Advanced Search

Maple Questions and Posts

These are Posts and Questions associated with the product, Maple
View unanswered posts
Maple Questions and Posts Feed

where is tools->options in Maple 2025?...

Asked by: nm 11388
options gui ribbon
March 26 2025
2  3

Where is the tools->options  menu in Maple 2025? I can't find it. 

This is how it looks in Maple 2024:

 

I open new worksheet, but it is still uses math for input. I wanted to change that like I did in Maple 2024 to use Maple notation.

But do not see any options under tools in Maple 2025:

Windows 10.

 

Why do I get the warning solutions may have been l...

Asked by: Saalehorizontale 55
solve implicit rootof
March 26 2025
1  12

Hey guys, 

From a former calculation I got a set of points as a implicit RootOf function for an intervall. Now I want to check, if these points are in a certain area. So i thougt I take the RootOf function, the intervall and the inequalities (which describe the target area) and use the solve command. But then I get the warning, solutions may have been lost and no solution. When you draw the implicit function you can see thats in the right area (above y=1 and below y=x). So there should be a clear anwer, giving me back the whole RootOf function in the intervall.

Download QUESTI~2.MW

Since there was an error uploading the picture here the code 

restart;
Sol := {x = RootOf(_Z^2 - y, index = real[2]) + 1, 1 < y, y < 2};
area := {1 < y, y < x};
Sol_area := solve(Sol union area);
print(Sol_area);

So why do I get this warning, the calculation seems quite easy? And is there a workaround? Or a diffrent kind of solve function? SemiAlgebraic is as far as i know only for polynomials. So I got an error as well. Since the websites are down I could start an own reasearch before. So thank you in advance. 

Regards

Felix

What exactly is Maple 2025 for Screen Readers ...

Asked by: C_R 3442
gui
March 26 2025
2  0

I found this version after Maple 2025 installation in Windows programs menu. It looks like a fully functional Maple version using the old GUI.

Why is it called "for screen readers"? I do not understand the link to persons with disabilites (I assume that the icon stands for it)?
In which respect is the new GUI less suited for visually impaired(?) people? I think the readabilty of the new GUI is at least as good as the old GUI.

In case Maple 2025 for Screen Readers is a fully functional Maple version, I give two thumbs up to Maplesoft. Smart move not to immediately impose a "disruptive" new GUI with allot of potential for new users to everyone.

Using Solve for special variable leeds to missing ...

Asked by: Saalehorizontale 55
solve inequality
March 26 2025
0  2

Hey guys, 

I have a problem with the solve command. And since the websites are down, I cant help myself. I have a function x(y) and an intervall for y. This function or the set of points described by the function should now be transformed to another area of the plane. So now I can get a(x,y)=1/y and b(x,y)=x/(x+y-1) with just plugging in, then everything depeends from the y Invtervall. But I want to get the form b(a) and an intervall for a. So that I can see the function directly. So i thought I just put everything into the solve command and than ask for a solution for {a,b} and expected to get what I want. (Uploading the script here gives an error)
 

restart;
Sol := solve({a = 1/y, b = x/(x + y - 1), x = (y - 1)^2, 1 < y, y < 5/4});
Sol_ab := solve({a = 1/y, b = x/(x + y - 1), x = (y - 1)^2, 1 < y, y < 5/4}, {a, b});

#expected (or wanted) solution
#with y = 1/a and the inequalities we get 4/5 < a and a < 1 with y
#with y = we get x(a)/a and y(a) and reach b = 1/a - 1
#all together: Sol={b=1/a - 1, 4/4<a, a<1};

THe problem is, that I get an empty set which is obviously wrong. So I somehow make an error when making the variables I want concrete with adding {a,b}. What do I do wrong? Or is there a better command for what I want to achieve? In this case I can solve the problem via hand, but I have more complex tranformations and mor ecomplex functions x(y), so thats why I ask for general help with my problem. 

Thank ypu in advance

Felix

Download QUESTI~1.MW

Matlab (R2024b) connection does not work on Maple ...

Asked by: MichalKvasnicka 219
matlab
March 26 2025
2  3

On Ubuntu 24.04 or LinuxMint 22.1 (based on Ubuntu 24.04) I have the problem with(Matlab) funtions functionality

Matlab[openlink]();
Error, (in Matlab:-openlink) There was a problem initializing the Matlab engine. Refer to ?Matlab,setup for help configuring your system to work with the Matlab-link.  The error was: Maple/Matlab Link: Can't start Matlab engine; environment variable $MATLAB_BASEDIR not set

+ other error mesages from CLI:

starting mmatlink
In connectToMatlab
/bin/csh: /opt/MATLAB/R2024b/bin/glnxa64/libbsd.so.0: version `LIBBSD_0.7' not found (required by /bin/csh)

MATLAB R2024b using obsolete libbsd ver. 0.4.2 !!! So this is probably the problem...

$MATLAB_BASEDIR is properly defined at maple script:

# In order to link to MATLAB from within Maple, correct the following path
# and uncomment the next four lines, or define the environment variable,
# $MATLAB_BASEDIR outside this script.
if [ -z "$MATLAB_BASEDIR" ] ; then
MATLAB_BASEDIR=/opt/MATLAB/R2024b
export MATLAB_BASEDIR
fi

# C-shell is required for link to MATLAB (sudo apt install csh)

Any help???

What is wrong that the command solve does not disp...

Asked by: abdulganiy 145
solve
March 26 2025
0  5

Good day, all.

Please, I am working on the following code but found out that the command solve is not displaying any result. Your assistance and suggestions would be appreciated. Thank you, and best regards.

 

restart;
NULL;
t := sum(a[j]*q^j, j = 0 .. 9);
H := diff(t, q);
F := diff(t, q $ 2);
p1 := simplify(eval(t, q = x)) = y[n];
p2 := simplify(eval(F, q = x)) = f[n];
p3 := simplify(eval(F, q = x + h/4)) = f[n + 1/4];
p4 := simplify(eval(F, q = x + h/2)) = f[n + 1/2];
p5 := simplify(eval(F, q = x + (3*h)/4)) = f[n + 3/4];
p6 := simplify(eval(F, q = x + h)) = f[n + 1];
p7 := simplify(eval(F, q = x + (5*h)/4)) = f[n + 5/4];
p8 := simplify(eval(F, q = x + (3*h)/2)) = f[n + 3/2];
p9 := simplify(eval(F, q = x + (7*h)/4)) = f[n + 7/4];
p10 := simplify(eval(F, q = x + 2*h)) = f[n + 2];
r := seq(a[i], i = 0 .. 9);
s := p || (1 .. 10);

solve({s}, {r});

How find Auxiliary solution function by using seri...

Asked by: salim-barzani 1605
substitution pde series
March 26 2025
4  0

in a lot of paper i see that they just use the Auxiliary function without mention any detail but now i have to find out how i can reach this function, always i used u=Rdiff(ln(f),x#1,2) or u=Rdiff(ln(f),y,x)  (eq17) in mw. and it is answer for me untill now without knowing finding, but i have to figure out how they reach this in more than 1000 paper i didn't see any explanation about that they just used just in one of the paper mentioned something  like a series which i think they used this series but again is so complicated for undrestanding , i will put some problem picture and now i want to know how find them  eq17 for any equation based on the series in last picture mentioned

 

second example

third example which is so  different from other and i don't know how author reach this point 

i have to find this auxiliary function by using something like series  as mentioned in other question? how i can use this series for finding my auxiliary function u= u_0+R*diff(ln(f),x)  


 

#picture one

NULL

> 

restart
> 

with(PDEtools)
> 

with(LinearAlgebra)
> 

NULL
> 

with(SolveTools)
> 

_local(gamma)

Warning, A new binding for the name `gamma` has been created. The global instance of this name is still accessible using the :- prefix, :-`gamma`.  See ?protect for details.

  
> 

undeclare(prime)

`There is no more prime differentiation variable; all derivatives will be displayed as indexed functions`

 (1)
> 

declare(u(x, y, z, t))

u(x, y, z, t)*`will now be displayed as`*u

 (2)
> 

declare(f(x, y, z, t))

f(x, y, z, t)*`will now be displayed as`*f

 (3)
> 

pde := diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), t)+6*u(x, y, z, t)*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x))+diff(u(x, y, z, t), `$`(x, 3)), x)+diff(alpha*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x))+beta*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), y))+delta*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), z)), x)+mu*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), `$`(t, 2)))

diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), t), x)+6*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x))^2+6*u(x, y, z, t)*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), x))+diff(diff(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), x), x), x)+alpha*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), x))+beta*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), y))+delta*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), z))+mu*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), t), t))

 (4)
> 

pde_linear, pde_nonlinear := selectremove(proc (term) options operator, arrow; not has((eval(term, u(x, y, z, t) = a*u(x, y, z, t)))/a, a) end proc, expand(pde))

diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), t), x)+diff(diff(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), x), x), x)+alpha*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), x))+beta*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), y))+delta*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), z))+mu*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), t), t)), 6*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x))^2+6*u(x, y, z, t)*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), x))

 (5)
> 

thetai := k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i]; eval(pde_linear, u(x, y, z, t) = exp(thetai)); eq15 := isolate(%, w[i])

k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i]

  

k[i]^2*w[i]*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+k[i]^4*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+alpha*k[i]^2*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+beta*k[i]^2*l[i]*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+delta*k[i]^2*r[i]*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+mu*k[i]^2*w[i]^2*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])

  

w[i] = (1/2)*(-1+(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1)^(1/2))/mu

 (6)
> 

eqf := f(x, y, z, t) = 1+eval(exp(thetai), eq15)

f(x, y, z, t) = 1+exp(k[i]*((1/2)*t*(-1+(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1)^(1/2))/mu+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])

 (7)
> 

eq17 := u(x, y, z, t) = R*(diff(ln(f(x, y, z, t)), `$`(x, 2)))

u(x, y, z, t) = R*((diff(diff(f(x, y, z, t), x), x))/f(x, y, z, t)-(diff(f(x, y, z, t), x))^2/f(x, y, z, t)^2)

 (8)
> 

eval(eq17, eqf); simplify(eval(pde, %)); sort([solve(%, R)]); eq17 := eval(eq17, R = simplify(%[2]))

u(x, y, z, t) = R*(k[i]^2*exp(k[i]*((1/2)*t*(-1+(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1)^(1/2))/mu+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])/(1+exp(k[i]*((1/2)*t*(-1+(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1)^(1/2))/mu+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i]))-k[i]^2*(exp(k[i]*((1/2)*t*(-1+(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1)^(1/2))/mu+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i]))^2/(1+exp(k[i]*((1/2)*t*(-1+(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1)^(1/2))/mu+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i]))^2)

  

12*R*k[i]^6*exp(((1+(-4*beta*l[i]-4*delta*r[i]-4*k[i]^2-4*alpha)*mu)^(1/2)*t*k[i]+((2*y*l[i]+2*z*r[i]+2*x)*mu-t)*k[i]+2*eta[i]*mu)/mu)*(exp(((1+(-4*beta*l[i]-4*delta*r[i]-4*k[i]^2-4*alpha)*mu)^(1/2)*t*k[i]+((2*y*l[i]+2*z*r[i]+2*x)*mu-t)*k[i]+2*eta[i]*mu)/mu)-3*exp((1/2)*((1+(-4*beta*l[i]-4*delta*r[i]-4*k[i]^2-4*alpha)*mu)^(1/2)*t*k[i]+((2*y*l[i]+2*z*r[i]+2*x)*mu-t)*k[i]+2*eta[i]*mu)/mu)+1)*(R-2)/(1+exp((1/2)*((1+(-4*beta*l[i]-4*delta*r[i]-4*k[i]^2-4*alpha)*mu)^(1/2)*t*k[i]+((2*y*l[i]+2*z*r[i]+2*x)*mu-t)*k[i]+2*eta[i]*mu)/mu))^6

  

[0, 2]

  

u(x, y, z, t) = 2*(diff(diff(f(x, y, z, t), x), x))/f(x, y, z, t)-2*(diff(f(x, y, z, t), x))^2/f(x, y, z, t)^2

 (9)
> 

eq19 := eval(eq17, eqf)

u(x, y, z, t) = 2*k[i]^2*exp(k[i]*((1/2)*t*(-1+(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1)^(1/2))/mu+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])/(1+exp(k[i]*((1/2)*t*(-1+(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1)^(1/2))/mu+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i]))-2*k[i]^2*(exp(k[i]*((1/2)*t*(-1+(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1)^(1/2))/mu+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i]))^2/(1+exp(k[i]*((1/2)*t*(-1+(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1)^(1/2))/mu+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i]))^2

 (10)
> 

simplify(eq19)

u(x, y, z, t) = 2*k[i]^2*exp((1/2)*((1+(-4*beta*l[i]-4*delta*r[i]-4*k[i]^2-4*alpha)*mu)^(1/2)*t*k[i]+((2*y*l[i]+2*z*r[i]+2*x)*mu-t)*k[i]+2*eta[i]*mu)/mu)/(1+exp((1/2)*((1+(-4*beta*l[i]-4*delta*r[i]-4*k[i]^2-4*alpha)*mu)^(1/2)*t*k[i]+((2*y*l[i]+2*z*r[i]+2*x)*mu-t)*k[i]+2*eta[i]*mu)/mu))^2

 (11)
> 

pdetest(eq19, pde)

0

 (12)
> 

#second example
> 

NULL
> 

restart
> 

with(PDEtools)
> 

with(LinearAlgebra)
> 

NULL
> 

with(SolveTools)
> 

_local(gamma)
> 

``

`There is no more prime differentiation variable; all derivatives will be displayed as indexed functions`

 (13)
> 

declare(u(x, y, t))

u(x, y, t)*`will now be displayed as`*u

 (14)
> 

declare(f(x, y, t))

f(x, y, t)*`will now be displayed as`*f

 (15)
> 

pde := diff(u(x, y, t), x, t)+alpha*(diff(u(x, y, t), `$`(x, 4))+6*(diff(u(x, y, t), x))*(diff(u(x, y, t), `$`(x, 2))))+beta*(diff(u(x, y, t), `$`(y, 2)))+a*(diff(u(x, y, t), `$`(x, 2)))+b*(diff(u(x, y, t), x, y))

diff(diff(u(x, y, t), t), x)+alpha*(diff(diff(diff(diff(u(x, y, t), x), x), x), x)+6*(diff(u(x, y, t), x))*(diff(diff(u(x, y, t), x), x)))+beta*(diff(diff(u(x, y, t), y), y))+a*(diff(diff(u(x, y, t), x), x))+b*(diff(diff(u(x, y, t), x), y))

 (16)
> 

oppde := [op(expand(pde))]; u_occurrences := map(proc (i) options operator, arrow; numelems(select(has, [op([op(i)])], u)) end proc, oppde); linear_op_indices := ListTools:-SearchAll(1, u_occurrences); pde_linear := add(oppde[[linear_op_indices]]); pde_nonlinear := expand(simplify(expand(pde)-pde_linear))

diff(diff(u(x, y, t), t), x)+alpha*(diff(diff(diff(diff(u(x, y, t), x), x), x), x))+beta*(diff(diff(u(x, y, t), y), y))+a*(diff(diff(u(x, y, t), x), x))+b*(diff(diff(u(x, y, t), x), y))

  

6*alpha*(diff(u(x, y, t), x))*(diff(diff(u(x, y, t), x), x))

 (17)
> 

thetai := k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+x)+eta[i]; eval(pde_linear, u(x, y, t) = 1+exp(thetai)); eq15 := isolate(%, w[i])

k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+x)+eta[i]

  

k[i]^2*w[i]*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+x)+eta[i])+alpha*k[i]^4*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+x)+eta[i])+beta*k[i]^2*l[i]^2*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+x)+eta[i])+a*k[i]^2*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+x)+eta[i])+b*k[i]^2*l[i]*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+x)+eta[i])

  

w[i] = -alpha*k[i]^2-beta*l[i]^2-b*l[i]-a

 (18)
> 

eqf := f(x, y, t) = 1+eval(exp(thetai), eq15)

f(x, y, t) = 1+exp(k[i]*((-alpha*k[i]^2-beta*l[i]^2-b*l[i]-a)*t+l[i]*y+x)+eta[i])

 (19)
> 

eq17 := u(x, y, t) = R*(diff(ln(f(x, y, t)), x))

u(x, y, t) = R*(diff(f(x, y, t), x))/f(x, y, t)

 (20)
> 

eval(eq17, eqf); simplify(eval(pde, %)); sort([solve(%, R)]); eq17 := eval(eq17, R = simplify(%[2]))

[0, 2]

  

u(x, y, t) = 2*(diff(f(x, y, t), x))/f(x, y, t)

 (21)
> 

eq19 := eval(eq17, eqf)

u(x, y, t) = 2*k[i]*exp(k[i]*((-alpha*k[i]^2-beta*l[i]^2-b*l[i]-a)*t+l[i]*y+x)+eta[i])/(1+exp(k[i]*((-alpha*k[i]^2-beta*l[i]^2-b*l[i]-a)*t+l[i]*y+x)+eta[i]))

 (22)
> 

M := eval(rhs(eq19), i = 1)

2*k[1]*exp(k[1]*(t*(-alpha*k[1]^2-beta*l[1]^2-b*l[1]-a)+y*l[1]+x)+eta[1])/(1+exp(k[1]*(t*(-alpha*k[1]^2-beta*l[1]^2-b*l[1]-a)+y*l[1]+x)+eta[1]))

 (23)
> 

simplify(eq19)

u(x, y, t) = 2*k[i]*exp(-alpha*t*k[i]^3+((-beta*l[i]^2-b*l[i]-a)*t+y*l[i]+x)*k[i]+eta[i])/(1+exp(-alpha*t*k[i]^3+((-beta*l[i]^2-b*l[i]-a)*t+y*l[i]+x)*k[i]+eta[i]))

 (24)
> 

pdetest(eq19, pde)

0

 (25)
> 

#third example which is so different and really i don't know how the author reach this point? which is diff(arctan(f),x)?
> 

NULL
> 

restart
> 

with(PDEtools)
> 

with(LinearAlgebra)
> 

NULL
> 

with(SolveTools)
> 

_local(gamma)
> 

undeclare(prime)

`There is no more prime differentiation variable; all derivatives will be displayed as indexed functions`

 (26)
> 

declare(u(x, y, z, t))

u(x, y, z, t)*`will now be displayed as`*u

 (27)
> 

declare(f(x, y, z, t))

f(x, y, z, t)*`will now be displayed as`*f

 (28)
> 

pde := diff(u(x, y, z, t), t)+6*u(x, y, z, t)^2*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x))+diff(u(x, y, z, t), `$`(x, 3))+alpha*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x))+beta*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), y))+delta*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), z))+lambda*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x, t))+mu*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), `$`(t, 2)))

diff(u(x, y, z, t), t)+6*u(x, y, z, t)^2*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x))+diff(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), x), x)+alpha*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x))+beta*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), y))+delta*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), z))+lambda*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), t), x))+mu*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), t), t))

 (29)
> 

pde_linear, pde_nonlinear := selectremove(proc (term) options operator, arrow; not has((eval(term, u(x, y, z, t) = a*u(x, y, z, t)))/a, a) end proc, expand(pde))

diff(u(x, y, z, t), t)+diff(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), x), x)+alpha*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x))+beta*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), y))+delta*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), z))+lambda*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), t), x))+mu*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), t), t)), 6*u(x, y, z, t)^2*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x))

 (30)
> 

thetai := k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i]; eval(pde_linear, u(x, y, z, t) = exp(thetai)); eq15 := isolate(%, w[i])

k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i]

  

k[i]*w[i]*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+k[i]^3*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+alpha*k[i]*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+beta*k[i]*l[i]*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+delta*k[i]*r[i]*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+lambda*k[i]^2*w[i]*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+mu*k[i]^2*w[i]^2*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])

  

w[i] = (1/2)*(-lambda*k[i]-1+(-4*beta*mu*k[i]*l[i]-4*delta*mu*k[i]*r[i]+lambda^2*k[i]^2-4*mu*k[i]^3-4*alpha*mu*k[i]+2*lambda*k[i]+1)^(1/2))/(mu*k[i])

 (31)
> 

eqf := f(x, y, z, t) = 1+eval(exp(thetai), eq15)

f(x, y, z, t) = 1+exp(k[i]*((1/2)*(-lambda*k[i]-1+(-4*beta*mu*k[i]*l[i]-4*delta*mu*k[i]*r[i]+lambda^2*k[i]^2-4*mu*k[i]^3-4*alpha*mu*k[i]+2*lambda*k[i]+1)^(1/2))*t/(mu*k[i])+l[i]*y+r[i]*z+x)+eta[i])

 (32)
> 

eq17 := u(x, y, z, t) = R*(diff(ln(f(x, y, z, t)), x))

u(x, y, z, t) = R*((diff(diff(f(x, y, z, t), y), y))/f(x, y, z, t)-(diff(f(x, y, z, t), y))^2/f(x, y, z, t)^2)

 (33)
> 

eval(eq17, eqf); simplify(eval(pde, %)); sort([solve(%, R)]); eq17 := eval(eq17, R = simplify(%[2]))


 

Download F-series.mw

Thanks for any help!

remove the rank column from my DataFrame?...

Asked by: jalal 440
dataframe tabulate
March 26 2025
1  2

Hi,

Ideas to remove the rank column (i.e., the first column displaying indices 1, 2, 3, ...) from my DataFrame?

Thanks

Q_DataFrame.mw

Maple Online Help...

Asked by: Henning Broge 10
documentation online
March 26 2025
2  0

Hi

does anyone know when Maple Online Help will be up again?

Regards

Henning

Does Maple 2025 have a dark theme yet?...

Asked by: nmacsai 260
interface color duplicate-question
March 25 2025
2  6

Does Maple 2025 have a dark theme or GUI color customization?

bug report (Maple 2024). Adding Physics:-Setup(ass...

Asked by: nm 11388
assuming odetest physics
March 25 2025
0  5

Does this happen in Maple 2025?

Why when adding Physics:-Setup(assumingusesAssume = true): now Maple gives internal exception which can not even be cought?

> 

interface(version);

`Standard Worksheet Interface, Maple 2024.2, Windows 10, October 29 2024 Build ID 1872373`

> 

Physics:-Version();

`The "Physics Updates" version in the MapleCloud is 1849 and is the same as the version installed in this computer, created 2025, March 12, 12:37 hours Pacific Time.`

> 

restart;
> 

ode:=diff(y(x),x) = (ln(y(x))^2+2*_C1)^(1/2)*y(x);
sol:=y(x) = exp((-2*_C1)^(1/2))

diff(y(x), x) = (ln(y(x))^2+2*_C1)^(1/2)*y(x)

y(x) = exp((-2*_C1)^(1/2))

> 

odetest(sol,ode) assuming positive;

-(ln(exp(I*2^(1/2)*_C1^(1/2)))^2+2*_C1)^(1/2)*exp(I*2^(1/2)*_C1^(1/2))

> 

restart;
> 

ode:=diff(y(x),x) = (ln(y(x))^2+2*_C1)^(1/2)*y(x);
sol:=y(x) = exp((-2*_C1)^(1/2)) ;

diff(y(x), x) = (ln(y(x))^2+2*_C1)^(1/2)*y(x)

y(x) = exp((-2*_C1)^(1/2))

> 

Physics:-Setup(assumingusesAssume = true):
> 

odetest(sol,ode) assuming positive;

Error, (in type/evalc/cx) too many levels of recursion

> 

restart;
> 

ode:=diff(y(x),x) = (ln(y(x))^2+2*_C1)^(1/2)*y(x);
sol:=y(x) = exp((-2*_C1)^(1/2)) ;

diff(y(x), x) = (ln(y(x))^2+2*_C1)^(1/2)*y(x)

y(x) = exp((-2*_C1)^(1/2))

> 

Physics:-Setup(assumingusesAssume = false):
> 

odetest(sol,ode) assuming positive;

-(ln(exp(I*2^(1/2)*_C1^(1/2)))^2+2*_C1)^(1/2)*exp(I*2^(1/2)*_C1^(1/2))

 

 

Download ode_test_with_physics_march_25_2025.mw

My interactive Planck Curve works in Maple 2023, b...

Asked by: erik10 791
March 25 2025
1  7

Dear Maple users

I have an Interactive Planck Curve working great in Maple 2023, but not in Maple 2024 and 2025. Can you explain why? When I drag in the Temperature slider it fails with the window: (in plottools:-getdata) range out of bounds. 

Is it a bug or has some command changed?

File attached.

Kind regards,

Erik

Planck_Curve.mw

How to resize Maple 2025 to half of the screen...

Asked by: C_R 3442
March 25 2025
2  8

Neither dragging the Maple Window to the screen edge nor Windows key & Arrow keys works on my
Windows 10 machine.

Is this only my installation?

Anything I can do get normal Windows windows behaviour back?

Maple 2025 - TextArea component ignores zoom facto...

Asked by: Anthrazit 885
embedded-components textarea
March 25 2025
1  1

I've posted this issue in the beta forum for Maple previously, but apparently this issue was never addressed, so I am going to repost it here.

Contrary to Maple 2024, components like TextArea now ignore the general view zoom factor in Maple 2025.

I'll submit it as a software change request once Maple 2025 is on the list.

Pattern Matching with Indices...

Asked by: ptjb 10
patmatch
March 25 2025
2  3

Hi all, I have recently started playing around with Maple after using Mathematica for years. I am trying to understand how to do pattern matching in Maple, and am being frustrated by the following example using indices:

patmatch(S[a],S[b::symbol])

I would expect this to evaluate to true when none of the symbols have been given other meanings, but this isn't the case. For the life of my I can't work out what I'm doing wrong, and have been unable to find an example of pattern matching with indices online. What am I missing here?

The equivalent statement using functions:

patmatch(S(a),S(b::symbol))

returns true as expected.

Many thanks in advance!

First 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Last Page 29 of 2219