Am I having an off day, or does the view option for plots (and 3d plots) not work when one has axes=NONE? For example, the plots plot( x^2, x=-1..1, view=[-2..2,-2..2], axes=NONE); plot( x^2, x=-1..1, view=[-2..2,-2..2], axes=BOXED); produce completely different plots, with the view parameter being ignored in the first version. Can this be fixed? It seems a bizarre question, but I was trying to create a bit of space around a 3d plot so that it can be rotated without falling off the edge, and I can't figure out how to do that if I don't want axes.

Hi - I'm trying to collect cos(8t) and sin(8t) in the following equation: (-64*a*cos(8*t)-64*b*sin(8*t))*exp(6*t)+65*(a*cos(8*t)+b*sin(8*t))*exp(6*t)+81*c*exp(2*t) but the following command just spits out the same exact thing: collect(lside, [cos(8*x), sin(8*x)]) Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks.

Hi, I have a ‘slight’ problem (you will probably recognize it Joe! :-) ). It concerns the values of Tau, omega in my worksheet (see below). If I set Tau=0.7, omega=0.7*m*Eta everything is rosy, and works fine. If I start tweaking these values (which I have to) things go a bit pair shaped. I either get an error message after the first call to dsolve (e.g. when tau=0.5, omega=0.7*m*Eta) : "Error, (in dsolve/numeric/checksing) ode system has a removable singularity at r=1. Initial data is restricted to {Phi(r) = .20650095602297*diff(Phi(r),r)+.82088920025557e-1*I*diff(Phi(r),r)}"

I don't know how much interest this has for people on this forum, but I have just discovered (I think) a difference in how M10 and M11 handle differential equations. I just received M11 late last week, and when I tried to run in M11 a worksheet I had developed in M10 I got an error. It had to do with the fact that M10 gave me 2 solutions to a DE, whereas M11 gave me one. The first solution which M10 gave me was r(theta) = 0. M11 skipped this trivial solution. Arguably this is a better way to go, but it can cause problems for older worksheets, as it did on mine, where my next line tried to parse the second solution of the previous line. I have uploaded a file which illustrates this. Is it possible that there is some setting I could change in M11 to make it give me the same set of solutions as M10 gives?

hi! Could somebody tell me how to evaluate this double integral in Maple int(int(A*sin(2*Pi*B*(alpha-beta))/(Pi*(alpha-beta)),beta=-T/2..T/2),alpha=-T/2..T/2) Thanks, Raj

I'm an older adult, getting back into math and realizing how much I've forgotten. Likewise, I'm new to maple and just made a discover. Anyhow, I'm wondering if I'm looking at this correctly. The following: sum(piecewise(n <>

Hi, I am trying to add some useful inverse Laplace transforms to Maple's integral tables. I am frustrated that these transforms will only be recognized subsequently if they are entered in exactly the same format. For example, if I type: invlaplace(exp(-p*sqrt(s)/s),s,t); I get: invlaplace(exp(-p/s^(1/2)),s,t) but if I add this transform to the table: addtable(invlaplace,exp(-p*sqrt(s)/s),erfc(p/(2*sqrt(t))),s,t); then I get: invlaplace(exp(-p*sqrt(s)/s),s,t); erfc(1/2*p/t^(1/2)) However, if I change the p to an alpha: invlaplace(exp(-alpha*sqrt(s)/s),s,t);

Hi, I'm currently investigating whether share prices can be successfully be modelled as a random walk and as part of this wish to include a program to generate such walks using maple. I've already been able to produce a program (with some help) where the output is a simple ramdom walk. The inputs I had were the starting value of the walk, the probability of an increase ( where 1 minus this is the prob. of a decrease). how much to increase by at end stage. Only now I've done some research and found that there are two potentially ways of how share price are distributed either normally, or by a scaled t-distribution. Any ideas of how to implement these? Any help is greatly appreciated.

Hi, I was trying to create a window selection button in a Maplet reading the values from two radio buttons with a procedure and use the procedure output inside a runwindow command, but it´s fail. Can anyone help me? Here is the code with 3 diferent options that I try. > restart; > with(Maplets[Elements]): > with(Maplets[Elements]): > selection:=proc(test1,test2) > global procout; > if (teste1='true')then > procout='W2' > elif (teste2='true') then > procout='W3' > end if; > print(procout) > end proc: > maplet := Maplet('onstartup' = 'A1', > Window['W1']('title' = "Window Selection Button", 'layout' = 'BL0'),

I'm still making the transition from VB thinking to MAPLE thinking. In VB I delcared an 9 x 9 array of type square, where square was defined by Private Type square NumPossible As Integer Possible(9) As Boolean Number As Integer End Type I am trying to do the same thing in MAPLE with the code below. Since MAPLE is more flexible than VB, a certain possibility occured to me. With the code I have written below, does MAPLE have to store in its symbol table at run time 81 copies of the symbols 'Number', 'Possible' and 'NumPossible' ? Square:=Array(1..9,1..9); InitializeArray := proc ()

I'm not sure where to start on this problem. Can anyone help?

I was just curious what Maple 11 for linux looked like? Does it look the same as Maple 10 or better? I ask because I've noticed that a lot of the commercial linux versions of products are given a crappier looking interface. Any screenshots that someones aware of? Thanks in advance

Hi. >sol2:=dsolve( {diff(c(x),x,x)=c(x) , c(0)=5, int(c(x),x=0..1)=3 },c(x)); Error, (in PDEtools/sdsolve) the input system cannot contain equations in the arbitrary parameters alone; found equation: _F1[x]-3 this is a DE of second order, so it requires two conditions to find the constants.. I wanted to give one of the conditions in the form of an integral, but i get the error above. Any idea why? thanks

I wonder if someone would be kind enough to explain the output I am getting in the simple attached file. I understand the array that is being output - that is what I want. But why the 9 below it, and the pair 'true,true' near the bottom? -Thanks View 2292_IncrementGroup.mw on MapleNet or Download 2292_IncrementGroup.mw
View file details

Hello peeps, In some of my calculations, I need to find and answer that is greater than or not equal to a certain value.... for example differentiate a function which gives x=-2 & x=3, if I now wish to define has to be x>0, how would I incorporate that into my maple command? Thanks in advance