The following three commands 

plots:-implicitplot(3*cos(x) = tan(y)^3, x = -Pi .. Pi, y = -(1/2)*Pi-1 .. (1/2)*Pi+1, thickness = 3, crossingrefine = 1, rational = true, signchange = true, resolution = 1000, gridrefine = 2);
plots:-implicitplot(3*cos(x) = tan(y)^3, x = -Pi .. Pi, y = -(1/2)*Pi-1 .. (1/2)*Pi+1, thickness = 3, crossingrefine = 1, rational = true, signchange = false, resolution = 1000, gridrefine = 2);
plots:-implicitplot(3*cos(x) = tan(y)^3, x = -Pi .. Pi, y = -(1/2)*Pi-1 .. (1/2)*Pi+1, thickness = 3, crossingrefine = 1, rational = true, resolution = 1000, gridrefine = 2);

produce the same incorrect plot 

It is clear the sraight lines given by y=Pi/2 and y=-Pi/2 are superfluous. It should be noticed that the Mmma's ContourPlot command without any options produces a correct plot.

Hi, I'm trying to use Maple to construct some examples of symmetry solutions for certain nonlinear PDE's.  As a warm up, however, I'm working through the commands just for the heat equation in 3d: u[t]-u[x,x]-u[y,y]-u[z,z]=0 

I've gotten Maple to produce both determining equations for the symmetry infinitesimal generators via the DeterminingPDE command.  I've also gotten the command Infinitesimals to work too.

However, when I next use PDETools Invariants command, it correctly outputs invariants for most of the generator output of Infinitesimals EXCEPT it won't output anything for the simple rotation generators yd[x]-xd[y].  It will, however, output invariants if the rotation is between an independent and the dependent coordinate.

An example:
with(PDETools)
S:=[_xi[x]=y, _xi[y]=-x, _eta[u]=0]
Invariants(S,u(x,y))

*Above returns nothing, But if you instead have _xi[x]=x and _xi[y]=y then it returns the right invariants.

Thanks in advance!

Up to http://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/Maple/view.aspx?path=solve&term=solve

 Let us consider 

solve({x > -Pi, (tan(x)-tan(x)^2)^2-cos(x+4*tan(x)) = -1, x < Pi}, [x]);
                               []

We see the command omits the solution x=0 without any warning. It should be noticed that Mathematica solves it, outputting

{{x -> 0}, {x -> 0}}

and the warning

Solve::incs: Warning: Solve was unable to prove that the solution set found is complete.

One may draw a conclusion on her/his own.

Hey, this is not the I've had this encounter. I want to open this saved document but when I open it and Maple starts up it just hits me with "A problem was encountered while opening the workbook. Database is not opened". How can I get to open it properly and see my math notes?

How can this be prevented?

When I try to upload the file in this message it says "Cant open a null file"

Any help?

Jacob

In manual solution is no problem, but i am interest to compute it with any software such maple since i am not familiar, How to find solution in term of parametric equation a(r), b(r), c(r) for r=-5..5 and also visualize this three derivative condition? d(a)=a+b+c, d(b)=a-b+c, d(c)=a-b-c

Does anyone know how to take a Maple plot and convert it to FITS format?  FITS is commonly used in astronomical images and stands for Flexible Image Transport System.

Thank you very much !

Hey, I recently switched to Maple 2016, but now whenever I write equations in the text field it calculates it like if it was a math problem it had to solve, but I just want it to be text, nothing else.

Do you know of any way to turn this off? As in Maple 2015 I could write equations in the text field, and when I ran the worksheet through it wouldn't try to calculate text fields, but 2016 calculates the text fields and shows the solution as a blue text... So annoying.

If I was to project a squared profile onto a cylinder. Would mable be able to help me calculating the area that is projected onto the cylinder?

Since the cylinder walls are curved I assume that the are projected on to the curved surface which is the wass of the cylinder is bigger then side*side.

In the link I tried to sketch the "problem" the red square represent the area I want to project onto the cylinder.

https://i.gyazo.com/4113ad5255385b438c8872941e14baf1.png

Thanks

Hello,

I want to use Maple from a good text-editor. I heard about EMACS and MapleV.

I have installed Maple 18 (windows 10) and GNU Emacs 25.1.1 (x86_64-w64-mingw32) and Joe Riels mapleV Emacs Mode 2.33. I tried to follow all steps in the Install-Dokumentation  doc/maplev.html#Installation, I failed at A.1 Emacs Files.

My Emacs lisp files located at:  

Byte-compile them from Emacs with the command

gives the result:

With the Syntax without leading point (as in documentation)

gives the result:

Who knows, whats wrong? I've never used Emacs before.

Hello,

my problem is, that the time or profiling results are not fine enough.

For example time is only measureable in a 16ms step on my system. Is there any way to measure time more fine, perhaps in a 1ms step or nanoseconds?

Hello everybody,

I develop a simulator of dynamical systems governed by ODE systems.
Thanks to intensive upstream testing I have already identified some "methods" that work well on some classes of systems and poorly for some others (here "method" is intented in the sense of dsolve(..., numeric, method=...)), but it is rather difficult to know in advance if method A will perform well or not, or if method B could be better ...
This is very classical.

On the other side, people this simulator is designed for, do not want to use directly MAPLE to  choose a method among all those it proposes,nor to adjust the many parameters some methods can have

The idea I have in mind is to facilitate their choice by developing a specific Maplet. This Maplet could take as a model the pane dsolve[interactive]() opens when you select the numerical solving strategy.
As far as possible I would like to customize this pane for it be closer to our own needs (specific options sholud be proposed as well as personal help pages)

So my questions:

1/  Is the corresponding code avaliable (I failed to find it while using showstat) ?
1'/ Incidentally, even if this simulator is designed for internal purposes alone, is there some kind of copyright or usage limitations of the code above ?
2/ Is it possible to obtain the list of all the avaliable methods (euler, rk4, gear, ...) without without constructing it manually ?
3/ Once a method is choosen, is it possible to obtain the list of all its options (here again without without constructing it manually) ?

Maybe a quite unusual request on this site but I would greatly appreciate any answer

Thanks in advance

Hi,

I want to solve 2 linear equations in p[1] and p[2] 

eq3 = -(1/8)*(x^2+y^2+((x^2+y^2)^2+2*(omega[1]-omega[2])*(x^2-y^2)+(omega[1]-omega[2])^2)^(1/2)+omega[1]-omega[2])*(x^2*p[1]+2*x*y*p[2]-y^2*p[1]-((x^2+y^2)^2+2*(omega[1]-omega[2])*(x^2-y^2)+(omega[1]-omega[2])^2)^(1/2)*p[1]+omega[1]*p[1]-omega[2]*p[1])/(y^2*x*(omega[1]-omega[2])) - P[1];
eq4 = -(1/8)*(x^2*p[1]+2*x*y*p[2]-y^2*p[1]+((x^2+y^2)^2+2*(omega[1]-omega[2])*(x^2-y^2)+(omega[1]-omega[2])^2)^(1/2)*p[1]+omega[1]*p[1]-omega[2]*p[1])*(x^2+y^2-((x^2+y^2)^2+2*(omega[1]-omega[2])*(x^2-y^2)+(omega[1]-omega[2])^2)^(1/2)+omega[1]-omega[2])/(y^2*(omega[1]-omega[2])*x) - P[2]

solve({eq3,eq4},{p[1],p[2]});

I don't receive any answer. Why?

plz code and sole that this integral!!!!!!!!!!

!!!

Hello people in mapleprimes,

I hope that you will give me an answer about the calculation surrounding D.
D((x+y)^2) can be calculated with maple, but D((x+y)^a), where a is a constant, cannot at least directly.
And, I have the code, which Mr. Carl Love kindly gave me at
http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/218045-Logarithmic-Derivative
, which is

h:= F-> expand(evalindets(D(F)/F, specfunc(D), d-> op(d)*'h'(op(d))));

This works for (x+y)^2, but does not work for (x+y)^a.
And, I think this reason is that the behavior of D to (x+y)^2 is not the same
 as that to (x+y)^a.
And, I want to modify this code.
But, I can't .
So, I am asking this question. How should I modify the above code so that it works for (x+y)^a.
I'm so sorry for a lot of impoliteness.
I will be very glad if you give me an answer.

Take care.

taro