Thomas,

Thank you! I didn't know about that.

Is complete NAG library included in the toolbox, or it it just a connector from Maple to NAG (similar to Matlab toolbox), and NAG libraries (complete) have to be purchased separately?

Alec

The best way, I think, is Interleave in Robert Israel's post. It is, generally, the same seq as in your original post, but it is easier to work with. My Matrix examples were mostly just for curiosity.

Alec

The best way, I think, is Interleave in Robert Israel's post. It is, generally, the same seq as in your original post, but it is easier to work with. My Matrix examples were mostly just for curiosity.

Alec

I am not 100% sure, but I think that Vladimir Bondarenko posted that (or a similar example, one out of 100,000 bugs that he discovered) earlier. At least, it looked familiar, and I stopped using Maple somewhere around Maple 10.02.

Alec

I also prefer wheats. Unfortunately, it is not that easy to get good ones here, in America.

known=F+G also works, by the way - it seems as if it is processed the same way as known=[F,G].

Alec

Why not? You can use parse for that.

Alec

Why not? You can use parse for that.

Alec

known=F*G works though.

Alec

It can be also written as

int(exp(-eta^2)*(1-1/(1+exp(eta))),eta = -infinity .. infinity);
               infinity
              /
             |                  2  /         1      \
             |          exp(-eta ) |1 - ------------| deta
             |                     \    1 + exp(eta)/
            /
              -infinity

which Maple can do after expanding, but can't do without it,

IntegrationTools:-Expand(%);
                                  1/2
                                Pi
                                -----
                                  2

Alec

Maple 10 was not designed for Vista. You should check - there might be an update for a version compatible with Vista.

I have Maple 10 disks somewhere - just don't know exactly where. I thought about installing them - but while I can access a server with Maple, it is not that necessary.

Alec

Maple 10 was not designed for Vista. You should check - there might be an update for a version compatible with Vista.

I have Maple 10 disks somewhere - just don't know exactly where. I thought about installing them - but while I can access a server with Maple, it is not that necessary.

Alec

From my computer with 64-bit Vista I access remotely another computer with 32-bit Vista and with Maple, and everything seems to be working OK.

Edit: Just reread what I wrote... Well, OK in the sense that it works as it was designed - not in the sense that is OK how it works.

Alec

From my computer with 64-bit Vista I access remotely another computer with 32-bit Vista and with Maple, and everything seems to be working OK.

Edit: Just reread what I wrote... Well, OK in the sense that it works as it was designed - not in the sense that is OK how it works.

Alec

There should be usual round parentheses instead of the square brackets in the definition of u. Maple is using square brackets for lists.

Alec

There should be usual round parentheses instead of the square brackets in the definition of u. Maple is using square brackets for lists.

Alec