who are very passion and dedicated to teach Mathematics using Maple technology if the software package is loaded with updated maple procedures of all the topics.

I am being of them, request the technical authorities and the eminant professors to support and develop this requirement.It becomes an open door to many people to enter and aquire the immence knowledge in Maple.

With thanks & Regards

M.Anand

Assistant Professor in Mathematics

SR International Institute of Technology,

Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.

Good morning sir.

I request your kind support to the above cited question.

With thanks & Regards

M.Anand

Assistant Professor in Mathematics

SR International Institute of Technology,

Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.

Dear All,

please help me with my problem. i have quite a big program all parts of which are distributed in the several code edit regions and in the main text. i'd like to find all occurenses of gven text in all open documents including code edit regions. i know how to do it manually by openening each code edit regiong and pressing Ctrl-F. however it is very time consuming and defocuses me apart from my main tasks. i'd prefer to use some combinations of 'hot keys' on the keybord or one or two mouse clicks as for example in MS Visual Studio.  

I am creating a plot in Maple17 which will include many line segments and polygons.  I want the axes to be equally scaled, so that line segments that are perpendicular actually look perpendicular.  When I view what I have created so far, line segments that are perpendicular do not appear to be so in a plot, even though I used the "scaling=constrained" option several times.  I created a stripped-down file that isolates the problem.  Here it is:

Download perp.mw

An angle that should be a right angle looks obtuse in the plot.  I used "scaling=constrained" in both the "display" command and the "segp" procedure.  I am using "polygonplot" to plot line segments (degenerate polygons) because the final plot will contain genuine polygons and this seemed like the easiest way to do it.  If this is a bad idea for some reason I can change it.

GS

so would anybody know how to write a function that checks whether two line segments intersect?  each line segment is given a list [[a,b],[x,y]] , of 2 lists with 2 numbers in each.   

it should return  "True" if ∃s,t ∈ [0,t] : sa+(1-s)b =tx+(1-t)y ,  else"False"

 I haven't a clue so any help would be appreciated,

thanks in advance.