@vv Exporting foo.mw as foo.tex gives me a .pdf file foo.tex.pdf; similarly exporting as .mpl gives a .pdf file foo.mpl.pdf. (same exporting as .html).
Save as foo.tex gives me a .mw file foo.tex.mw; similarly saving as .mpl gives a .mw file foo.mpl.mw.

In Windows 11, both dialogs are present, but they do not have default options, only *.*.

@salim-barzani I didn't try to follow the logic too closely. You derived eqns but then didn't solve them?

On the very last line of the page (the copyright line) there is an option "consent preferences" you can click.

Yes, that does seem a poor default choice. At least on windows if you enter *.mw as a file name and then hit enter, it will filter to show only the *.mw files.

@janhardo I only plotted 1 pair, but solve said that for any t__1, you find another point at t__1 + Pi, and the curvature is also the same at those, so it is sayng that there are an infinite number of pairs.

@Alfred_F You can use plottools:-getdata to get data from a plot, but for a continuous plot as you have, the data points won't be where you want them. I recommend instead generating the data you want (and then plotting it). I made a matrix, but for nicer output you could look at a DataFrame.

gettingdata.mw

@mmcdara Yes! The number of (unrestricted) partitions for n=10000 is 3.6 x 10^106 or exactly:
36167251325636293988820471890953695495016030339315650422081868605887952568754066420592310556052906916435144

as found from 

P := Iterator:-Partition(10000);
Number(P);

I assume you mean the only condition is that no 1s appear. But then [8] would be OK?

@C_R I find the same behaviour as you for Windows 11, same build number. 

My understanding was that you are taking the small k limit under the condition that k[i]/k[j] is O(1). So I set the O(1) constant to b and then discarded beyond squared terms in k. That logic gives the same result for the exp(A34) you give here. Since we are doing the small k[s] limit, I can't see why the k[s]^2 term on the denominator wouldn't be neglected relative to the constant term, even if I could derive that expression.

There must be more to it than presented here.

@emendes You can get 20 solutions by solve(eqjerkAB) and 18 by SolveTools:-PolynomialSystem(eqjerkAB) - I'm not sure why the numbers of sulotions are different; in my experience the solution sets are usually the same. But Maple chooses the order of variables here. You can choose a variable order by putting the variables in a list. For PolynomialSystems this is an elimination list so that in general the last ones will be given in terms of the earlier ones. So you might get alpha[9,3,0]=alpha[2,3,0] but then not alpha[2,3,0] = alpha[9,3,0]. So are those two different solutions for you?

For a given order, PolynimialSystem should give an exhaustive list. Perhaps solve tried some different orders and found more solutions. If you want any order I suppose you could try giving different orders to PolynomialSystem, but there are a lot of possibilities.

@C_R Accrding to here, WSL can "run various Linux distributions, such as Ubuntu, Debian, Kali, and more".

You mean without using the Windows Subsystem for Linux? I haven't used it but I think it gives you the best of both worlds.

@Carl Love Yes, but tile vertically seems to be gone :(