MaplePrimes Questions

Hello everyone,

I am having trouble with this a system of 12 differential equations with the respective 12 initial conditions. I try to usen dsolve with the "numeric" parameter but it stays "evaluating" forever. I tried a system of 10 equation and I got the correct answer, although the program stayed calculating for several minutes (more or less 5 minutes). Is the size of this system too much to handle for the program? 

This is the system of differential equations (sys) and the initial conditions (ics) that I am trying to solve:

maple_primes_question.mw

sys := {diff(a[0](t), t)-(diff(a[1](t), t))+diff(a[2](t), t)-(diff(a[3](t), t))+diff(a[4](t), t)-(diff(a[5](t), t)) = 0, diff(b[0](t), t)+diff(b[1](t), t)+diff(b[2](t), t)+diff(b[3](t), t)+diff(b[4](t), t)+diff(b[5](t), t) = 0, diff(a[0](t), t)-.8090169943*(diff(a[1](t), t))+.309016994*(diff(a[2](t), t))-16*a[2](t)+.3090169950*(diff(a[3](t), t))+77.66563145*a[3](t)-.809016994*(diff(a[4](t), t))-187.3312629*a[4](t)+1.000000002*(diff(a[5](t), t))+289.4427191*a[5](t) = 0, diff(a[0](t), t)-.3090169938*(diff(a[1](t), t))-.8090169951*(diff(a[2](t), t))-16*a[2](t)+.8090169933*(diff(a[3](t), t))+29.66563140*a[3](t)+.3090169967*(diff(a[4](t), t))+27.33126306*a[4](t)-1.000000000*(diff(a[5](t), t))-110.5572808*a[5](t) = 0, diff(a[0](t), t)+.3090169938*(diff(a[1](t), t))-.8090169951*(diff(a[2](t), t))-16*a[2](t)-.8090169933*(diff(a[3](t), t))-29.66563140*a[3](t)+.3090169967*(diff(a[4](t), t))+27.33126306*a[4](t)+1.000000000*(diff(a[5](t), t))+110.5572808*a[5](t) = 0, diff(a[0](t), t)+.8090169943*(diff(a[1](t), t))+.309016994*(diff(a[2](t), t))-16*a[2](t)-.3090169950*(diff(a[3](t), t))-77.66563145*a[3](t)-.809016994*(diff(a[4](t), t))-187.3312629*a[4](t)-1.000000002*(diff(a[5](t), t))-289.4427191*a[5](t) = 0, diff(a[1](t), t)+4*(diff(a[2](t), t))+9*(diff(a[3](t), t))+16*(diff(a[4](t), t))+25*(diff(a[5](t), t))-3*(diff(b[1](t), t))+12*(diff(b[2](t), t))-27*(diff(b[3](t), t))+48*(diff(b[4](t), t))-75*(diff(b[5](t), t)) = 0, diff(b[0](t), t)-.8090169943*(diff(b[1](t), t))+.309016994*(diff(b[2](t), t))-48*b[2](t)+.3090169950*(diff(b[3](t), t))+232.9968944*b[3](t)-.809016994*(diff(b[4](t), t))-561.9937886*b[4](t)+1.000000002*(diff(b[5](t), t))+868.3281572*b[5](t) = 0, diff(b[0](t), t)-.3090169938*(diff(b[1](t), t))-.8090169951*(diff(b[2](t), t))-48*b[2](t)+.8090169933*(diff(b[3](t), t))+88.99689421*b[3](t)+.3090169967*(diff(b[4](t), t))+81.99378917*b[4](t)-1.000000000*(diff(b[5](t), t))-331.6718425*b[5](t) = 0, diff(b[0](t), t)+.3090169938*(diff(b[1](t), t))-.8090169951*(diff(b[2](t), t))-48*b[2](t)-.8090169933*(diff(b[3](t), t))-88.99689421*b[3](t)+.3090169967*(diff(b[4](t), t))+81.99378917*b[4](t)+1.000000000*(diff(b[5](t), t))+331.6718425*b[5](t) = 0, diff(b[0](t), t)+.8090169943*(diff(b[1](t), t))+.309016994*(diff(b[2](t), t))-48*b[2](t)-.3090169950*(diff(b[3](t), t))-232.9968944*b[3](t)-.809016994*(diff(b[4](t), t))-561.9937886*b[4](t)-1.000000002*(diff(b[5](t), t))-868.3281572*b[5](t) = 0, diff(a[0](t), t)+diff(a[1](t), t)+diff(a[2](t), t)+diff(a[3](t), t)+diff(a[4](t), t)+diff(a[5](t), t)-(diff(b[0](t), t))+diff(b[1](t), t)-(diff(b[2](t), t))+diff(b[3](t), t)-(diff(b[4](t), t))+diff(b[5](t), t) = 0}

ics := {a[0](0) = 0.7499999990e-1, a[1](0) = .1500000001, a[2](0) = .1500000002, a[3](0) = .1500000000, a[4](0) = .1499999999, a[5](0) = 0.7499999987e-1, b[0](0) = .9750000000, b[1](0) = 0.5000000005e-1, b[2](0) = -0.5000000005e-1, b[3](0) = 0.5000000000e-1, b[4](0) = -0.4999999998e-1, b[5](0) = 0.2499999996e-1}
sols := dsolve(`union`(sys, ics), numeric)

Download maple_primes_question.mw

What am I doing wrong? or is it that the program cannot handle such a large system? In that case, that would be dissappointing since I have to solve a similar system but with up to 22 differential equations and initial conditions so I am stuck...

Anyway, thank you very much for any guidance, and happy new year.

 A:= <x1,y1,z1>:  B:= <x2,y2,z2>:  P :=<x3, y3, z3>:  H:=A+t*(B-A):  solve( (P-H)^+ . (B-A), t ):  'H'=eval(H, t=`%` );

Error, invalid powe, rhow to overcome this mistake ? Thank you.
Typesetting:-mambiguous( AAssign (x1commay1commaz1)colon  BAssign 

  (x2commay2commaz2)colon  P Assign(x3comma y3comma z3)colon  H

  AssignA + tast(Buminus0A)colon  solveApplyFunction( 

  Typesetting:-mambiguous((Puminus0H)circ + , 

  Typesetting:-merror("invalid power")) period (Buminus0A)comma t

   )colon  (H)equalsevalApplyFunction(Hcomma tequals% )semi)

Simple question I cannot remember the solution of.

When I import "executable maple input" from a file, the content is imported as a string and therefore have quotation marks around the code if saved in a variable. It therefore wont execute.

How do you defeat quotation marks around  executable maple code with a command in order to execute the code ?

hello dear maple, in the following code (code attached at the bottom )

I'm curious to know if it's possible to show the product of two matrices  in an unevaluated form, so for instance something like this instead of this 

UnEval_Mat.mw

Thanks in advance

hello maple world, in the following code (code attached at the bottom) i wish to select the terms which have the term so i used the "select" command for this task

but as u can see from the results it also selects other terms which is wrong. so what is the mistake here

thanks in advance

Physic_select.mw

Hi everyone,

I have been trying to solve a system of 8 differential equations (1st order) with 8 different initial conditions. The system in question is the following.

sys:={

diff(a[0](t), t) - diff(a[1](t), t) + diff(a[2](t), t) - diff(a[3](t), t) = 0,

diff(b[0](t), t) + diff(b[1](t), t) + diff(b[2](t), t) + diff(b[3](t), t) = 0,

diff(a[0](t), t) + diff(a[1](t), t) + diff(a[2](t), t) + diff(a[3](t), t) - diff(b[0](t), t) + diff(b[1](t), t) - diff(b[2](t), t) + diff(b[3](t), t) = 0,

diff(a[1](t), t) + 4*diff(a[2](t), t) + 9*diff(a[3](t), t) - 3*diff(b[1](t), t) + 12*diff(b[2](t), t) - 27*diff(b[3](t), t) = 0,

diff(a[0](t), t) - diff(a[1](t), t)/2 - diff(a[2](t), t)/2 - 16*a[2](t) + diff(a[3](t), t) + 48*a[3](t) = 0,

diff(a[0](t), t) + diff(a[1](t), t)/2 - diff(a[2](t), t)/2 - 16*a[2](t) - diff(a[3](t), t) - 48*a[3](t) = 0,

diff(b[0](t), t) - diff(b[1](t), t)/2 - diff(b[2](t), t)/2 - 48*b[2](t) + diff(b[3](t), t) + 144*b[3](t) = 0,

diff(b[0](t), t) - diff(b[1](t), t)/2 - diff(b[2](t), t)/2 - 48*b[2](t) + diff(b[3](t), t) + 144*b[3](t) = 0}

and the initial conditions are

ics:={a[0](0) = 1/8, a[1](0) = 1/4, a[2](0) = 1/4, a[3](0) = 1/8, b[0](0) = 23/24, b[1](0) = 1/12, b[2](0) = -1/12, b[3](0) = 1/24}

When I run 

sols := dsolve(sys union ics, numeric)

I get the error message

Error, (in DEtools/convertsys) ODE system is insufficient to determine values for all dependent variables in the system

What is happening?

Thanks for the help.

Hey guys. i recently faced a problem where i needed to substitute the "physics's overloaded product operator" , namely with normal matrice product (`.`), so maple can do the matrice product calculation after my non-commutative physics operator(yellow symbols in the following code) has been replaced with real matrices (for instance, this substitution:)

now in order to substitute  with `.` I have utilized the maple `use` command. but the problem is, it doesn't do the substitution when I utilized `use` command as follows (code file is attached at the bottom) :

so what's the mistake here?

thanks in advance

Physic_subs.mw

Let's say we have a velocity vector v := c _i + d _j, where _i and _j are the i hat and j hat Cartesian basis vectors as present in the Physics[Vectors] package.

When we integrate this velocity vector relative to t, the result in maple is the position vector (c _i + d _j)t.

I guess that is correct.

My question is: is there am in-built way to specify an initial position vector for the integration? Ie, can I specify constants in the integration?

Right now I am just doing 

s0 := sx _i + sy _j

s:= int(v, t) + s0

I've been trying to figure out what i_  means in Maple. In what follows is some experimentation and then my questions.

Just a few initial experiments without loading any packages.

i_

i_

(1)

i_ = i_NULL

_i

_i

(2)

_i = _iNULL

D(_i)

D(_i)

(3)

f := proc (t) options operator, arrow; _i end proc

proc (t) options operator, arrow; _i end proc

(4)

D(f)

0

(5)

f := proc (t) options operator, arrow; t*_i end proc

proc (t) options operator, arrow; t*_i end proc

(6)

D(f)

proc (t) options operator, arrow; _i end proc

(7)

D(t*_i)

D(t)*_i+t*D(_i)

(8)

Impression: _i is treated like an algebraic basis vector when the result of a function; but not in an expression.

NULL

with(Physics)

_i

_i

(9)

_i = _iNULL

D(_i)

D(_i)

(10)

f := proc (t) options operator, arrow; t*_i end proc

proc (t) options operator, arrow; Physics:-`*`(t, _i) end proc

(11)

D(f)

proc (t) options operator, arrow; _i end proc

(12)

Nothing really seemed to change with the Physics package being used. However, if we use the following package

with(Physics[Vectors])

_i

_i

(13)

i_

i_

(14)

_i = _iNULL

i_ = i_NULL

In the middle of v__0 := v__x0*_i = v__x0*_i text. Doesn't work as expected.

In the middle of v__0 = v__x0*_i = v__x0*_i = v__x0*_i text.

 

NULL

My question is: is the symbol _i somehow special by default? Where can I find it in the documentation?

Note the second-to-last line in the Maple document pasted above: "Doesn't work as expected". The difference between this line and the next one is simply the presence of a := instead of an =. The assignment makes the vector notation differ. Is this difference a bug or some feature I am unaware of?

Here is yet another behavior that seems kinda weird to me. Given the function f defined above, D(f) gives us the expected result but D(f(x)) does not. Yet, int(f) gives an error, and we have to use int(f(x))

EDIT: a little more research indicates there is a difference between the operator and the function diff. 

Download PhysicsVectors.mw

Reading another question today I discovered that I can use syntax like

a := 2 _i + 3 _j

b:= _i - _j

a+b  

Maple computes the sum by vector component. This is very useful, and it prompted me to start reading the Multivariate Calculus Study Guide. I am still going through it but haven't seen this particular notation yet. When I check the type of above I get a result that sort of looks like `+` but actually it seems to be tilted to the right (so I guess it is italicized and represents some symbol).

What is this type?

I don't find much searching online, and I did see this page that says 

"Any symbol beginning with an underscore (_) is effectively reserved for use only by library code. It is not available to users. Failure to observe this rule can lead to unexpected results."

Edit: After a bit more looking, looks like my example code is using notation available from the Physics package, which I am now reading a bit about (but it is not clear to my why this package is used since I am not importing it explicitly).

I noticed something that seems to be new to my usage of Maple.

As I am typing in an expression in a Maple Worksheet (Document Mode), it seems Maple goes into "Evaluating" for a split second on every new keystroke.

For context, I have my own worksheet open and also the Maple Study Guide open for Multivariate Calculus. But just now I closed it and restarted Maple. A brand new worksheet has this same behavior. 

Did I just miss this before or is it normal for Maple to show "Evaluating" for a split second on every keystroke (instead of just "Ready")?

I just wrote up a bug report (aka "Software Change Request") but got a "We are currently experiencing technical difficulties" error so the report is not being sent.

I will just post here about the bug in case anyone knows what it is.

I am going through the Multivariate Calculus Study Guide. I went to section 1.1, and was going through the examples. At the end of an example is a link "Next Example", but when I click this I get an error and have to go back to section 1.1 Table of Contents. Kind of annoying. Also, I notice that Maple simply crashes seemingly randomly when going through this study guide. Very annoying.

Here is a screenshot of the write-up to the bug report service that isn't working, for the record

I was wondering if this is something wrong with my Maple installation or if other people experience it too.

I was just trying to follow along the Multivariate Calculus Study Guide.

There is an example where we are supposed to plot a "rooted vector". Basically, a vector where the tail is not at the origin.

The commands seemed pretty straightforward but are not generating the expected results. Here is a worksheet with the commands in question

w := VectorCalculus:-RootedVector(root = [-2, 1], `<,>`(1, 2))

Vector[column](%id = 36893488152235632508)

(1)

VectorCalculus:-PlotVector(w, scaling = constrained)

 

VectorCalculus:-PlotVector(w)

 

NULL


Well wouldn't ya know? I am finally able to execute a worksheet in this question box. As you can see there is no vector being displayed. Now, after playing around with the values a bit, it seems that the root that I chose, [-2,1], seems to be the only one that won't work. In particular, the value 1 there seems to be problematic. If I use any other value (including for example 0.9999999), the vector seems to be drawn correctly. 

Why doesn't it work for the original parameters I chose?

Download PlotRootedVector.mw

For instance, given an adjacency matrix: 

convert([[1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0,
1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0,
0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1,
0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 1, 0, 0]], Matrix): # adjacency

The desired diagram resembles:

The first one comes from Mathematica; the second one comes from MATLAB.
In MMA, we can use GraphLayout -> "LayeredDigraphEmbedding"; in MatLab, we can use Layout = "layered". Note that overlapping edges should be avoided in a layered plot.

Currently, since the vertices of a 2-D graph can be manually positioned, we can click, drag and place them to embed vertices, route edges, and then get a hierarchical structure as follows:

However, it's just a clumsy and fiddly job. Isn't there a fully automatic and less time-consuming method to do so in Maple?

                                                                                  Théorème de Brianchon
restart; with(plots):unprotect(gamma):
Error, missing operator or `;`
##Si un hexagone est circonscrit à un cercle, les droites qui joignent les sommets opposés passent par un même point.
_EnvHorizontalName := 'x';_EnvVerticalName := 'y';
                    _EnvHorizontalName := x

                     _EnvVerticalName := y

line := proc (x1, y1, x2, y2) options operator, arrow; (x-x1)*(y2-y1)-(y-y1)*(x2-x1) end proc:
R := 3:
ang := [0, (1/3)*Pi, 3*Pi*(1/4)+.2, 7*Pi*(1/6)+.4, 8*Pi*(1/5), 13*Pi*(1/7)]:
for i to 6 do P || i := [R*cos(ang[i]), R*sin(ang[i])] end do:
pts := [seq(P || i, i = 1 .. 6)]:
for i to 6 do tang || i := x*P || i[1]+y*P || i[2] = R^2 end do:
sol:=solve({tang1,tang3},{x,y}):Q13:=[subs(sol,x),subs(sol,y)]:
sol := solve({tang1, tang2}, {x, y}): Q1 := [subs(sol, x), subs(sol, y)]:
sol := solve({tang2, tang3}, {x, y}): Q2 := [subs(sol, x), subs(sol, y)]:
sol := solve({tang3, tang4}, {x, y}): Q3 := [subs(sol, x), subs(sol, y)]:
sol := solve({tang4, tang5}, {x, y}): Q4 := [subs(sol, x), subs(sol, y)]:
sol := solve({tang5, tang6}, {x, y}): Q5 := [subs(sol, x), subs(sol, y)]:
sol := solve({tang1, tang6}, {x, y}): Q6 := [subs(sol, x), subs(sol, y)]:
ptQ := [seq(Q || i, i = 1 .. 6)]:
line14 := line(Q1[1], Q1[2], Q4[1], Q4[2]): L14 := implicitplot(line14, x = -10 .. 10, y = -10 .. 10, color = red):
line25 := line(Q2[1], Q2[2], Q5[1], Q5[2]): L25 := implicitplot(line25, x = -10 .. 10, y = -10 .. 10, color = red):
line36 := line(Q3[1], Q3[2], Q6[1], Q6[2]): L36 := implicitplot(line36, x = -10 .. 10, y = -10 .. 10, color = red):
sol := solve({line14, line25}, {x, y}): I1 := [subs(sol, x), subs(sol, y)]:

lineP23 := line(P2[1], P2[2], P3[1], P3[2]): lineP56 := line(P5[1], P5[2], P6[1], P6[2]):
sol := solve({lineP23, lineP56}, {x, y}): gamma := [subs(sol, x), subs(sol, y)]:
Error, attempting to assign to `gamma` which is protected.  Try declaring `local gamma`; see ?protect for details.
lineP12 := line(P1[1], P1[2], P2[1], P2[2]): lineP45 := line(P4[1], P4[2], P5[1], P5[2]):
sol := solve({lineP12, lineP45}, {x, y}): beta := [subs(sol, x), subs(sol, y)]:
lineP34 := line(P3[1], P3[2], P4[1], P4[2]): lineP16 := line(P1[1], P1[2], P6[1], P6[2]):
sol := solve({lineP16, lineP34}, {x, y}): alpha := [subs(sol, x), subs(sol, y)]:
pl:= line(alpha[1], alpha[2], gamma[1], gamma[2]):
hexa := seq(implicitplot(tang||i, x = -20 .. 20, y = -20 .. 20, linestyle=3,color = blue),i=1..6);
hexa:=plot([seq([P||i,P||(i mod 6)+1],i=1..6),color=green); 
hexa:=plot([seq([P||i,P||(i+1)],i=1..6)],thickness=4,color=green); 
hex:=plot([[Q1,Q2],[Q2,Q3],[Q3,Q4],[Q4,Q5],[Q5,Q6],[Q6,Q1]],thickness=4,color=green);
tp := textplot({seq([op(pts[i]), cat("P", i)], i = 1 .. 6)}, 'align' = {'above', 'left'});
tpq := textplot({seq([op(ptQ[i]), cat("Q", i)], i = 1 .. 6)}, 'align' = {'above', 'left'});
TP:=textplot([[I1[],"I"],[alpha[],"alpha"],[beta[],"beta"],[gamma[],"gamma"]],'align' = {'above', 'left'});
slopes:=[seq(((dx,dy)->dy/dx)((pts[i]-pts[(i mod 6)+1])[]),i=1..6)];
lines:=zip((pt,slope)->y=slope*(x-pt[1])+pt[2],pts,slopes);
plotpts:=plot(pts,style=point,colour=red,symbol=solidcircle,symbolsize=5);
plotptQ:=plot(ptQ,style=point,colour=black,symbol=solidcircle,symbolsize=5);
plotlines:=plot(rhs~(lines),style=line,linestyle=3,colour=magenta);
cir:=implicitplot(x^2+y^2=R^2,x=-R..R,y=-R..R,color=black);
PL:=implicitplot(pl,x=-1..15,y=-15..6,color=blue,thickness=3);

 hexa := implicitplot(tang1, x = -20 .. 20, y = -20 .. 20, 

   linestyle = 3, color = blue), implicitplot(tang2, 

   x = -20 .. 20, y = -20 .. 20, linestyle = 3, color = blue), 

   implicitplot(tang3, x = -20 .. 20, y = -20 .. 20, 

   linestyle = 3, color = blue), implicitplot(tang4, 

   x = -20 .. 20, y = -20 .. 20, linestyle = 3, color = blue), 

   implicitplot(tang5, x = -20 .. 20, y = -20 .. 20, 

   linestyle = 3, color = blue), implicitplot(tang6, 

   x = -20 .. 20, y = -20 .. 20, linestyle = 3, color = blue)


Error, `)` unexpected
display(plotpts,plotptQ,plotlines,hex,cir,L14,L25,L36,PL,tp,tpq,TP,axis = [gridlines = [4, color = blue]],
view=[-6..10,-15..6],scaling=constrained,axes=none,size=[800,800]);
display(plotpts, plotptQ, plotlines, hex, cir, 

  implicitplot(0, x = -10 .. 10, y = -10 .. 10, color = red), 

  implicitplot(0, x = -10 .. 10, y = -10 .. 10, color = red), 

  implicitplot(0, x = -10 .. 10, y = -10 .. 10, color = red), PL, 

  tp, tpq, TP, axis = [gridlines = [4, color = blue]], 

  view = [-6 .. 10, -15 .. 6], scaling = constrained, 

  axes = none, size = [800, 800])


NULL;
I don’t know how to correct those mistakes. Thank you to help me.

First 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 Last Page 251 of 2431