In Maple, an expression of type `*` can have many operands. I need to break it to product of two operands only.

For example given, expr:=A*B*C, I want first_part to be A and second_part to B*C

The way I do it now is clumsy.

I first check if expression is of type `*`, then use first_part :=op(1,expr) to find the first term, then divide the expression by that first term to find the second part. second_part:=expr/first_part

second_part:=op(2..nops(expr)) does not exaclty works, since it gives me B,C instead of B*C.

What would be a good way to do this? Notice that expr:=-A is actually a `*`, where first_part:=-1 and second_part:=A. Which is OK.

restart;
expr         := A*B*C;
first_part   := op(1,expr);
second_part  := expr/first_part;

How to draw a circle transfomed by orthogonal affinity to oblique line and k ration ? Thank you.

When I create a rooted vector 

v1:=RootedVector(root=[1,Pi/4,0],[0,0,1],spherical[r,theta,phi])

and a free vector

v2:=Vector([0,2,1],cartesian[x,y,z])

and dot product them

v1.v2

it gives me 2.

But if I change v1 to 

v1:=RootedVector(root=[1,Pi/6,0],[0,0,1],spherical[r,theta,phi])

the product of v1.v2 gives me an error

"..cannot combine two rooted vectors with different points of origin"

Can anyone explain me the problem? 

Here is what I understand: 

In spherical coordinates the unit vector e_r, e_th, e_ph are functions of theta and phi. So when I call root=[1,Pi/4,0] that means r=1, theta=Pi/4 and phi=0. This uniquely defines the unit vectors in spherical coordinates and r places the vector away in the e_r direction. The [0,0,1] then attaches a vector to the point r=1, theta=Pi/4 and phi=0  with only 1 unit along the e_ph direction.

What I don't understand is the concept of origin with the free vector and the rooted vector. How changing the theta from Pi/4 to Pi/6 makes the origin "different"? 

Edit: This is part of the VectorCalculus pacakge.

Hi:

How can I solve this system with numerical method:

eq1 := diff(f_n(zeta), zeta$2)-h_n(zeta)*(diff(f_n(zeta), zeta))-f_n(zeta)^2+g_n(zeta)^2 = 0;
eq2 := diff(g_n(zeta), zeta$2)-h_n(zeta)*(diff(g_n(zeta), zeta))-2*f_n(zeta)*g_n(zeta) = 0;
eq3 := 2*f_n(zeta)+diff(h_n(zeta), zeta) = 0;
ics := f_n(0) = 0, f_n(10) = 0, g_n(0) = 1, g_n(10) = 0, h_n(0) = 0;
tnx...

Hello

Maple is dangerously close to using all available memory on my Linux machine by doing a calculation using  Grid:-Seq (Map, ..).   Is there a way to control the amount of memory used? Is numcpus a good option?   Or tasksize? 

I expect that Maple will use a large amount of memory since the calculations are performed over a rather large list of sets.  

Many thanks.

Ed

[Moderator's note: The original version of this Question mentioned using both Grid and Threads. The following 5 Replys will not make sense without knowing that Threads was mentioned.

Ed: Editing your Questions is fine, but please don't remove information that is necessary to understand the Replys and/or Answers that are already posted.--Carl Love]

Hello 

I am having equation y(x) in 5 variable c1, c2, A, R and x.

I am not able to plot graph in x and y(x) for A=1, c1 = 2.3, c2 = 2.4 and R=0,2 5,9.

Range of x: -1..1

Caption :graph of y(x) at different value of R.

Legend: R=0, R=1, R=2, R=3.

my equation is

Download Ques1.mw

I have the numeric solution of differential equation and interpolate the data points with a spline of third degree. Is there a way of differentiating the spline as a whole? Differentiating every single polynom seems awkward.

 Help me please.  How can i simulate murmuration in maple.

Hi:

How can I solve the below ODE system in Maple?

sys_ode := diff(F0(zeta), zeta, zeta)-b^2*F0(zeta)+G0(zeta)^2 = 0, diff(G0(zeta), zeta, zeta)-b^2*G0(zeta) = 0, 2*F0(zeta)+diff(H0(zeta), zeta) = 0:
ics := F0(0) = 0, G0(0) = 1, H0(0) = 0, F0(infinity) = 0, G0(infinity) = 0:

Note: b is a constant.

tnx...

Hi everyone:

How can I earn the coefficients with P only in this equation? (No P^2 or P^3).

eq:=p*(diff(F1(zeta), zeta, zeta))-b^2*p*F1(zeta)+2*G0(zeta)*p*G1(zeta)+p^2*G1(zeta)^2-p*H0(zeta)*(diff(F0(zeta), zeta))-H0(zeta)*p^2*(diff(F1(zeta), zeta))-p^2*H1(zeta)*(diff(F0(zeta), zeta))-p^3*H1(zeta)*(diff(F1(zeta), zeta))-p*F0(zeta)^2-2*F0(zeta)*p^2*F1(zeta)-p^3*F1(zeta)^2+p*b^2*F0(zeta)+b^2*p^2*F1(zeta):

tnx...

Hi, 

I would like to enable/disable the Explore(plot(...), parameters=[...]) command according to some boolean value.
First idea (note that ending the previous command by : instead of ; doesn't prevent a figure to be displayed) was to encapsulated this Explore command within a conditional structure:
if T then Explore(...) end if.

But I prefered trying to define my own command by doing something like this:

EXPLORE := proc(TF::boolean)
  if TF then 
    Explore(_passed[2..-1])
  end if:
end proc:
with a call made this way:
EXPLORE(true, 'plot(a*x, x=0..1)', 'parameters=[a=-1.0 .. 1.0]');
wich ended with this error
Error, (in Explore) No parameters to explore

I also tried this without any more success:
EXPLORE := proc(TF::boolean)
  if TF then 
    Explore(_passed[1], parameters=_passed[2])
  end if:
end proc:
with a call made this way:
EXPLORE(true, 'plot(a*x, x=0..1)', [a=-1.0 .. 1.0]);
I get no more error but this warning and an inactive Explore
Warning, expecting only range variable x in expression a*x to be plotted but found name a

Can you help me to fix this?

Thanks in advance

ddesys := {diff(x(t), t, t) + 2/25*diff(x(t), t) + 4*x(t) = 1/25*diff(x(t), t, t)*piecewise(t - 6/7 < 0, cos(t - 6/7), x(t - 6/7)) + 2/3*diff(x(t), t)*piecewise(t - 6/7 < 0, cos(t - 6/7), x(t - 6/7)) + 5/2*piecewise(t - 6/7 < 0, cos(t - 6/7), x(t - 6/7)), h(t) = diff(x(t), t, t), x(0) = cos(0), z(t) = diff(x(t), t), D(x)(0) = -sin(0)}

tdsn := dsolve(ddesys, numeric):

plots[odeplot](tdsn, [[t, x(t), color = red]], 0 .. 20, labels = [t, ""]);

Hello,
I wish to make a simulation of a solution of  Neutral Delayed Differential  Equation (second order) whose initial condition is the history function cos(t) for t <0.
unfortunately Maple considers the history function as a constant and not a function, the simulation I tried to do by Maple is therefore not good.
Could somebody help me please ?

Download Free_Vibration_Euler_Bernouli_Beam_1.mw

I have tried to solve these 4 equations to get the characteristic equation and finally the solution of the PDE.  But it shows some error. Can you please help with this issue?

How to draw an ellipse in a rectangle ? Thank you.

Hello,

I tried to solve an inequality involving factorials using solve, but I failed. The code is 

solve(1/(n+1)!<0.0001,n)

n should be 7.

Maple returns me "Warning, solutions may have been lost" message. 

How can I solve an inequality like this using solve?

I worked around this with a for loop testing the value of the expression for every increasing value of n against the criteria. Is there a "magical" keyword that will help with solve?