@acer so i need another space no one watch the comment 
please don't delete!

@acer I want to refine my question to make it more clear and focused. The topic remains the same, but I plan to rephrase it so that it's easier for someone to understand and provide a helpful answer. Once I get my answer, I'll leave. I'm not here to cause any trouble—just seeking clarity on my topic, can i delete this question and again post the new one? i don't have anychoice

@janhardo i just looking for undrestanding without coding my coding is bad, but ask question they will @mmcdara  already finish it and he now how wrok with structure and there is a lot people which now this structure ...

@janhardo i think it is usless, instead of this ask question there is a lot people which can help a lot 

@janhardo  i am not home to check you did it can this applying for all pde or not?

@janhardo if get notion of this it will be easy for apply for more dimension still solve remain but solving is better than this hirota i will post another equation you post some question too if just i am post it will be bad becuase deleting

@janhardo is so hard we can't hundle it easy

@mmcdara is satisfy just when is simple equation i apply for two other equation but not satisfy when f_tt apear in equation 

@janhardo if  you can test i have a lot example which is i am stuck really ? test some of them let see what will happen? i can't undrestand the pdf coding

@mmcdara

I reached out to others as well, but their response was dismissive. One even said, "Do you think I’m jobless to look into this for nothing?" I’ve searched extensively, and no one has provided a clear explanation of the work—this isn’t the first email I’ve sent to experts in this field.

With your help, I’d like to develop a comprehensive package that works for all equations. However, I need support to expand this further and explore additional equations to refine the approach.

@mmcdara 

I didn’t provide detailed information on this topic earlier, not because I didn’t want to, but because I wasn’t entirely sure about it myself. However, from your Hirota code, I realized something valuable. Regarding the quadratic application, I tested it on two equations—KdV and Sawada—and it worked. Now, I need to verify it for other equations.

Let me explain. In the @.mw file, I’ve documented the full details. However, I’d like you to help refine my explanation and make it more understandable. Moreover, I hope we can automate the process to work for any equation.

Currently, the equations are simple, but improvements are needed to extend this method to higher dimensions, such as (2+1) and (3+1). Right now, it’s only applicable to (1+1) dimensions. The most challenging part is ensuring the calculations are accurate and free of mistakes. Once that’s addressed, the next steps involve identifying methods to find solutions.

Download hirota-kdv&sawada.mw

update some information we need that part in figure 2

@janhardo why don't have any react when i change parameter? and siza of plot is so big is better if go to left or right !?

@janhardo  is simple i want change delta in begin and then export data if  maple can't plot i need data if maple can plot what i want is be better that is my mean i am looking for plot that matrix in maple if possible but i need effect of delta begin when i change

Download plot.mw

@janhardo i know every structure each delta give another shape of graph more noising but i need programing all and show that with geometrically for publish