I just installed Maple 2018.   There are long delays when typing imput into a worksheet.  Never had this problem with Maple 2017. I assume that there is some new debugging going on during my input.  But, whatever it is, is there a way to turn it off?

Hello. I have the system of inequalities -x / 2> 0, -x> 0, (-x-y) / 2> 0, (-x-z) / 2> 0, -y> 0, -z> 0. Tell me, please, how to build a graph on it?

Error, (in is/internal) too many levels of recursion

I get the error above when attempting to solve for the roots of partial derivative.  My results are below:

Download 2_many_levels_of_recursion.mw

How I can pdsolve this partial fractional  equation?

1.mw
 

Download 1.mw

I have just begun to study Green's functions and made some initial progress on a problem, but now need Maple to make further progress.  Apologies, I have written up the equations in LaTeX form rather than Maple, as my Maple has gotten very rusty.

$\frac{d^4y}{dx^4}=f(x)

y(0)=y'(0)=0, y(1)=y'(1)=0$

I showed that the Green function $G(x,u)$ for this equation satisfies a condition

$\lim_{\epsilon\to0}\bigg[\frac{\partial^3G}{\partial x^3}\bigg]_{x=u-\epsilon}^{u+\epsilon}=1$

and showed that there is continuity of the Green's function and its first and second partial derivatives with respect to $x$ at $x=u$.  The next step is to show that this function has a piecewise definition such that

\[G=\frac{1}{6}x^2(1-u)^2(3u - 2ux -x\] for x between the range 0 and u and such that

\[G(x,u)=\frac{1}{6}u^2(1-x^2)(3x - 2xu - u) for x between u and 1

I am not entirely sure how to do this with pen and paper, so I have reason to believe that it could be a done a lot more easily with Maple, if someone could give some pointers that would be much appreciated.

Hi, i want to plot a function say R(t,n),

plot(R(t), t = 500 .. 50000) how can specify the t can only take intger value in the range of [500, 50000]?

I am looking for something like :plot(R(t), t = 500 .. 50000, assume=integer)

Hi all, I am having the follwing DE:

restart: 
(diff(z(x), x, x))-z(x) - cos(2*x)/(1+delta*z(x)) = 0:

With initial conditions: z(-pi/4)=z(pi/4)=0 and |delta|<<1

I showed by hand by using perturbation theory the second order approximation. The hint was: you can use Maple to check your answer. 

Is there somebody who can help me with this?

I have been attempting to resolve a particular problem to which I have posted a number of questions in the past.  In my attempts I have stumbled onto a number of command syntax issues & inconsistent result outputs.  Each time I try to post questions that appear to me to be separate questions even though it pertains to the same problem.  On numerous occasions a website moderator has deleted my questions unilaterally because the moderator has the opinion the question is identical to a previous question.

Deleting my questions instead of placing them into a previous thread without a response impedes my progress.  I am going to repost this inconsistent output, ONCE again!  If it is directly related to another thread then notify me of the response somehow instead of simply deleting the question.

The following inconsistency as far as I can tell is not explained in any of my previous questions.  I have a series that represents a particular waveform.  The series representation gives a definitive output.  However, when attempting generate the series of the derivative of this waveform (Q3 & Q4), which does exist (Q1 & Q2), MAPLE chokes on that representation & simply continues to evaluate for days & weeks without generating an output.  Why is this?  If anyone gets a definitive result please post it so that I might be able to reproduce the results.

Thanks in advance.

inconsistent_results.mw

Hi, 

I'm currently studying the Rossler Attractor, which is the following system:

.

I have found the points of equilibrium of the system.

But now I need to draw bifurcation diagrams: one for varying a, one for varying b, and one for varying c.

Can someone please help me with a procedure of how to do this?

Thanks in advance.

I have a relatively complicated ODE that i am plotting. One of the variables in particular (B[2211], purple line in the graph) should under go an exponential-like decay to zero, but instead flies off into negative territory  (see graph below) despite having a very simple equation:

problem variable rate of change= -problem variable*constant +linear combination of variables that  are always posotive.

My intuition is that this is because i have somehow used the odeplot tool wrong - possibly due to a problem with stepsizes.

Here is a MWE i've made:

aa_problem_MWE.mw

Let say I want to generate polynomail with unknown coefficients of variable (x,y,z,t,s) of 3-th order (NOT RANDOM ONE!).

Hey!

The more "nodes, compartments, ..." I define the longer my formula (see below) gets. The formula posted below is written for a starting situation of 9 nodes (i,j,k,l,m,p,q,r,s). The problem that I have is that, besides running out of letters to chose from, the formula is getting to long and is not clear anymore (losing the overview). So I'm looking for a way to write it shorter, especially for the bold parts I assume there must be a better way.

B is a 9x9 matrix, n[0]:=1, N:=9

for i in n[0] do for j to N do for k to N do for l to N do for m to N do for o to N do for q to N do for r to N do for s to N do

if B(i, j) = 1 and B(j, k) = 1 and B(k, l) = 1 and B(l, m) = 1 and B(m, o) = 1 and B(o, q) = 1 and B(q, r) = 1 and B(r, s) = 1 and i <> j and i <> k and i <> l and i <> m and i <> o and i <> q and i <> r and i <> s and j <> k and j <> l and j <> m and j <> o and j <> q and j <> r and j <> s and k <> l and k <> m and k <> o and k <> q and k <> r and k <> s and l <> m and l <> o and l <> q and l <> r and l <> s and m <> o and m <> q and m <> r and m <> s and o <> q and o <> r and o <> s and q <> r and q <> s and r <> s

then P[loss, i, j, k, l, m, o, q, r, s] := P[loss, i, j, k, l, m, o, q, r]*P[fw, r, s]*P[suppr, i, j, k, l, m, o, q, r]*P[fo, s] else P[loss, i, j, k, l, m, o, q, r] := 0 end if; if P[loss, i, j, k, l, m, o, q, r] <> 0 then print(subs(I = i, J = j, K = k, L = l, M = m, O = o, Q = q, R = r, 'P[loss, I, J, K, L, M, O, Q, R]') = P[loss, i, j, k, l, m, o, q, r]) end if end do end do end do end do end do end do end do end do end do

I tried i<>j<>k<>l<>m<>o<>p<>q<>r<>s but that does't work

P.S.: Do you always have to specify something after ELSE using the IF loop? Actually I just don't want maple to do anything if the conditions are not met but since I then cannot print only the solutions I want (the ones for which the conditions are met) I always end up specifying something after else.

Thanks!!

This is about the recent implementation of tensor products of quantum state spaces in the Physics package, in connection with an exchange with the Physics of Information Lab of the University of Waterloo. As usual this development is available to everybody from the Maplesoft R&D Physics webpage. This is the last update for Maple 2017. The updates for Maple 2018, starting with this same material, will begin being distributed through the MapleCloud next week.

Download TensorProductDesign.mw
 

Edgardo S. Cheb-Terrab
Physics, Differential Equations and Mathematical Functions, Maplesoft

Does any one know of a trick to make Maple solve this PDE using pdsolve?

restart;
pde:=diff(u(x,t),t)+diff(u(x,t),x)=0;
bc:=u(0,t)=0;
ic:=u(x,0)=x;
sol:=pdsolve({pde,ic,bc},u(x,t));

I have tried all HINTS and assumptions and Maple just returns () as solution.

Mathematica solve this as follows

ClearAll[u,x,t];
pde=D[u[x,t],t]+D[u[x,t],x]==0;
bc=u[0,t]==0;
ic=u[x,0]==x;
sol=DSolve[{pde,ic,bc},u[x,t],{x,t}]

Heavidside theta is basically a unit step function.

Download nn.mw
 

Download nn.mwnn.mw