Maple Questions and Posts

These are Posts and Questions associated with the product, Maple

Can anyone help me to transform a system of ODE into a power series solution. The system of ODE is as follows:

diff(f(eta), eta, eta, eta)+(diff(f(eta), eta, eta))*f(eta)+1 - (diff(f(eta), eta))^2=0

f(eta)*(diff(theta(eta), eta))+(1/Pr)*diff(theta(eta), eta, eta)=0

where Pr is the prendtl no.

I have an ipad air 16G running ios 7.0.4 and downloaded the MaplePlayer APP.  t seems to crash on several of the routines for example, "Approximaing Sphere" and "Linear System Tutor". The app was last updated in 2011.  Do you have plans to any upgrades plan in the near future?

I have an ipad air 16G running ios 7.0.4 and downloaded the MaplePlayer APP.  t seems to crash on several of the routines for example, "Approximaing Sphere" and "Linear System Tutor". The app was last updated in 2011.  Do you have plans to any upgrades plan in the near future?

I want to know which other maple in-built function does the same thing as fsolve and LinearSolve. I can use both to solve systems of equations either by passing the equations directly to fsolve or deciding to generate matrix to be used in LinearSolve while still getting the same result. So, i'm using this medium to ask if there are/is other inbuilt function that does the same/similar thing as the two.

I am using Maple 16, and trying to display several 3d plots simultaneously in a maplet (e.g. a line and a plane, etc.).  Whenever I use the "display" command the Plotter gives me 2-d axes.  

How can I get the display command to work in Maplets?

For example:

returns the axes in a plane, whereas

returns two surfaces (here the text fields are functions of x and y).

Thanks for any help you can give,

Rollie

hello,

I'm trying to solve the equation of a form like,

diff(eta(tau), tau, tau)+(8/(4*tau^2+1)-32/(4*tau^2+1)^2)*eta(tau) = 0,

when I'm doing solve DE, I get a solution as:=

eta(tau) = _C1*sqrt(4*tau^2+1)*LegendreP((1/2*I)*sqrt(7)-1/2, I*sqrt(7), (2*I)*tau)+_C2*sqrt(4*tau^2+1)*LegendreQ((1/2*I)*sqrt(7)-1/2, I*sqrt(7), (2*I)*tau

which is combination of Legendre Polynomials with imaginary arguments,May I change this form,

How can I plot this solution on real plane, as this is imaginary,

Is the only option remaining NUMERIC PLOT??

Hi MaplePrimers,

I'm trying to solve a system of algebraic equations using 'solve' [float].  I'd prefer to use 'solve' over 'fsolve', as 'solve' solves my system in about 0.05s, whereas fsolve takes about 5 seconds.  I need to solve the system repeatedly at a different points, so time is important.  I don't know why there is such a large difference in time ... 

I have a few piecewise functions of order 3 to 5.  It solves fine with the other (piecewise) equations, but adding one piecewise function which gives me an error while trying to solve:

Error, (in RootOf) _Z occurs but is not the dependent variable.

I think this is due to solve finding multiple solutions.  Is there a way to limit solve to only real solutions?

Thanks in advance!

my_sol.mw

Leonhard is playing a casino game. He places his bet and then rolls a
pair of dice: if the dice sum to 7, 8 or 9 then Leonhard wins the amount of his
bet, and otherwise Leonhard loses his money. Leonhard begins with $100 and
decides to bet $50 at time, until he has either won $100 or has gone broke. What
are the chances that Leonhard leaves the casino a winner?

My soln doesn't agree with the stated answer..25/74

Has anyone else seen the following behavior in Maple 16 and/or 17? In worksheet mode, with 2-D math notation, after hitting <enter> to execute a line several times, the software switches, without warning and unrepeatably, to a mode where only the arrows work -and that is to scroll the sheet. This means the <enter> command is no longer recognized.

My only solution has been to click on the line with the mouse, for which it returns to input mode. This behavior started in version 16 and I switched back to 15. However, I prefer features of 17 such as the different subscript options, that I would like to stay in 17.

I note this behavior occurs on both my Windows based machines and have seen it on students' Mac based machines. We use a common site licence at our institution and I wonder if that might be the problem.

In short - it is a pain.

(Yes, I did try to look for other posters with a similar problem, but failed. )

"Error, (in CheapestPaths) too many levels of recursion"

I received this message after trying to execute Zeilberg's GetMicrosoftJob program found here: http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/tokhniot/GetMicrosoftJob but don't know the cause. Any ideas?


I have following expression:

y1:=t->1/(4*cosh(t)^2)

I:=int(y1(t)^2,t=-T/2..T/2)

Now I tried:

MultiSeries:-asympt(I,T,5)

for which I only get the highest order.

Can I increase the order in any way?

Hello, please i would like someone to please explain Hermite Polynomial for me. I have zero knowledge of this and if possible give examples and references. Also, on how to Normalize Hermite Polynomial and Ortogonarity of Hermite Polynomial. Thanks

Dear people in this board.

I couldn't solve the following equation.

restart;

solve(gamma*(sigma/(sigma-1))=1,gamma);

On the other hand, I could solve

solve(alpha*(sigma/(sigma-1))=1,alpha);

Error message was 

Error, (in solve) a constant is invalid as a variable, gamma

Why does this sort of things happen?

I hope that you will tell me about this.

Tahnk you in advance.

 

taro 

 

 

 

Hi

I  have a system of second order differential equation to be solved numerically. I would like to set up events to halt integration  to find the values of phi when r(phi)=2/3 . Here is my code

DE:=diff(1/r(phi),phi,phi)+(1/r(phi))=(G*M/h^2)+(3*G*M/c^2*r(phi)^2));

ics:=r(0)=2/3,D(r)(0)=0;G:=1;M:=1;h:=1;c:=1;

p:=dsolve({DE,ics},numeric,events=[[r(phi),r(phi),halt]],[diff(r(phi),phi)=0,halt]]);

The code only works for the second event so it halts for r(phi)=1.63... etc

How do i stop this?

 

Thanks for any help.

I have a list of the structure like

['true', ['true','false'], ['true',['false','true'],'false'],...]

Is it possible to complete 'and' operation with all elements of list without knowing exact structure of list?

First 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 Last Page 1426 of 2261