@sand15 To respond to your own query: I don't care. That would be shallow.

I care about it little enough that I sometimes don't pay it enough attention. I try to base it upon whether the content might lead to an actual solution. (But sometimes I Reply instead of Answer. And sometimes I err the other way. To err is human.)

I'll change this one, since it's moved you to comment. If you feel I've made a similar mistake in future then please consider changing it yourself.

Try this code for such labels on the 2D contours, by Kitonum.

Please put your followup queries about this problem as Reply/Comment here, rather than spawning a wholly separate new thread for it.

Or you could use the "Branch" item at the bottom of this Question's body, to started a linked new Question.

And also please make any new posting as a Question, not a Post.

@janhardo You could use the "Branch" item at the bottom of this Question, or of the relevant Answer or Reply? Then the cross-reference links will be automatically inserted in both threads.

(I asked just that you not spawn the related thread as wholly separate.)

@janhardo If you have followup comments/queries about this Answer (expressing Zeta(2) as an infinite product, etc) then please add such here rather than spawn a wholly separate Question thread.

@Hullzie16 You might first decide how accurate you need the results, then figure out how tight the precision and tolerances need to be to achieve that for a single m value, optimize that, and then figure out how many m values you need and optionally reuse a procedure to attain such, etc.

@Prakash J You could import using either ImportMatrix or ExcelTools:-Import , getting a Matrix say. Eg, (using Maple 18.02 as you have),

   M := Matrix(ImportMatrix("mapleprimes/foo1.xls")):

Then you could plot pairs of columns. Eg, you could plot the first column against the second,

   plot(M[..,[1,2]]);

You wrote of multiple plots, for different parameter values, but you're only showing two columns of Excel data.

ps. You didn't respond to my Anwer to your earlier differential equations Question (Blasius solution). Did it serve?

@Prakash J I cannot make sense of what you're trying to say.

@Earl I used the values 1,1/2,1/3 since those are the values used by default in the procedure.

The code can be seen with a showstat of the procedure. Here's a partial view of that:

Download coordplot3d_vals_M2020.mw

@mr_picky Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean by, "Is there a symbol for this..."?

If you're asking whether there's a 2D Input (like the capitol Sigma  notation) item, like from the palettes or command-completion, then no there isn't.

@Scot Gould Simple is,

  copy(A)

which doesn't have the burden of specifically using Matrix or Vector or Array, to match.

Using copy also preserves any special shape&storage and attributes (except read-only). Using the named constructors removes such, except sparse storage.

Both ways preserve datatype.

Please put your followup queries on this example here, instead of spawning wholly separate new Question threads for such.

(duplicate threads are flagged as such, and possibly then deleted.)

@AHSAN Your Question's attachment was last saved by you in Maple 2022.0.

Accordingly, I used Maple 2022.2 for my Answer. I don't use any add-ons, non-default computational or output settings, or initialization file.

@mmcdara I didn't complete what you did. I implemented something quite different.

By far the major portion of what I did was reimplementing the OP's entire scheme of computing and displaying his boundary as surface and contour rather than mere roughly approximate 3D points. And I implemented all that in wholly new custom procedures, using dsolve/numeric in a different manner.

I also retained his original method=_Dexp for the procedures I added, and instead adjusted the epsilon tolerance.

In one minor spot of his original loop code (which I entirely replaced, IMO) I did happen to also use the d01ajc method. That was purely by coincidence as I hadn't seen your Answer until just now. But I don't prefer the loop approach (or, at least, not any aspect of simply taking the highest mu data value accepted), and wanted method=_Dexp anyway on account of some precision experiments and root-finding I was trying on it.

@AHSAN

For example, the following places the lower flat surface at a custom distance below the bottom of the upper surface. The distance between them is 1/3 of the distance between highest and lowest points in the upper surface.

This attachment shows how that calculation is made programmatically. Adjust to taste.

Help_3D_view_acc.mw

ps. I really think that your Question's original text did not explain what you actually wanted to do.