Muhammad Usman

235 Reputation

5 Badges

11 years, 118 days
Beijing, China

MaplePrimes Activity


These are questions asked by Muhammad Usman

Dear Users!
I hope are fine here. I got the following expression after a lot of computations

((1/2)*r*(r-1)+(1/6)*r*(r-1)*(r-2))*`Δy`[-1]^3+(1/2)*r*(r-1)*`Δy`[-1]^2+(1/120)*r*(r-1)*(r-2)*(r-3)*(r-4)*`Δy`[-2]^7+((1/6)*r*(r-1)*(r-2)+(1/12)*r*(r-1)*(r-2)*(r-3)+(1/120)*r*(r-1)*(r-2)*(r-3)*(r-4))*`Δy`[-2]^5+((1/6)*r*(r-1)*(r-2)+(1/24)*r*(r-1)*(r-2)*(r-3))*`Δy`[-2]^4+((1/24)*r*(r-1)*(r-2)*(r-3)+(1/60)*r*(r-1)*(r-2)*(r-3)*(r-4))*`Δy`[-3]^7+((1/24)*r*(r-1)*(r-2)*(r-3)+(1/60)*r*(r-1)*(r-2)*(r-3)*(r-4))*`Δy`[-3]^6+r*`Δy`[0]+y[0]

Actually, for the above, I want the factorization of each coefficient of `Δy`[0], `Δy`[-1], `Δy`[-2] etc and the above expression shoud be in descending order given as:

y[0]+r*`Δy`[0]+(1/2)*r*(r-1)*`Δy`[-1]^2+(1/6)*r*(r-1)*(1+r)*`Δy`[-1]^3+(1/24)*r*(r-1)*(r-2)*(1+r)*`Δy`[-2]^4+(1/120)*r*(r-1)*(r-2)*(r+2)*(1+r)*`Δy`[-2]^5+(1/120)*r*(r-1)*(r-2)*(r-3)*(r-4)*`Δy`[-2]^7+(1/120)*r*(r-1)*(r-2)*(r-3)*(-3+2*r)*`Δy`[-3]^6+(1/120)*r*(r-1)*(r-2)*(r-3)*(-3+2*r)*`Δy`[-3]^7

I am waiting for your positive response. Thanks

Dear Users! Hope everyone is fine here. I have some points x_0,x_1,..,x_N and corresponding to these number have values y_0, _1, ..., y_N as,

restart
a := 1; b := 5; h := 1; f := 1/x; N := (b-a)/h;
for i from 0 while i <= N do x[i] := h*i+a; y[i] := eval(f, x = x[i]) end do;

Now I want to develope the following difference table using the values of y_0, y_1, ..., y_N as,

where difference column generated using the following concept

Please help me in this regard. Thanks in advance

Dear Users!

Hope everyone is fine here. Let me explain my problem first for this consider
diff(Y(xi), xi) = mu*(1-Y(xi)^2)
Then the derivative of a function U=u(Y(xi)) using chain rule (and expression menstiones as red) is given as,
diff(U, xi) = (diff(diff(Y, xi), Y))*U and (diff(diff(Y, xi), Y))*U = mu*(1-Y(xi)^2)*(diff(U, Y))
Similarly the second-order derivaitve of U=u(Y(xi)) using chain rule (and expression menstiones as red) is given as,
((&DifferentialD;)^(2))/(&DifferentialD; xi^(2))U=(&DifferentialD;)/(&DifferentialD; xi)(mu (1-Y^(2)(xi))*(&DifferentialD;)/(&DifferentialD; Y)U)=((&DifferentialD;)/(&DifferentialD; Y)*(&DifferentialD;)/(&DifferentialD; xi)Y)(mu (1-Y^(2)(xi))*(&DifferentialD;)/(&DifferentialD; Y)U)=(&DifferentialD;)/(&DifferentialD; Y)(mu^(2) (1-Y^(2)(xi))^(2)*(&DifferentialD;)/(&DifferentialD; Y)U)=-2 Y(xi) mu^(2) (1-Y^(2)(xi))*(&DifferentialD;)/(&DifferentialD; Y)U+ mu^(2) (1-Y^(2)(xi))^(2)*((&DifferentialD;)^(2))/(&DifferentialD; Y^(2))U;
In the similar way I want to compute the higher-order (like 5th order) derivaitve of U w.r.t. xi using the chain rule  (and expression menstiones as red) explained in above. Kindly help me soolve my problem

I am waiting for positive response.

Dear Users!

Hope you are doing well. I have a funtion give bellow:
beta[1]*exp(x*alpha[1]+y*beta[1]-z*sqrt(-alpha[1]^2-beta[1]^2))/(1+exp(x*alpha[1]+y*beta[1]-z*sqrt(-alpha[1]^2-beta[1]^2)));
For any value of alpha[1] and beta[1] the term highlighted red becomes the imaginary form. I want to separate the real and imaginary parts of this function. Kindly help me in this matter, thanks

Dear Useres!

Hope everyone is fine here! I want to compare the coeficient of exp(k*eta[3]+m*eta[1]+n*eta[2]) for k=0,1,2,3,...,N,n=0,1,2,3,...,N and m=0,1,2,3,...,N for N=10 in the following attached file. But I got some error, please have a look and try to fix it as early as possible. Please take care and thanks

Compare_coeff.mw

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Last Page 5 of 38