@acer  i delete it , in case i undrestand more about hirota and post with more detail  i work on it and i don't know when i finish the work but my target is still remain  about finding best way for finding D-operator  of any NPDE. and indeed when i post a different one two just becuase contain hirota moderator delete my post becuase of that i did.
why there is any problem?

@acer  I have a habit that unless I see something, I can’t do it. What you’re saying is very easy, but I haven’t seen it.

@acer each time we get this problem we post here fixed for us , i watch your code and me is not have any different but your code run mine not . my maple don't have 1D it work for latex too so

@acer i can't see any different?

@acer i just ask one more question a new algorithm i find know with a lot of example included ,i have to post this one 

@acer so i need another space no one watch the comment 
please don't delete!

@acer I want to refine my question to make it more clear and focused. The topic remains the same, but I plan to rephrase it so that it's easier for someone to understand and provide a helpful answer. Once I get my answer, I'll leave. I'm not here to cause any trouble—just seeking clarity on my topic, can i delete this question and again post the new one? i don't have anychoice

@janhardo i just looking for undrestanding without coding my coding is bad, but ask question they will @mmcdara  already finish it and he now how wrok with structure and there is a lot people which now this structure ...

@janhardo i think it is usless, instead of this ask question there is a lot people which can help a lot 

@janhardo  i am not home to check you did it can this applying for all pde or not?

@janhardo if get notion of this it will be easy for apply for more dimension still solve remain but solving is better than this hirota i will post another equation you post some question too if just i am post it will be bad becuase deleting

@janhardo is so hard we can't hundle it easy

@mmcdara is satisfy just when is simple equation i apply for two other equation but not satisfy when f_tt apear in equation 

@janhardo if  you can test i have a lot example which is i am stuck really ? test some of them let see what will happen? i can't undrestand the pdf coding

@mmcdara

I reached out to others as well, but their response was dismissive. One even said, "Do you think I’m jobless to look into this for nothing?" I’ve searched extensively, and no one has provided a clear explanation of the work—this isn’t the first email I’ve sent to experts in this field.

With your help, I’d like to develop a comprehensive package that works for all equations. However, I need support to expand this further and explore additional equations to refine the approach.