I find that for some plots the choice of location for tickmarks and axes labels in the Classic version is better than the Standard one. Eg. here:

with(plots):
complexplot3d(sin(z), z=-Pi-1.5*I..Pi+1.5*I,axes=boxed,
style=surfacecontour,tickmarks=[[-Pi=-Pi,0=0,Pi=Pi], 
default,default],orientation=[72,49]); 

Classic:

Standard:

I have chosen a particular orientation, but the result is more or less generic: in a large range of orientations the tickmarks/labels in Standard appear partially hidden or overlapping the surface.

May be an issue of taste, but the additional problem is, I think, that the user has no control on their location.


Please Wait...