taro

445 Reputation

12 Badges

6 years, 98 days
Maple is to me difficult. The first version I bought was Maple9, and it was more than 15 years ago. But, I couldn't use it, feeling it too difficult. But, three years ago, I thought Maple might be helpful to my study, and since then, I have continued to learn Maple. As I got able to read the Maple help, I think that I could get to use maple better now than before. But, I feel that I am a beginner yet.

MaplePrimes Activity


These are questions asked by taro

Hello people in maple primes

I have a question, which is about the matrix shown in http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/217852-HOW-I-Convert-Root-Of-In-To-Another-Common-Form

Why can't C below be shown with beta?

A := Matrix(3, 3, [[-a, a, 0], [0, 0, -sqrt(l*b*c*(j+k))/(j+k)], [2*j*sqrt(l*b*c*(j+k))/((j+k)*l), 2*k*sqrt(l*b*c*(j+k))/((j+k)*l), -c]]);
B:=subs(l*b*c*(j+k)=alpha,A);
C:=subs(j*alpha^(1/2) = beta,B);
e:=subs(alpha^(1/2) = gamma,B);

Best wishes.

taro

 

 

Hello people in mapleprimes,

I have a question:
What are you doing when you use maple in calculating, for example, your paper,
to avoid missing, for example, variables you use, or for your needs to look back the outcomes you obtained before?
If this is a paper-using work, on considering what to do next, you will read some pieces of papers you wrote and
on which you had calculated and obtained necessary equations. But, with small monitor 13 inch, and with
inconvenience of dealing with things in PC, compared with papers, I feel some stress in using maple in writing a paper.
So, now, I am asking you what kind of methods you has devised to make what you are writing compact and easy,
for you to handle with what you are writing.

I know surely that there are the document block, which enables output or input to not be shown, the workbook,
which is helpful in putting attached worksheets or jpg files together at one workbook, and the distinction of ":" and ";",
which in the case of the former, hides expressions in the outcome.

But, yet, I want to ask you about the ways you use to make it easy to write something.
If you have some, I will be very glad if you show it here.

Best wishes.

taro

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hello people in Mapleprimes,

 

I have an expression which I want to modify with another equation.

They are simple, and looks easy to simplify.

nb:=(k-sigma+1)*lambda*L*(gamma*upsilon-delta__1122^k*tau)*upsilon*tau*v/(f__F*sigma*(-tau^2+upsilon^2)*k);

hh := (L*lambda*(k-sigma+1)*upsilon*tau*v)/(f__F*sigma*(-tau^2+upsilon^2)*k)=rho;

 

I want to express nb with hh as

(gamma*upsilon-delta__1122^k*tau)*rho;

With the next code, that modification can be done.

isolate(hh,f__F);subs(%,nb);simplify(%);

But, this isolates hh for f__F, which does not look intuitive.

On the other hand, the outcome of the substitution looks so simple, which you find with executing  the codes of

nb, and hh.

But, algsubs, and subs, and simplify/siderel won't work properly.

 

What I want to ask is this. Isn't there any nice way to substitute hh into nb other than isolating f__F, so that the result is expressed with rho?

 

I will be very glad if you will give me answers.

 

Best wishes.

taro

 

 

 

 

Hello people in mapleprimes,

I think that I found a bug.

Using the screen opened with command + f, I tried to find a v__1211 in the file I appended here.

But, when the cursor is trapped on an output part, which is a blue part, maple wouldn't continue to find the next

v__1211 anymore even if I clicked the Find Next on the screen.

If I move the cursol one line below with a hand, the Find Next butttons works again, but it is intricate.

Isn't there any good way to avoid this trouble other than not using double _, that is __.?

I hope you will give me some hint.

taro

v_1211.mw

P.S. I clicked the above link and opened that file with maple. Then, the notification telling that this is read-only file and

you cannot save this file after some modification, appeared. I don't know whether there is any problem. 

Does appending a maple file on a post on this mapleprimes always done in such a way? 

Hello people in Mapleprimes,

I want to factor

g^((2*(-sigma+k+1))/(-1+sigma))-tau^2

as

(g^((-sigma+k+1)/(-1+sigma)) -tau)*(g^((-sigma+k+1)/(-1+sigma))+tau);

 

I know that the following code works:

subs(g^((2*(-sigma+k+1))/(-1+sigma))=(g^((-sigma+k+1)/(-1+sigma)))^2,g^((2*(-sigma+k+1))/(-1+sigma))-tau^2);

factor(%);

 

Isn't there another better way than this?

I will be very glad if you teach me about this.

Thanks in advance.

taro

First 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Last Page 8 of 19