sand15

485 Reputation

2 Badges

4 years, 203 days

MaplePrimes Activity


These are questions asked by sand15

Hi,

I have some trouble using the GlobalOprimization Toolbox (GoT)
When used with some options GoT returns an error message indicating the option is not valid.
For instance options (just a few among some others) "numexperiments", "nugget", "optsearch", "goal", ... are not recognized.

I'm using Maple 2018.0 (I don't know how to recover the number of the GlobalOptimization Toolbox).

Is it an installation problem (GotT has been bought legally) or a problem with this Toolbox ?

TIA

Hi,

I do not really understand the difference between annrow operator and unapply.
From the help pages it seems that unapply "creates" an arrow operator and thus that they could be two different ways to do the same thing.


restart:

f := x[1]+y[1]:

a := indets(f):                  # just because f can be more complex than the f above
g := (op(a)) -> f;              # generates an error, "operators not of a symbol type"
h := unapply(f, (op(a)))   # ok, but with a strange output
     h := (x__1, y__1) -> x__1+y__1

So it seems that Maple has transform by itself the indexed x[1] and y[1] into symbols x__1 and y__1.

Could you explain me what happened exactly ?

TIA

Hi,

The help page TimeSeriesAnalysis, ExponentialSmoothingModel contains an error.
The command that generates the output (7) should be
esm2 := ExponentialSmoothingModel(seasonal={"A","M"},constraints=admissible)
instead of
esm2 := ExponentialSmoothingModel(seasonal={A,M},constraints=admissible)

PS : there is no tag relative to TimeSeriesAnalysys

Hi,

When multiple request to DocumentTools:-Tabulate(...) are enclosed in the same group of commands (which typically happens when they are within a procedure), only the last one is displayed.
Is it possible to overcome this behaviour?

Thanks in advance

I discovered incidentally that the command  Matrix(3, 3, `-`) (the number 3 is purely illustrative) returned the same result than the command Matrix(3, 3, (i,j) -> i-j).
In the same way `+` realizes (i,j) -> i+j), `*` realizes (i,j) -> i*j), ...

More surprisingly `.` realizes (i,j) -> i*j while I'm in worksheet mode, with "old" maple input style, and that the command 2.3 does not answer 6 but concatenates 2 and 3.

Is this a known behaviour or an undocumented feature?

 

 

 

 

 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Last Page 1 of 15