495 Reputation

12 Badges

10 years, 237 days
Maple is to me difficult. The first version I bought was Maple9, and it was more than 15 years ago. But, I couldn't use it, feeling it too difficult. But, three years ago, I thought Maple might be helpful to my study, and since then, I have continued to learn Maple. As I got able to read the Maple help, I think that I could get to use maple better now than before. But, I feel that I am a beginner yet.

MaplePrimes Activity

These are questions asked by taro

Hello people in mapleprimes,

I want to know some way, if there is, to do the modification of the following, that is

The original expression: (beta*L__1/P)^beta*((1-beta)*L__1)^(1-beta)
The expression after modification: beta^beta*L__1*(1/P)^beta*(1-beta)^(1-beta)

I did this with freezing (1-beta) in (1-beta)*L__1.
But, this is a little long code. I will be glad if you tell me some more simple way to do this.

Thanks in advance.




Hello people in mapleprimes,

I have a problem about map.


The output of this code is not y*z/x, but  (x*y*z)^(-y*z).

I can't understand why this occurs.
Can't you teach me about this?

Thanks in advance.


Hello People in mapleprimes,


would not be simplifyed to k*a^(k-1)/a__0^k


symplify(a^k*k/(a*a__0^k)) assuming(k>1);

or other commands including expand.

Is there any way other than simplify(numer(..)/a)/simplify(denom(..)/a); ?

Thanks in advance.


Hello people in mapleprimes

I asked a question for a similar thing before.

The question I had then is not solved yet in my mind, so I think  I will ask you
again. It is about differentiation of a composite function.



For both e and d, the notation of D__1 and D__2 appear.
And, even if, with convert, I changed them to another form,
what I can get is more complicated form of h.

Is it inevitable to use D__1 and D__2 brabra in the differentiation of
composite function?

I am writing this question thinking that if there is a way of go around it,
 I want to know.

And, though this is the second question, even if I use latex( ) command,
natually, codes of Tex I can get is that of the output shown on the screen, including D__1 and D__2, even though I want it to be shown with f__x and f__y or that including prime. Then, I have to edit that tex file, changing D__1 to f__x etc. which I think is very complicated modification of the text file.
I wish there is a way to modify it in Maple so as it to be direct TeX codes which  do not require me to modify.
Is it impossible to do such a thing?

Thanks in advance.


Hello people in mapleprimes,

I hope you will help me about modifying an expression.

How can I factor the expression with w and Delta__1 in the attached file?

e2_3 := w^(1-sigma)*((f__11*sigma*Delta__1/L__1)^(-1/(sigma-1))/w)^(k-sigma+1)*k/(Delta__1*(k-sigma+1)*a__0^k);

Thank you for advance.


2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Last Page 4 of 20