445 Reputation

12 Badges

6 years, 236 days
Maple is to me difficult. The first version I bought was Maple9, and it was more than 15 years ago. But, I couldn't use it, feeling it too difficult. But, three years ago, I thought Maple might be helpful to my study, and since then, I have continued to learn Maple. As I got able to read the Maple help, I think that I could get to use maple better now than before. But, I feel that I am a beginner yet.

MaplePrimes Activity

These are questions asked by taro

In Kitonums'answer of


I read a code of remove(t->t=".", b);
t->t="." is a Boolean-valued procedure.

But, then, why does (t->t=".")(9); not return false like (t->t^2)(3); returns 9?
How can I have maple return false?

Thanks in advance.

Hello people in mapleprimes,

I have an expression, which apparently can be factored with (beta-1)

e1 := -(beta-1)*L*s*lambda*Omega^3+(beta-1)*L*s*g^k*epsilon*(T*lambda-T+1)*Omega^2+(beta-1)*L*s*(T+lambda-1)*Omega-(beta-1)*L*s*g^k*T*epsilon*lambda;

I want this expresson factored with (beta-1) but keeping other terms the same as


Is this possible?

I hope you will help me for this.

Thanks in advance.





Hello people in mapleprimes,

I hope that you will give me an answer about the calculation surrounding D.
D((x+y)^2) can be calculated with maple, but D((x+y)^a), where a is a constant, cannot at least directly.
And, I have the code, which Mr. Carl Love kindly gave me at
, which is

h:= F-> expand(evalindets(D(F)/F, specfunc(D), d-> op(d)*'h'(op(d))));

This works for (x+y)^2, but does not work for (x+y)^a.
And, I think this reason is that the behavior of D to (x+y)^2 is not the same
 as that to (x+y)^a.
And, I want to modify this code.
But, I can't .
So, I am asking this question. How should I modify the above code so that it works for (x+y)^a.
I'm so sorry for a lot of impoliteness.
I will be very glad if you give me an answer.

Take care.


Hello people in mapleprimes,
I want to collect
aa:=sigma*omega*alpha = mu(H, H)*s*omega*gamma*L+omega^(-sigma+1)*tau*mu(F, F)*s*L-omega^(-sigma+1)*tau*mu(F, F)*s*L*gamma;
with omega^(-sigma+1);

I know that the above expression could be collected with tau, which
produces the same expression as the one collected with omega^(-sigma).
And, in collecting with omega^(-sigma+1), I know that freeze-thaw could be used.

But, I want to know another way to do the same thing, using frontend or 
subsindets. Is this possible?

Thanks in advance.


Hello people in mapleprimes,
I have a question.
I appended two pictures where from the same code, two different orders of
expression appear.
How can I do for this so as not to get error messages?
The cause of this is simplify(%,symbolic) brings different order of term a__0^(-k)*F__D ahead of a parenthesis in a jpg.file and F__D*a__0^(-k) after
that parenthesis in another jpg.fine both in the line above that of  "dairihensu1."

In this case, What I can do?
Please help me.
Best wishes.



Original code is

e7_4:=F__D*(Omega+1)*beta/(beta-1) = F__I*a__D^(-k)*a__0^k+T^((sigma-k-1)/(-1+sigma))*F__D*phi^(k/(-1+sigma))+F__D;

    local b1;
  end proc;

A case without error.

A case with a error.


4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Last Page 6 of 19