When I try to run this particular programme, it pops up and tells me "Clarify Expression" - "Parts of the expression are ambiguous. Please select one of the suggested meanings." However, before the suggested meanings it quotes the line of programming that this happened on. When I made the programme, I did it line by line, so I know what the suggested options are, and which one I want. However, now the line of programming is such a big block of text that the window goes completely off screen. There's no way to resize it, and I can't move it high enough to see the options. What can I do?

I have installed Maple 10 Build 190196 and I wish to retain the settings and preferencess of Maple 9.51 Build 963582. Which files should I retain from Maple 9.51 before I uninstall it? Where should I place them to retain the 9.5 settings in 10? Thanks, Bill

I have the fuction F/sqrt(m^2*(omega^2-omega_0^2)^2+b^2*omega^2 and i need to fit data to it using the LSSolve command, i have no idea how to do this any help would be much appriciated. thanks.

How can I create a menu with Maplet Builder?

Hello, I am trying to animate a solution to a set of coupled second order differential equations but I am getting what looks like the concatenation of the velocity with the graph I am plotting (note the bump to the left of the solitary wave). I am also looking to make it a bit more precise so I do not see all the distortion as the animation runs, I believe this my be due to the approximation of the numeric solution. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, M. Hamilton

How do i use LSSolve to fit the correct resonance function to a set of experimental data, thanks

I want the data returned from a Maplet Evaluate to appear in a Table. I have listed below an example Maplet: with(Maplets[Elements]): > setdata:=proc() > Maplets[Tools][Set]('expdata'= [[5,42.6],[10., 31.5], [15,28.8],[20., 22.3], [30., 18.7], [45., 14.1], [60., 11.1], [90., 7.7], [120.,4.9], [180., 2.5], [240., 1.3], [300., .7]]); > end proc: > maplet := Maplet([ > # [BoxCell(Table([A, B], 'expdata'), 'as_needed')], > [BoxCell(TextBox['expdata'](3..30))], > [Button("OK", Evaluate(function='setdata()'))] > ]): > Maplets[Display](maplet); The Commented out "Table" line fails and the "TextBox" works OK. Is there a way to have this data appear in Table form?

Hi, I have a matrix containing data read from an external file. I would like the user to select a colon number using a List box and, based on this number, build the resulting vector from the matrix. Is it possible to ask Maple to evaluate some parts (execution groups?) of a worksheet with some command (not menus)? Thanks.

Does anyone here use or has ever used Maple-Connect ? Also how long were you using Maple before first attempting this ?

After reviewing the help pages on the Logic package I noticed that the commands used in examples usually contained an ampersand "&" before them. Does this in any way alter the meaning of the logical operator or (connective) in any from it's usual meaning in standard text ? for example, is &iff "if and only if" ? does ∧ stand for "and" ? does ∨ mean the logically inclusive "or" does &implies mean "if antecedent then consequent" ? and so forth... Dan

Hello members, My question is out of maple primes, but i was wondering if one of the members is and expert in MATLAB coding. I am trying to write a MATLAB code for numerical integration for a double exponential equation of the form i = io(exp(-alpha*t)-exp(-beta*t). The problem i am facing is how to eliminitate the error as the integration is taken as the area under the curve, say from time t=0.0 to t=25e-6. Your comments in how to solve this problem is highly appreciated. Regards, JacquieD.

Is it possible to change and save the default background color and pen settings for a sketch?

HIIIIIIIIIIIIIII! :) I'm doin a problem on the restricted 3 body problem...What i want is to creat a proc "equilibria(mu)" which finds all five equilibria of (DE) when mu_1=mu and displays, in a neat table, the (x,y)-position of each equilibrium and the eigenvalues of the vector field's Jacobian at that equilibrium. In addition, the table should indicate if the equilibrium is hyperbolic (all eigenvalues are real and non-zero), elliptic (all eigenvalues are imaginary and non-zero), hyperbolic-elliptic (a mixture of non-zero real and imaginary eigenvalues), or otherwise.. Now the difficulty is this, i can find the equ's and get the evalues, but i have a proble with gettin them into a table...i've been told that prinf is a good one to use, but i have no idea at which bit to use it..this is how far i've got

I want to ask about a small problem. I will present a paper at a conference in February. Because it involves time consuming calculations of numerical solutions for several onerous systems, I will do the calculations at home before the talk, save the results, and show the output to the conference. The folks attending the conference are not necessarily Maple Folks, so I do not want to have to explain the tilde after characters for which I have made assumptions. Of course, I know about

interface(showassumed=0);

After making the calculations here at home, traveling to the meeting, opening the file to make the presentation then, alas, the tildes are back again. Try this.

> assume(a, real):
> interface(showassumed=0):
> equa:=a^2+a-1;

Run this file. No tilde. Close the file saving the output. Open the file. There is the tilde after each “a".

My question:is there some way to make the tilde stay gone when I save such a file and reopen it without recalculation the worksheet?

Hi guys ;) I have a question. Is it possible to apply a PID controller with the following parameters(P=6,I=4,D=0.02)to a Non Linear System described with the differentiate equation like this mk*diff(x(t),t,t)+kfv*diff(x(t),t)-(ki^2*u(t)^2*kc)/(mk*(x(t)-x10)^2)-mk*g=0 or in the second form, as two differentiate equations like dx1 := (x1,x2) ->x2; dx2 := (x1,x2) ->((u*ki)^2*kc)/(mk*(x1-x10)^2)-g*mk/mk-kfv*x2/mk; without linearisation in operating point, where u - is input variable, x - position, dx/dt - velocity, d^2x/dt - acceleration ? Thanks for your help.