The differential equation I'm solving for is:

I am having some difficulty animating the function shown in the attached file.  I am going to create an animation which will show the curve as a function of t.  My first question is that there is no way to compute K_n because the initial conditions I have are only given as arbritary functions F(z),G(z).  So I am not really sure how to proceed here.

My second question is that I also want to plot the Z dependent part of y as a function of z/b.  I have tried to incorporate this into Maple, however, all I get back is that there are 'unexpected variables present'

Thanks.

I have a bit of an issue.

I'm trying to solve this:

eq1:= exp(-lambda)*exp(k)/factorial(k) > .95

lambda:=2

solve(eq1,k)

Warning, solutions may have been lost

Good afternoon sir.

I request your kind support to the above cited query.

With thanks & Regards

M.Anand

Assistant Professor in Mathematics

SR International Institute of Technology,

Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.

Consider the differential equation zZ'' + Z' + a²Z = 0,  where Z = Z(z).  Using the change of variables x = \sqrt{z/b}with b a constant,  obtain the differential equation Z'' + (1/x)Z' + c²Z = 0, where Z = Z(x) and c = 2a \sqrt{b}.

I tried Maple help and it offers the dchange command, and what I have tried is shown below;

with(PDEtools):

DE:= ...

tr:= {z = x²b}

dchange(tr, DE)

This did not return anything however.  I am thinking I need to specify that b is a constant, however, I am a little unsure on how to do this. Is the above the correct way to proceed?  I don't see how I have specified anywhere that in the final PDE, I require Z=Z(x).

Thanks for any help.  This is my first post here, so apologies for the typesetting. If there is inbuilt latex, I will use it next time.

I need help writing a function which takes a number of integers (which are greater than or equal to 2) and returns a list where the nth entry in the list is given by the number of arguments which can be expressed in the form of x^n where x is an integer. The function must also disregard all of the terms after the final integer greater than 0 is produced ie does not show 0, 0, 0, 0, at the end of the list.

Eg if f was the function f(27) = [1,0,1]

f(2,3,4,9,81,1024) = [6,4,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1]

Hello,

I am using Maple Physics for symbolic tensor computations. However, I fail to simplify quite a simple expression.

Consider the following code:

    with(Physics):with(Library):

    Setup(spacetimeindices = lowercaselatin):

    Define(F[a]);

    read "example2.txt"; 

    Simplify(%);

Here is a file with expression: example2.txt.

The expression in the example2.txt is equal to zero. The following steps allow to obtain this result: expand, contract Kronecker deltas and metric tensors and collect similar terms. This also can be verified using another software (Cadabra, Mathematica xAct, etc.). As one can see, the result of Maple Simplify(%) contains terms like -462661905780*F[k]*F[~k] - 5856479820*F[m]*F[~m] which can be futher simplified, but Maple does not do this (even when I invoke Simplify(%) several times).

What is the right sequence of manipulations needed to obtain zero?

I use the latest Physics package (39.2, updated on November 30).

Thanks,

Dmitry.

Dear users

A friend of of mine has a problem with an integral and since it's for his thesis, it's pretty important. 

That's why I ask it here cause I don't know where to ask it elsewhere, so if it's wrong posted, completely my bad.

l:=(y*o)/(v);

R:=(Phi*o)/v;

A:=5*(a*ln(R)+b);

P:=sqrt(1+4*k^2*l^2*(1-exp^(-l/a)));

M:=int((2)/(1+P),o);

With other words, I want to integrate the wole thing to the variable o, who appears in the variables l and R.

Somehow, when I put this in Maple, it won't solve it. Probably it's just a stupid fault or i just forget something, but i don't find it. Does anyone knows how to solve it?

Already a lot of thanks!

Hi

Long story short I had a detailed question and then the session timed out and killed it!

Quickly then, if we calculate something recursively Maple acts differently to other languages.

For example, in Python:

__________________________________________

>>>t=1;

>>>t+=1;

>>>print t;

___________________________________________

Is interpreted as:

__________________________________________

>>>t=1;

>>>t=t+1=2

>>>print t

2

___________________________________________

In Maple:

___________________________________________

>t:=1

>t:=t+1

>print(t)

___________________________________________

Is Interpreted as:

___________________________________________

>t=1

>t=t+1=1+1=2

>print(t); t=t+1=1+1=2

2

____________________________________________
And there in lies my problem. Logically, I wish to use a iterative algorithm to work out an expression of the nth derivative of a function from the (n-1) derivative. However, doing this is in maple brings up "error (in Test) too many levels of recursion".

For context, Minimum Working Example:

____________________________________________

>TestFunction:=(x)->cos(exp(-1/x^2))*F(x):

>limit(TestFunction(x),x=0)

F(0)

>TestDerivative:=(x)->eval(diff(TestFunction(y),y),y=x):

>limit(TestDerivative(x),x=0)

D(F)(0)

>for i from 1 to 50 do
print(D^(i)(TestFunction)(0)=limit(TestDerivative(x),x=0));

TestDerivative:=(x)->eval(diff(TestDerivative(y),y),y=x):

od:

D(TestFunction)(0)=D(F)(0)

Error, (in TestDerivative) too many levels of recursion

_______________________________________________

Ideally, this code would output the limit of the second derivative at zero by differentiating the first derivative and then the limit of the third derivative at zero by differentiating the second derivative etc. But what Maple is trying to do is to find the limit of the second derivative by differentiating the function then differentiating the result of that, then to find the limit of the third derivative it will first derivative by differentiate the function, then the second by differentiating the result, then third derivative by differentiating the result of that. If I have the analytic expression for the 5th derivative and I wanted the expression for the 6th derivative, I do not want to work out the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and then 5th derivative when I've already an of the expression of the 5th derivative!

I will note, it is possible to avoid the problem by using different names at each step but that does not solve the iterative problem.  Is there anyway to force maple to overwrite a function name? Is there a seperate solution? Or is maple just that daft in this case?

Thanks for the help,

Hamzaan

Napoleon_Triangle.mw

Here 'show triangle napoleon considering the sintaxis Maple, to be supplemented and explained with Math Apps.

Napoleon_Triangle.mw

Lenin Araujo Castillo

hello please help me for maple worksheet 17

how can i do parametric diff?

i know implicitdiff and diff but i don't know how can i do parametric diff thanks very much

Hi everyone

I'm currently working on some mandate distribution using "Jefforson's Method" but I have run into some problems.

The general form of the calculations I do is as follows:

d:=fsolve(m = floor(v1/x)+floor(v2/x), x)

But in the case of m=5, v1=4969 and v2=208 it does not work. If I change v1 a bit it works as a charm but when 
4960=<v1=<4969 it does not.

Can any of you figure out why?

The equation surely has a solution (well, a lot of solutions). I can figure some out just by estimating and trying. Furthermore, wolfram alpha easily gives me several solutions:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=5+%3D+floor%284969%2Fx%29%2Bfloor%28208%2Fx%29

So how come I cannot get Maple to solve it?

Thanks in advance!

Dears 

I want to sum some series by Maple and plotting. The problem is the sum of series are known like

serer.pdf

the problem is the difference between two graphs at the intersection x-axis and y-axis.

Is there any solution for this problem.

Amr

I've been given a question:

Let pn denote the nth prime number. Then p1 = 2, p2 = 3, p3 = 5, p4 = 7, p5 = 11, . . . .

It is known that the infinite sum 1/p1 + 1/p2 + 1/p3 + · · · + 1/pn + · · · = infinity.

Find the smallest positive integer N so that 1/p1 + 1/p2 +1/p3 + · · · + 1/pN−1 + 1/pN > e. [Hint : ithprime(n) generates the nth prime number.]

How do I start off?

Many thanks!