Is there a short-cut for jumping to a specific output label in a Maple worksheet?

I have a Maple worksheet with over 200 labels:  (1), (2), ....., (236) etc?

"Find" does not seem to work.

Thanks

Frank Garvan

I have Maple 2016 and Matlab 2016b installed on my Windows destop.

When I run

with(Matlab);
openlink()

in a Maple worksheet the following error window appears.

After closing the window I also see the following error message,

Error, (in Matlab:-openlink) there was a problem finding or loading matlink.dll. Refer to ?Matlab,setup for help configuring your system to work with the Matlab-link.

How to fix the connection from Maple to Matlab?

A classical probability result says that if G₁ and G₂ are two independent Gamma random variables with same scale parameter (let's say 1 to simplify) and shape parameters a₁ and a₂ respectively, then G_k / (G₁ + G₂ ) is a Beta random variable with parameters (a_k , a_3-k ) (k=1..2).

In the attached file it is shown that (Maple 2015) function Statistics:-PDF fails in computing the PDF of G_k.
Noting strange here if you observe that even in the extremely simple case Z = X / (X+Y), where both X and Y are independent Uniform random variable with support [0, 1), Maple 2015 already fails in computing PDF(Z).

An alternative to Statistics:-PDF is to write explicitely the double integration which defines CDF(Z) (to begin with, and later PDF(G_k)) and ask Maple to do the integrations.
This approach works for Z but requires helping Maple when X and Y are still independent Uniform random variables but with respective non instanciated supports [0, a₁) and [0, a₂).

Applying to the Gamma-Gamma case the recipies I introduced in the Uniform-Uniform case does not give any result, unless in the very particular case where the shape parameters a₁ and a₂ are (strictly) positive integers.

All the details are in X_over_(X_plus_Y).mw

Do you have any idea how to prove with Maple the probability result mentioned at the head of this question?

PS: The "classical method" to do compute PDF(Z) consists in changing the integration variables < x₁, x₂ > into < x₁ = v₁v₂, x₂ = v₂ (1-v₁) > (see for instance Stack exchange)... but even after having dome it I still cannot get the desired result.

Thanks in advance.

I experience the following quirk using maple 2025 in worksheet mode: copy a formula and then paste it can often freeze the program. Termination only via ctrl-Alt-delete task manager. Has anybody similar problems or should i think that is happening only in my case?

f(a).b;            #ok
                           (f(a)) . b

op(0, f(a).b);     #ok
                               .

lprint(f(a).b);    #ok
f(a) . b

f(7).b;            #???
                             f(7) b

op(0, f(7).b);     #???
                               *

lprint(f(7).b);    #???
f(7)*b

I'm working on a system of coupled ordinary differential equations with multiple degrees of freedom. I would like to explore the existence of multiple solutions by using a bifurcation diagram. To this end, I tried using the built-in Bifurcation command in Maple. However, the command repeatedly returns errors and fails to produce the expected plots.

Has anyone successfully used the Bifurcation command in Maple for coupled ODE systems? Are there specific settings or prerequisites that I might be missing? I would greatly appreciate any guidance or example code demonstrating how to properly use this command for such systems.
bifurcation.mw

To organize windows, Windows 11 provides a new function "Snap Layout". The example screen shot below shows options to place the Maple 2025 Screen Reader window.  

Draging now Maple 2025.1 Screen Reader to the left window of the third option results in the following selection screen

where on the right a list of tasks to chose from is presented. In this list Maple 2025.1 is missing. However Maple 2025.1 was running as can be seen from the task bar.

Has anybody managed to position Maple 2025.1 windows with the Snap Layout (or alternatively with Win+Arrow keys) or at least reproduce what I see on my computer?

Why can a Maple 2025.1 window be adjusted by hand but Windows does not do this in Snap Layout?

(Dragging and adjusting a Maple window by hand is not an option. This is how we had to work before Windows 7.)

what is problem in here

Download remove.mw

i want plot a system of differential equation and do phaseportrait i did but when i want make it a little bit more clear and colorfull like rainbow when i find the C.Q i don't know how set the option for ploting?

e1.mw

Someone should please help me compute the left and right eigenvectors of the system below. The purpose is to compute values for 'a' and 'b' in the bifurcation formula.

Thank you

Download CBD2.mw

It is not difficult to manually check the validity of the identity  sqrt(x+2*sqrt(x-1)) = sqrt(x-1)+1 , which is true at least for all  x>=1 . I don't know of any Maple command that directly makes this simplification:

expr:=sqrt(x+2*sqrt(x-1));
simplify(expr);
simplify(expr) assuming x>=1;

It was possible to simplify it only by making a variable substitution  x=y+1 (and then a reverse substitution  y=x-1 ) :

expr1:=subs(x=y+1,expr);
simplify(expr1);
subs(y=x-1, %);

By the way,  the CAS Mathematica also cannot cope with simplifying the expression  expr .

Wondering what the experts here think of this. Should not simplify have worked on this automatically? By trial and error, found that combine command is what simplified it the best.

But I think simplify should also have done the same.  

Interested to hear what others think, and why simplify (even using trig option) did not do it.   

The issue is that this is done in code, without lookin at the screen and deciding what to do based on what the expression "looks like".

Download simplify_vs_combine_june_4_2025.mw

Hello, 

I'm working on a Maple package that manages external processes via TCP connections. I'm using ModuleUnload for cleanup, but I need to better understand how it behaves during Maple termination.

The issue:
- I have a module that manages external processes (via TCP connections)
- I implemented ModuleUnload to kill these processes when the module is unloaded
- ModuleUnload works perfectly when using 'restart' 
- However, when closing the Maple window, the external processes remain active

Investigation:
Using 'lsof', I observed that:
   - When Maple closes, it properly closes its TCP connection (goes to CLOSE_WAIT state)
   - But the external processes remain active

Questions:
1. Is this the expected behavior of ModuleUnload during session termination?
2. Are there alternative approaches to ensure cleanup when Maple is closed?

Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks!

I used Maple’s odetest to check the validity of 36 exact solutions.

About half of them return zero, meaning they satisfy the ODE correctly. But the other half don’t — odetest gives nonzero expressions.

My question is:

Could there be a mistake in my assumptions, or are some of these solutions only valid under specific conditions?

I’d appreciate any clarification or suggestions.

ode-test-36.mw

Respected sir,

I sincerly apologize to take your valuable time.

kind help with construction of function for the question in the word file attached.

Kind help please it may be simple too.

Kind_help.pdf