I have encountered the situation frequently where I want to simplify an equation by cancelling out terms on both sides.  I have tried simplify() with a variety of assumptions(J,L>0,etc) and I haven't been able to get it to work.  On a simple equation, one can use 'solve' however there are situations where solve doesn't work and I just want to simplify the equation not solve it.

The script below shows the situation.  I cancel out JL and the complex exponential by manually identifying that they are common factors.  Is there an automatic way of doing this type of simplification?

If I use expand() it clearly shows the common factors on both sides but I haven't found the command that removes any common terms.

Download common_factors.mw

How can I expand the series in multi-variable, where all variable tends to infinity.

Suppose I have a function F(x,y,z) and I want the series of F in all three variable at {x=Infinity, y=infinity, z=infinity} 

Does MAPLE have capabability to do multidimensional FTs i.e. (x,y)->(u,v)? If not, are there any links to MAPLE packages which meet this requirement that can be recommended?

Melvin Brown

I used thread for a loop and found that it takes more time than evalf. Please help to decrease the computational cost. Thank you.

thread_mp.mw

Consider the finite field G:=GF(p,k) for some prime p and a positive integer k. Let H be an nxm matrix over G.

My question: How to obtain the minimum number of linearly dependent columns of the H over G. 

Thanks in advance  

-Can we solve symbolically matrix equations where the matrices are ungiven by MAPLE?

For a simple example;

Let A.B+2B=C.

where A nxn is matrix and B, C and nx1 matrices. (all matrices are ungiven)

Question: Find symbolically matrix B in terms of C and A?

My try:

We can quickly calculate Matrix B by hand.  We have (A+2I)B=C and so B=(A+2I)^(-1).C   ( where (A+2I) is invertible and I is nxn identity matrix)

Briefly: Can we do for the more complex and difficult equations by MAPLE? 

Hello, i wish to get dot displayed for time derivative and prime displayed for space derivative. I put typesetting in extended mode but it seems to only work for variable that depend only of time. So how can i get (in 2D math) dot displayed for derivative in time and prime displayed for space? 

Example u(x,t):
 

diff(u(x,t),x) --->  u'(x,t) output displayed in prime

diff(u(x,t),t)  --->  u^. (x,t) output displayed in dot

Thanks

hi guys i have a question for you,

can anyone help me to find the correct code to mantain the structure of vel_qD list and simplify the term diff(s1(t),t)??

i'm driving crazy for that beacuse i'm not able to do it...

thanks, down here i post the code...

vel_qD := [diff(theta1(t), t) = -(diff(s1(t), t))*cos(theta3(t))/(LAD*sin(theta1(t)+theta3(t))), diff(theta2(t), t) = (L1*sin(theta1(t)+theta3(t))*(diff(s1(t), t))+L1*sin(theta1(t)-theta3(t))*(diff(s1(t), t))-2*LAD*sin(theta1(t)+theta3(t))*(diff(s1(t), t)))/(LAD*LBC*cos(theta1(t)+theta3(t)-theta2(t))-LAD*LBC*cos(theta1(t)+theta3(t)+theta2(t))), diff(theta3(t), t) = (diff(s1(t), t))*cos(theta1(t))/(L3*sin(theta1(t)+theta3(t))), diff(s2(t), t) = (L1*sin(theta1(t)+theta3(t)-theta2(t))*(diff(s1(t), t))+L1*sin(-theta3(t)-theta2(t)+theta1(t))*(diff(s1(t), t))-LAD*sin(theta1(t)+theta3(t)-theta2(t))*(diff(s1(t), t))-LAD*sin(theta1(t)+theta3(t)+theta2(t))*(diff(s1(t), t)))/(LAD*cos(theta1(t)+theta3(t)-theta2(t))-LAD*cos(theta1(t)+theta3(t)+theta2(t)))]

Weyl tensor is identically equal to zero in 3D and I have tried to show this by inputting an arbitrary metric and calculating components of Weyl tensor. Thus this answer should give me the empty set but I am not getting that, thanks in advance.

CODE:

with(Physics):

Setup(mathematicalnotation = true)

Setup(dimension = 3, coordinates = (X = [x1, x2, x3]), metric = 2*F6(X)*dx2*dx3+2*F5(X)*dx1*dx3+2*F4(X)*dx1*dx2+F1(X)*(dx1^2)+F2(X)*(dx2^2)+F3(X)*(dx3^2))

g_[]

Weyl[alpha, beta, mu, nu, nonzero]

Download Weyltensor0in3d.mw

Hi all, I have a problem but can't solve, anyone help me. Example we have json link http://myjson.com/16knzm

How to read procedure getName and getAge from json link above to be

Thank you very much. Sory because my english is bad.

Hi,

While trying to run this code :

pde := diff(u(x, t), t) = k*diff(u(x, t), x, x);
bc := u(x, 0) = T, u(0, t) = a*t + b, u(L, t) = T;
pdsolve([pde, bc], u(x, t)) assuming (0 < k, 0 < L, 0 < a, 0 < b, 0 < T, 0 <= t, 0 <= x and x <= L);

I get the following error :

Error, (in assuming) when calling 'factor'. Received: 'floating point coefficients are incompatible with field extension; use 'real' or 'complex' instead'

Any idea why ?

Assume I know some relations like 0<a<b<c<1, n is positive integer, and I want to know if

holds. How to check this in Maple? Is there any command like verifiy evalb for this kind of problem.? Or solve the inequality in terms of c, given the relations of a,b,c?

Thanks.

Hi, I'm trying to plot equipotential lines and streamlines in Maple, and both equations are in polar coordinates. I can plot a contourplot in cartesian coordinates, but adding "coords=polar", it throws an error. I tried to write a do loop but it wasn't having it either. any help would be appreciated

restart; with(LinearAlgebra); with(plots);
K := 1;
psi := K*r^(4/3)*sin(4/3*theta);
phi := K*r^(4/3)*cos(4/3*theta);

p1 := contourplot(psi, r = 0 .. 1, theta = 0 .. 3*Pi*(1/8));

p2 := contourplot(phi, r = 0 .. 1, theta = 0 .. 3*Pi*(1/8));
display(p1, p2);

which version of maple start to support Grid Computing Toolbox?

It has become more and more common to meet questions as labelled as "Spam". What does this classification mean?
Strangely if you click on the little red flag "Spam" it even seems that you can delete the corresponding question.
Does it mean that some people here have the power to decide if a question deserves to be answered or merits to be put on the trash?
Given that these questions are answered the same way than any other non spam labelled question, why are they labelled as spam?