Can I use Maple to solve equation like  for a,b,c?

a,b,c are real numbers and I need to solve it in real domain.

With this application we can meet safety characteristics of a relationship and simple or compound functions. Made with maple 2015.

Relaciones_y_Funciones.mw

(in spanish)

L.AraujoC.

Dear all,

I have one probem in using Maple in comparison with Matlab.

Generally, when using Matlab, I write a long program with 500 lines (for example) and where I use some matricial calculations and other. When I want to repeat this program for some parameters (variables) many times, I transform the program to a procedure "Function" with just adding the command Function in the start of the program.

When using Maple, I have a difficulty to transform a long program which I want to repeat for some variables to a procedure "proc". The program uses packages like LinearAlgebra and other procedures.

Is there a simple way to transform a long Maple program to a procedure which should be repeated many times for some variables in Maple. 

I have especially problems with the commands local, global, use (for packages), etc.. and the warning related to the variables. It is not easy for a long program with many variables to write them in local or global variables.

Thank you.

I find mapleform software   but I dont know how to use , and does anyone know another method to convert.  I know use 

> with(MmaTranslator);
> MmaToMaple();  

I can  automatically translated .nb files.  but this have  

Error, (in readline) file or directory does not exist
Error, (in readline) file or directory does not exist
Error, (in readline) file or directory does not exist
Error, (in readline) file or directory does not exist

another Error, missing operator or `;`

also I try to use 

> with(MmaTranslator);
> FromMmaNotebook(Mma_notebook_filename, options);

I still dont know how is works?  can you explains for me and show me some example  , here is my example files.plot.zip

Hello everyone!

I'm trying to understand how to work with PDEs in Maple by solving a basic PDE such as the wave equation, along with conditions at t = 0 in terms of arbitrary functions. I stumbled upon the very same example, included in the Maple Online help at this page under the part "Three Textbook Examples":

I tried to copy and paste the code and execute it, but to no avail: it seems like pdsolve doesn't give me any other result than a blank space, unlike in the example reported in the Online help. Can anyone tell me if (and where) I am doing wrong? Is it possible that my version of Maple (Maple 13) may not be compatible with the procedures required by this example?

 A warm thank you to whoever will help me!

Hi EveryOne!

In the the answer of the question "How to find roót of polynomial in finite field and extension finite field (at URL: http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/203977-How-To-Find-Roots-Of-Polynomial-In-Finite#answer215097). Carl Love helped compute eigenvalues (x_1,x₂,...,x_n)and eigenvectors of the given matrix M over GF(2⁸)/(y^8+y^4+y^3+y+1).

I need to do:

1. Get matrix D from these eigenvalues (x_1,x₂,...,x_n), with D[i,i] = x_i and D[i,j≠i] = 0 (D will be diagonalizable matrix. Some x_i may be in extension finite field  GF((2⁸)²))

2. Get matrix P from eigenvectors corresponding to the above eigenvalues, compute P^-1

3. Compute matrix B = P x D^1/4 x P^-1 in  extension finite field  GF((2⁸)²).

Please help me!!! 

During a lengthy computation of mine - done using a well established and scientifically sensible external package - I get a Too many level of recursion error in PDEtools/NumerDenom.

Since it has always worked fine for simpler computation with the exact same code, I am wondering whether, with a bigger bound of the level of recursion, the computation could be succesful.

Which is the max level of recursion than maple allows?

Is it possibile to manually (at one's own risk) raise it, in the same line as raising, for instance, stacklimits kernel option?

I am doing some lengthy computation using the externally developed (and published in academic journals) package 'Janet' to compute the compatibility conditions of an overdetermined set of linear PDEs.

At some point in the process (for a set of equations rather, but not SO, complicated) the procedure gives the error

in (PDEtools/NumerDenom) too many level of recursion

I have contacted the developer of the packages and he told me that he never directly calls PDEtools functions, so he deems that that call is made by some more standard maple command (such as simplify).

I could not find any documentation of NumerDenom function, to try and understand what might be the problem (my set of equations has some extremely 'bad' fractions, but I hope this is not that naive)

How does NumerDenom works, and where is it called by 'standard' maple command?

Thank you all.

Hello, Everyone!

I have a big TXT-file (~ 40 Mb). There are 970001 strings in this file. In each string there are 5 float numbers. I use command: readdata to obtain information from my file.

The problem consist in time, which Maple spends to read data.

My question is: how can I accelerate file reading?

My code: "Test read.mw"

My file in zip-archive: "Imp34462 14.zip"

Hello,

After solving ode I am looking only for the values >=1.5. For example at t=1, y(t)=3.8940.

How can I extract the values >= 1.5 from the solution to use it as data (t,y(t)) and save it ?

restart;
with(DEtools); with(plots);
eqn := diff(y(t), t) = -.25*y(t);

 init := y(0) = 5;

sol := dsolve({eqn, init}, {y(t)}, numeric, output = array([seq(i, i = 0 .. 50)]));
p[1] := plot(1.5, t = 0 .. 50, colour = black);

p[2] := odeplot(sol, [t, y(t)], t = 0 .. .50, colour = red);

display(p[1], p[2]);

Thanks

I have been trying to fit a function to experimental data. To do this i was using

.

The data is of the type

.

When I use initialvalues, I get a result, that fits the data well, but is clearly not the desired minimum. Maple delivers g always bigger than 10000 which is nowhere near -7, where it has to be for physical reasons. When using parameterranges I get the error

Warning, no iterations performed as initial point satisfies first-order conditions.

He stopps computing and simply prints out my initialvalues or the first value that is in the parameterrange with a huge RSS.

How can I use initialvalues and parameterranges together for my data?

I have been puzzled by a matlab toolbox problem for a long time. How can I get Maple notation in matlab output?

Both "Input display" and "Output display" in Tools-->Options-->Display was changed from "2-D Math notation" into "Maple notation". And the output in Maple is indeed Maple notation like this:

But the output in matlab is also 2-D notation like this:

when copy it to Matlab or Maple as input, it become the wrong issues like this:

How can I output Maple notation in matlab? The version is Maple 18 and Matlab 2014b, respectively.

My task is to develop a mathematical model of time-variant temperature
distribution in a bar with Maple. 
The bar is made of aluminum. The length is 202 mm and the diameter
is 8mm.
Heat is supplied from the kitchen lighter where the flame burns on butane.
The height of the flame is about 4 mm.
Your model should be able to answer how long the time it takes to reach
a certain value of temperature at the distance of 10 cm from the heat source.

anyone can help to answer this? im totally new to maple.. hopefully some1 can help me to answer this..

Hi EveryOne!

I have polynomial: p(x) = x^4 + 27x^3 + x^2 + 16x +1 over finite field F=GF(2^8)/f(x)=x^8 + x^4 +x^3 +1

The factors of this polynomial are: (x + 37)(x + 217)(x^2 + 213x +30) (in maple)

Hence there two roots of p(x): x = 37 and x = 217 in GF(2^8). The factor x^2 + 231x +30 is of degree 2. There are not roots in F. But in extension field GF((2^8)^2) of F, also there are two roots of factor x^2 + 213x + 30 (for example: x = 256 and x = 256^256 = 487).

How to find these roots of p(x) in extension field GF((2^8)^2) by maple? Please help me! Thanks a lot.

So I've been trying to plot a parametric equation with the command:

But I keep recieving the error: Error, (in plot) incorrect first argument [cos(2*t)+sin(2*t), -2*sin(2*t)+2*cos(2*t), t = 0 .. 6.29]

Do any of you have an idea of what I'm doing wrong?