Hi

I have been trying to find a way to present results from engineering calcs to 2 decimal places (i.e.: 350.50) but the round function rounds to the nearest integer. Is there a specific statement for specifying the number of decimal places you want to present some results?

thanks

> assume(a < 0);
> convert(cosh(sqrt(a)), sincos);
print(`output redirected...`); # input placeholder
/ (1/2)\
cos\(-a) /

This is what I expected.

Now

> assume(L > 0);
> assume(K > 0);
> assume(mu > 0);
> assume(mu^2 < 4*L*k);
> assume(t > 0);
> convert(cosh((1/2)*t*sqrt(mu^2-4*L*k)/L), sincos);
print(`output redirected...`); # input placeholder
/ (1/2)\
| / 2 \ |
|t \mu - 4 L k/ |
cosh|--------------------|
\ 2 L /

I wanted to obtain again the cos function. Could someone help me?
(What is the reason that convert does not work "well" in later case?)

 Thanks,  Sandor

Dear guys

I have a function as P(t)=t*ln(t)^(-b) and I know that V(P)=P^(-2). I want to plot Vwith respect to for example Q.

All the things I know about Q is it is a function of t as well and diff(P(t),t) = diff(Q(t),t)^2.

How can I plot V with respec to Q?

Thanks a lot. 

Hi,

I tried to create a graph with two different x-axes and y-axes, for example:

It's no doubt that we can use the "dualaxisplot" to generated a plot with two different y-axes as follows:

It's seem that Maple can realize plots with two different x-axes , because some of cases present functions through upper x-axis, such as:

How should I create a graph to display functions using the bottom and left sides as the x- and y-axis for one, and the top and right sides as the x- and y-axis for the other?

I'd appreciate any help on this topic. Thank a lot.

Hello.

Could not evaluate numerical integral with constant in it. I use method = _cuhre.  Maple print solution like this:

Int(Int(Int(max(0., (0.9483573506e-3*(-1.*sin(a)*cos(w)-1.*cos(a)*sin(w)*sin(b)))*cos(a)*cos(b)^2*(-58.5*signum(cos(b)*sin(w)*sin(b))*kk+200.*cos(b)*sin(w)*sin(b))*Heaviside(-58.5+200.*cos(b)*sin(w)*sin(b)*signum(cos(b)*sin(w)*sin(b))*kk)*Heaviside(1.-.98*cos(b)^2)/sqrt(1.-.98*cos(b)^2)), a = 0. .. 6.283185308), b = 0. .. 1.570796327), w = 0. .. 6.283185308)+Int(Int(Int(min(0., (0.9483573506e-3*(-1.*sin(a)*cos(w)-1.*cos(a)*sin(w)*sin(b)))*cos(a)*cos(b)^2*(-58.5*signum(cos(b)*sin(w)*sin(b))*kk+200.*cos(b)*sin(w)*sin(b))*Heaviside(-58.5+200.*cos(b)*sin(w)*sin(b)*signum(cos(b)*sin(w)*sin(b))*kk)*Heaviside(1.-.98*cos(b)^2)/sqrt(1.-.98*cos(b)^2)), a = 0. .. 6.283185308), b = 0. .. 1.570796327), w = 0. .. 6.283185308)

How could it be taken.

Thank!!!

Does anyone exports Maple worksheets to as a LaTeX file?

All my work is typed in LaTeX but I rarely export a Maple file as LaTeX because Maple uses its own LaTeX macros that in a generous evaluation are a lot of "junk" around the LaTeX code. In practice  it is is easier to copy and past the Maple output and then make modifications to LaTeX by hand than to modify Maple's LaTeX code.

Does anyone know of a more efficient alternative than manually copying and pasting?

The ability to export LaTeX useful LaTeX code should be a basic to any symbolic math software, this is one of the few feature os Maple that are really disappointing.

i have got alot of mixed and high degree derivatives. For example:

u[x]*u[x,t]*eta[x,t]+u[]^2*u[x]*eta[x]+kis(x,y)u[x,t]^2*u[]+eta(x, y)*u[]*u[x]^2+ksi[x,t]*u[x]^2*u[x,t]+......

like this alot of terms

my question is how can i solve divided by the derivative of the u(x,t) partial differential equations system and so  how can i find eta(x,t,u) and ksi(x,t,u) 

Slides of the presentation at the VII Workshop Fast Computational and Applied Mathematics developed in graduate school at the National University of Trujillo. January 8, 2014.

Visualización_Geomét.pdf

L. Araujo C.

Dear Sirs,

I actually rigoruos to know what is the algorithm of BVP[midrich]? how it can obtain the solution of ODE with singularities?

Did anyone introduce a reference about the algorithm like this?

Thanks for your attention in advance

Amir

What is going on here?

Does anybody use maple 17 in the Mac's Mavericks OS? Or it does not support the new OS yet.

It seems in the sysytem requirement of maple 17, it said only supports OS 10.7, 10.8.

Hi everybody,

Suppose that in an equation, I have the term x^/(t).  I want to substitute it by v(t).  Any suggestion because I am trying but don't find an help page on this.

Thank you in advance for your help!

--------------------------------------
Mario Lemelin

Maple 17.01 Ubuntu 13.10 - 64 bits
Maple 17 Win 7 -  64 bits
messagerie : mario.lemelin@cgocable.ca
téléphone :  (819) 376-0987

Hi, 

In maple I have:

> evalf(Re(BRW(10.))); evalf(Re(BRZ(10.))); evalf(Re(BRF(10.))); evalf(Re(TOT(10.)));
0.07948364664
0.08085621836
0.8395727755
2.006454216 10 ^{-36}

Now , when I want to print maple give me problems:

file:=fopen("/home/nicoviaux/Post-Doc/BRT4.txt",WRITE):
try
for i to 3 do
fprintf(file,"%g %g %g %g\n",i/10.0,evalf(Re(BRW(i/10.0))),evalf(Re(BRZ(i/10.0))),evalf(Re(BRF(i/10.0)))):
od
end try:
Error, (in fprintf) number expected for floating point format
fclose(file):

Someone have an idea for this?

Thanks

I want to collect a two terms expression x/2+y/2.

But, I cannot do it as follows.

> x/2+y/2;

> normal(%);

>factor(%)

result was 1/2*x+1/2*y.

With which can I have maple modify the above expression to (x+y)/2.

Thank you in advance.

taro

Greetings to all.

The multiplicative partition function is defined here at Wikipedia and was recently the subject of a discussion at Math Stackexchange.

I posted two solutions to the task of computing this function at the above page that use Maple code. One of them employs the Polya Enumeration Theorem and is of mostly theoretical interest as it cannot be used to effectively compute the function for n with many factors. I posted two additional implementations in order to remedy this defect, one of them in Maple and the other in Perl. I think the Maple implementation is easy enough to read not to require additional commentary. Note, however, that even though the Maple code and the Perl code implement the same algorithm (dynamic programming), the Maple version is dramatically slower than the Perl version and consumes a lot of memory. E.g. Maple takes 58 seconds for the value for 9! and Perl takes 1.5 seconds.

My question is, can someone explain this difference? Note that both are interpreted languages so there is no gain due to potential compilations.

Your commentary is appreciated.

This is with Maple 15 (X86 64 LINUX).

Best regards,

Marko Riedel