How to find the integral int(-2*log((1+sqrt(s))/(1-sqrt(s)))/((-s^2+1)*(s-1)*sqrt(s)), s = 0 .. z)

any general method to eliminate the derivative of lambda1,lambda2,lambda3

a:= -(diff(lambda1(t), t))+lambda3(t);
b:= -lambda1(t)-(diff(lambda2(t), t))+4*lambda3(t);
c:= -lambda2(t)+3*lambda3(t)-(diff(lambda3(t), t));

result in 2*lambda1(t) - lambda2(t) + 2*lambda3(t) = 0;

solve({[(alpha[1]-alpha[2]*lambda)*sqrt(x)+p[2]*lambda]*[k[1]*(1-lambda^2)+2] = p[1]*(2*k[1]*(1-lambda^2)+2), [(alpha[2]-alpha[1]*lambda)*sqrt(x)+p[1]*lambda]*[k[2]*(1-lambda^2)+2] = p[2]*(2*k[2]*(1- lambda^2)+2)}, [p[1], p[2]])

Warning, solutions may have been lost

could you help me please to find a solution for this issue...

I would like to thank you in advance 

Best regards,

D.L.

I have to graph the following:

y=e^x, y=e^x+3, y=2*e^x, y=e^(x+3)

I put in plot(exp(x),exp(x)+3,exp(x)*2,exp(x+3)) but it is giving me Error, in plot (unexpected options): [exp(x)+3,exp(x)*2,exp(x+3)]

I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong!

It also will not allow me to graph ln(x)

Good afternoon sir.

I request you to provide the maple approach to workout Wielandt deflation & Hotelling deflation.

With thanks & Regards

M.Anand

Assistant Professor in Mathematics

SR International Institute of Technology,

Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.

Hello dear friends

I have a difficult issue about the new maple 17, since I installed the new update i can't use my shortcut to Evalulate and Display Inline. Before i could use the Cmd + alt + =  or Cmd + = 

Now it just zooming in about 10% zoom size when i type this. I use this command alot, i hope you guys can help me with this.

I don't use worksheet, it's just maple math-mode 2d and I use macbook pro 10.6

Hello,

I try to calculate a big matrix product which is used after for the resolution of a differential system.

In the link below, you have the matrix product which causes me trouble.

http://dl.free.fr/p8fP9XqWn 

The matrix are composed with trigonometric functions.

I think that the problem is due to the fact that Maple tries to determine a analytical solution.

But, for my use, i only need a numerical result that i can use after for solving my differential system.

Have you some ideas in order to make this matrix product? 

Thank a lot

Two problems surfaced when I upgraded my Mac to Mavericks (OS X 10.9).

First, the old Java SE installation was removed (actually, some linkages were destroyed), so a Maple launch puts up a dialog "need to install Java." Apple hasn't yet (10/23/13) updated the software database links --- installation fails with a "can't find software" error. I reinstalled Java using the version at http://support.apple.com/downloads/DL1572/en_US/JavaForOSX2013-05.dmg. (The links can be redone, it's just easier to reinstall.)

Second, the (new?) structure for /Library/Frameworks made my Maple license invalid. I dug out the old email with my activation code, then re-activated.

And all is now copacetic.

f := Diff(u(t),t$2)+Diff(u(t),t)+u(t)+x(t);

after indicate to extract u(t), should output Diff(u(t),t$2)+Diff(u(t),t)+u(t)

after indicate to extract x(t), should output x(t)

hello .

i don't know how to change matrix to string?
for example
to become ["00101111010","00001001111"]??
how can do that?
if matrix bigger containts, how i do that??

I have Maple 15 and I am transferring it to a different computer but I cannot find the download link anywhere. Where would I find it? Thank you!

Hello, i am working on creating a smooth curve from my data points: [0.2e-1, .158], [0.2e-1, .159], [0.3e-1, .161], [0.3e-1, .164], [0.3e-1, .166], [0.4e-1, .169], [0.6e-1, .173], [0.8e-1, .178], [.1, .185], [.11, .187], [.14, .193], [.19, .2], [.28, .21], [.38, .223], [.44, .233], [.58, .244], [.82, .256], [1.4, .278], [1.71, .281], [1.78, .282], [1.78, .282], [1.81, .282]

however, I am not sure how to to create the smooth curve formula for said data points. I tried using polycurve, but it didn't spit out any equations.

I would like to Maple 18 has tabs and dropdown menus NO. So in this way the locations of the applications would be