It looks like part of the equation is missing at the end of the first line.

Thanl you .

So simple when you know. What is  op(op(%)) supposed to do? It works fine without it.

Thanl you .

So simple when you know. What is  op(op(%)) supposed to do? It works fine without it.

Thank you. I didn't know about the blank having such an effect. a bit of history. The Xs are the real roots of a 20th oder polynomial which garunteed the Ys real, so that's what started of the lists idea. With hind sight I should have probably have put all teve valuse in a 20X6 table and then deleted rows accordingly. As the complex numbers( a,b,c) were being genarated by arcsin(x) iI got around the problem be checking |x|<=1.

Thank you. I didn't know about the blank having such an effect. a bit of history. The Xs are the real roots of a 20th oder polynomial which garunteed the Ys real, so that's what started of the lists idea. With hind sight I should have probably have put all teve valuse in a 20X6 table and then deleted rows accordingly. As the complex numbers( a,b,c) were being genarated by arcsin(x) iI got around the problem be checking |x|<=1.

Very very interesting. So Maple treats g[2011] as being equal to g[2101] That explains a lot.

During the week I had sutmbled across assign(solve(functionname)) and it was working.

That worked for g[1000]series G[200] series and G[300] series. So g[1001] is treated as equal to g[1010] etc.

The way g's and G's are being generated is for example

Θ2:=add(add(add(`if`(i+j+k<=4, g[2000+100i+10k+k]*c[1]^i*c[2]^j*c[3]^k^,0),i=1..4),j=1..4),k=1..4);

then the coeffs of this Θ is compared to a Determinant of c[1],c[2],c[3].

Basicially I am copying the formulas from a paper and am trying to stay close to the notation used. Interestingly enough in the paper the notation used is g_2-110 . But that doesnt seem to help. I would appreciate any advive

Very very interesting. So Maple treats g[2011] as being equal to g[2101] That explains a lot.

During the week I had sutmbled across assign(solve(functionname)) and it was working.

That worked for g[1000]series G[200] series and G[300] series. So g[1001] is treated as equal to g[1010] etc.

The way g's and G's are being generated is for example

Θ2:=add(add(add(`if`(i+j+k<=4, g[2000+100i+10k+k]*c[1]^i*c[2]^j*c[3]^k^,0),i=1..4),j=1..4),k=1..4);

then the coeffs of this Θ is compared to a Determinant of c[1],c[2],c[3].

Basicially I am copying the formulas from a paper and am trying to stay close to the notation used. Interestingly enough in the paper the notation used is g_2-110 . But that doesnt seem to help. I would appreciate any advive

freeze.mw

I tried freeze on one equation but it only frooze one variable. Am i doing something wrong? have attached sample

freeze.mw

I tried freeze on one equation but it only frooze one variable. Am i doing something wrong? have attached sample

@Markiyan Hirnyk 

sum(sum(A[i]*B[j], j = 1 .. min(6, 8-i)), i = 1 .. 6);

I changed it to the above later.That worked and gave me the counting sequence I'm after.

Thank you for your help

@Markiyan Hirnyk 

sum(sum(A[i]*B[j], j = 1 .. min(6, 8-i)), i = 1 .. 6);

I changed it to the above later.That worked and gave me the counting sequence I'm after.

Thank you for your help

Based on what you did I tried this

 sum(sum(A[i]*B[j], i = 1 ..6 ), j = 1 .. min(6, 8-j));

But It would not calculate it

Based on what you did I tried this

 sum(sum(A[i]*B[j], i = 1 ..6 ), j = 1 .. min(6, 8-j));

But It would not calculate it