@dharr  What a good news :)

Thank you for contacting Maplesoft Technical Support!

The version number should be 2026.1. I will inform our R&D team of this error.

Please note that the date and build ID is correct and corresponds to Maple 2026.1, so there should be no issue with the update. If you would like, you can check the Maple version from Help tab > About Maple to confirm.

Thank you for contacting Maplesoft Technical Support!

The version number should be 2026.1. I will inform our R&D team of this error.

Please note that the date and build ID is correct and corresponds to Maple 2026.1, so there should be no issue with the update. If you would like, you can check the Maple version from Help tab > About Maple to confirm.

same problem reported here

kernelopts(version);
  Maple 2026.0, X86 64 WINDOWS, Apr 28 2026, Build ID 2011354

kernelopts(version);
   Maple 2026.0, X86 64 LINUX, Apr 28 2026, Build ID 2011354

???

Should be Maple 2026.1 not a 2026.0!

Is this intended bahavior of the this update or not? 

@Jean-Michel  Same problem... Trial version is still 2025.2??!!

Yes, Maple help WWW pages are terribly inconsistent. There are really many broken links or links to the totally outdated Maple pages which was created many years ago without any logical, actual or relevant info.

I guess this is due to the lack of any proper care from Maplesoft staff, bacause of fact that Maple web portal is under supervision by a few people only during last years. 

After some discussions with Maple support team, I have the following answers:

1. Current version Maple + MTM 2025.2 is incompatible with Matlab R2025b on Ubuntu 24.04 platform (install hangs). On Windows platform is possible to perform installation, but help file are unaccessible by recent Matlab way.
2. Current system requirements, see here. R2024b is the newest MATLAB release supported by MTM (Maple Toolbox for Matlab for Maple 2025.x releases).
3. updates to Maple-Matlab compatibilities are always related only to a new main release of Maple, this is why MTM -and other 3rd party connectors- are always lagging behind a bit. So, I would check back in March 2026. But MTM has always been updated because we have many active users.
4. Effective and reliable switching mechanism between Matlab and Maple symbolic engines (in a case that both symbolic engines are installed) is not supported recently. So, only one symbolic engine is possible to use permanently. Switching-off the Maple symbolic engine is possible only by complete MTM install/uninstall.

@nm I totally agree!!! There is someone who likes to add this tag without any comment. Is there any chance for a regular mapleprimes user to identify the author of the tag?

@nm "duplicate question" tag is simply possible to remove ... :)

Your post is another clear sign that something is really wrong with Maple development. 

The Physics project is a typical example of a "one man show" project, where everything depends on one (??!!) highly motivated person. The future of the Physics project is now really unclear, and your current personal promises about future updates do not guarantee any future development in this important area. 

Frankly, I'm not sure whether Maplesoft is now really willing and able to develop a top-notch CAS system Maple for mathematicians and theoretical physicists, or just a general-purpose computing environment, primarily for students and engineers, with all the currently very popular bells and whistles (AI, LLM, ... many other unimportant features that are completely out of interest for serious scientific use). 

In addition, the entire Maple documentation has become more and more terribly unclear, complicated and difficult to understand in recent years. With the current state of the documentation or the overall concept of Maple, it is almost impossible to learn a thorough, reliable, efficient and proven way to use Maple. The number of functions that are able to do similar things with different algorithms is constantly growing, instead of generalizing and optimizing its performance. 

So in the end, thank you very much for your efforts and enthusiasm, but in general, in my opinion, the situation with Maple as a top-notch CAS is getting worse and worse...

@nm And still obsolete Maple printed Manuals:
https://www.maplesoft.com/documentation_center/Maple2024/UserManual.pdf
https://www.maplesoft.com/documentation_center/Maple2024/ProgrammingGuide.pdf

on the page: https://www.maplesoft.com/documentation_center/

The update on version 2024 was realized in Mapesoft web with more than 2 years delay??!!
See: https://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/235970-Maple-Online-Help

@Samir Khan What is new ... regarding Maple 2023? This is a joke?

Recent state snapshot ...

https://faq.maplesoft.com/s/article/How-to-Open-the-Matlab-link-on-Ubuntu