Hello, 

For a few days Maple crashs everytime i try to use the command "plot3d()". 

I had'nt this problem befor and I have no idea what the reason could be. It ist irrelevant what Funktion I try to visualize,  the window just get closed evertime.

I hope someone can help me.

Thank you!

Tom

How do I simplify KdV equation in Maple by using =fxt))xx)?)

Download KdV_simplify

Hello
    In this example, we have the KdV equation    
         t] - 6 uux] + xxx] = 0                
    I would like to find the Lax pair for the KdV equation, which are    
               Lψ=λψ                
               ψ[t] = Mψ                
        
              Lt+ML-LM = 0  called a compatibility condition               
    So, I will start from this purpose    
    Then we will assume M in the form   
    will assume M in the form   
              M := a3*Dx^3+a^2+a1*Dx+a0              
    thenb using M and L in the for L[tL-LM = 0can find   
      Dx^5+( ) Dx^4+( ) Dx^3+( ) Dx^2+( ) Dx+( )=0              
    then wean find a_i =0,1,2,3   
  In the following maple code to do that 
  my question is    
   .How I canoue the soluo get a_i2,3 usinmaple code  
    any maple packge to find Lax pair for PDE -  

Download find_lax_pair.mw

I want to define the co-ordianates (phi, PI, ....)  as functions of some variable eg:- x,y.

I am studying the motion of a beam coupled to piezoelectric strips. This continuous system is modelled by two DE:

YI*diff(w(x,t), x$4)-N[0]*cos(2*omega*t)*diff(w(x,t), x$2)+c*diff(w(x,t), t)+`ρA`*diff(w(x,t), t$2)+C[em,m]*v(t) = 0;

And:

C[p]*diff(v(t), t)+1/R[l]*v(t) = C[em,e]*(D[1,2](w)(0,t)-D[1,2](w)(ell,t));
 

where "w(x,t)" stands for the beam's vibration and "v(t)" means the electric voltage, which is constant throught the beam. I would like to numerically solve both DE simultaneosly, but maple will not let me do it. I would like to know why. I am getting the following error:

Error, (in pdsolve/numeric/process_PDEs) number of dependent variables and number of PDE must be the same
 

I suppose it is because "w(x,t)" depends on "x" and "t", while "v(t)" depends solely on time, but I am not sure. Could someone help me out? Here is my current code:

restart:
with(PDEtools):
declare(w(x,t), v(t)):

YI*diff(w(x,t), x$4)-N[0]*cos(2*omega*t)*diff(w(x,t), x$2)+c*diff(w(x,t), t)+`ρA`*diff(w(x,t), t$2)+C[em,m]*v(t) = 0;
pde1:= subs([YI = 1e4, N[0] = 5e3, c = 300, omega = 3.2233993, C[em,m] = 1], %):
ibc1:= w(0,t) = 0, D[1,1](w)(0,t) = 0, w(ell,t) = 0, D[1,1](w)(ell,t) = 0, D[2](w)(x,0) = 0, w(x,0) = sin(Pi*x/ell):

C[p]*diff(v(t), t)+1/R[l]*v(t) = C[em,e]*(D[1,2](w)(0,t)-D[1,2](w)(ell,t));
pde2:= subs([C[p] = 10, R[l] = 1000, C[em,e] = 1, ell = 5], %):
ibc2:= v(0) = 0:

pdsolve({pde1, pde2}, {ibc1, ibc2}, numeric);

Thanks.

I have just upgraded my laptop from Windows 7 to Windows 10.  On starting up Maple 2018,  I receive the attached message on screen.  This is after previously loading the worksheet successfully.   Today,  I am not able to do so.  I need to permanently register my firewall to allow Maple to run; can anyone help?

Melvin

Hi everybody 

l I tried to install Maple 2018.2 on the golden master of Catalina and it didn't work : the installation process ended after the entering of the password to authorize the installation. In fact Maple 2018.2 still contains 32 bit elements. Is there a solution ? Thank you

David

Hello,

My question is mathematical in nature, so it might be a little out of place but I though I would give it a shot. 

You have a series of chebyshev coefficients in two connecting subdomains lets say S1 = [0,0.5] and S2=[0.5,1]. So far you are still in the spectral space. If you want to compute the solution in real space you can sum the coefficients with the Chebyshev polynomials. 

Now imagine you change the interval to S1 = [0,0.6] and S2 = [0.6,1]. Is there a way to manipulate the Chebyshev coefficients from both initial subdomains to create a new set of Chebyshev coefficients that fit the solution in the new subdomains. 

The brute force method would be to create the real solution of Chebyshev polynomials and then use that to form a new set of Chebyshev coefficients. Or you can use Clenshaw to compute the solution at several points, and then use the points to create new Chebyshev coefficients.

But what if we can stay in spectral space and create the new chebyshev coefficients. Is that possible? If so, how?

Dears, greeting for all

I have a problem, I try to explain it by a figure

This formula does not work.

I need to substitute n=0 to give G_n+1 as a function of the parameter s, then find the limit. 

.where G_n is a function in s.

this is the result

Hello!

I want to calculate Eigenvalues. Depending on values for digits and which datatype I choose Maple sometimes returns zero as Eigenvalues. Maybe there is a problem with the used routines: CLAPACK sw_dgeevx_, CLAPACK sw_zgeevx_.

Thank you for your suggestions!
 

Download Problems_LinearAlgebra_Eigenvalues.mw

I'm working towards creating a way to visualise real polynomial ideals! (or at least the solutions of the polynomials in the ideals) this code creates a plot showing the solutions to all the polynomials in the ideal generated by P1 and P2 (these are specified in the code)

with(plots);
P1 := x^2+2*y^2-3;
solve(P1, y);
Plot1 := plot([%], x = -2 .. 2);

P2 := -2*x^2+2*x*y+3*y^2+x-4;
solve(%, y);
Plot2 := plot([%], x = -4 .. 2);

P2*a+P1;
solve(%, y);
seq(plot([%], x = -4 .. 2), a = 0 .. 10, .1);
display(%, Plot1, Plot2)




This is because when you multiply two polynomials their set of solution curves is just the union of the sets of curves associated with the previous polynomials.

For the next step I'd like to create a graph of the solutions associated with an ideal with three generators. To stop this from being excessively messy I'd like to do it with the RGB value of the colour of a curve is determined by  a and b where the formula for a generic polynomial that we are solving and graphing is given by:

P1+a*P2+b*P3;

where P3 is given by

P3 := x*y-3

I've tried various ways to use cury to make this work (my intuition is cury is the right function to use here)  but got no where. Any ideas how to procede?

possible to solve following equation with unknown parameter omega.

parameter constant.

I see before for one dimension ode this type equation was solved.

Now for 2d equation is possible?

can consider or I can send again.

Best

2d-2

maple does not work at all

it displays this error

Error, (in StringTools:-FormatMessage) unknown option MAPLE
 

How I can replace  u__0r, theta, t) with f1, 1(r, theta) in attached file.

I want in I have only f1,1] function.

Thanks 

>  (1) >  (2)

Download replace

restart;

##########  omega and theta are variables,where J[3],F[2],H[2],etc are constants.

#### I tried with "evlf" and "evlc" command but maple was not ready to provide the solution,please help me to solve this

t1:=-1/(-16.*omega^2+exp(-4*omega)+exp(4*omega)-2.)*(-(0.5817764173e-1*I)*exp((2/9)*omega*cos(theta))*omega^5*cos(theta)*J[3]-(.6981317009*I)*exp((2/9)*omega*cos(theta))*omega^4*cos(theta)*H[3]-0.4524927691e-1*exp(.2222222222*omega*(cos(theta)-9.))*cos(theta)*omega^3*G[3]-.6205615118*exp(.1111111111*omega*(2.*cos(theta)-9.))*cos(theta)*omega^3*H[2]+.6205615118*exp(.1111111111*omega*(2.*cos(theta)-9.))*cos(theta)*omega^3*F[2]+.9308422676*exp(.2222222222*omega*(cos(theta)-9.))*cos(theta)*omega^4*H[3]-.1034269187*exp(.1111111111*omega*(2.*cos(theta)-9.))*cos(theta)*omega^3*G[2]-0.7757018900e-1*exp(.1111111111*omega*(2.*cos(theta)-9.))*cos(theta)*omega^2*G[2]-0.7757018898e-1*exp(.2222222222*omega*(cos(theta)-9.))*cos(theta)*omega^4*J[3]-0.9696273622e-1*exp(.2222222222*omega*(cos(theta)-9.))*cos(theta)*omega^3*J[3]-0.4524927691e-1*exp(.2222222222*omega*(cos(theta)-9.))*cos(theta)*omega^2*J[3]-.2714956613*exp(.2222222222*omega*(cos(theta)-9.))*cos(theta)*omega^2*H[3]-0.7757018898e-1*exp(.2222222222*omega*(cos(theta)-9.))*cos(theta)*omega^4*G[3]+0.8726646261e-1*exp((2/9)*omega*cos(theta))*omega^3*J[3])*cos((2/9)*omega*sin(theta));

t2:=int(int(t1,omega=0..infinity),theta=0..2*Pi);