6 years, 55 days

## Solution of quite complicated equation i...

Maple 18

This is my code for finding mode shapes and critical load for a bimaterial strut under buckling.

Although everything else is working fine but I have a problem while solving for critical load.

h_new := convert(series(h, P, 3), polynom):

h_new := convert(series(h, P, 3), polynom):

without converting to polynomial, the code is unable to solve for P. Even on conversion, for differnet S values, I need to change the truncation order of conversion (like for S=0.5, it would work with 3 but for other S values I have to change truncation (convert(series(h, P, 6), polynom)), which also causes the number of solutions of equation to change which causes problem with plotting of graphs of critical load that I need (basically I need lowest two plots), thereby restricts me from automating the code with a for loop. I need to test it for various S values and then later in code I need to put teh critical load back and check mode shapes for different a values.

Is there a better way to solve two variable equation to get one variable in terms of another(the equation is quite complicated, contains trigonometric expressions).

and also if I try to automate the analysis for different S and a values, teh process needs to put teh value back in P which changes everything and teh next time loop operates it just ruins everything. Also there are varied number of solutions of P_crit for differnet S values which makes it difficult to store those solutions during automation?

## _rtable[4456495426]...

I am trying to find out the stiffness matrix of composite by using iterative loop that sums over each laminate and adds the result to the previously calculated matrix

D=null matrix

for i to 4 do Dply := evalf(evalm((1/3)*Q[i]*(z(i+1)^3-z(i)^3))); D := evalm(D+Dply) end do;
evalm(D);

although the values are coming out fine but in the diagonalm elements, it shows the true value + _rtable[4456495426] which I am not able to figure out why is it coming?

 Page 1 of 1
﻿