For years I used to use 2 accounts when I am home

• one under Firefox corresponds to my profesionnal account, which I can access to from my office oror home (and which is the one I use here),
• the other one under Safari is my "personal" account; (login mmcdara)  which I cannot access to from my office because of security rules.
   

To separate the managing of professional and personal accounts I always used the former under Firefox and the latter under Safari.
Since the outage my personal account is no longer accessible, neither from Safari nor Firefox.

I created this account about eight years ago using the adress michael.mcdara@gmail.com and during all these years the connexion to Mapleprimes from Safari was  "automatic" in the sense that I was always logged in as mmcdara. Even after having quit Safari or shut down my computer, I was logged in as mmcdara as soon as I reopened Mapleprimes (a curiosity, for quitting Firefox being logged in as sand15 and openening it again required my relogging as sand15).

This still was the case early this morning (I sent replied to andiguy) but not one hour after.
Indeed Mapleprimes asked me my mail adress, that I knew, and my password, that I have forgot, of course.

Eight years ago the double authentification was not mandatory and so Gmail has purely and simply made the adress michael.mcdara@gmail.com inaccesible in between (I used it only with Mapleprimes, thus no real need to look at it regularly nor to bother with this double authentification stuff... at least I thought).
So any attempt to ask for a reinitialization of my password is a dead end for I cannot access the address michael.mcdara@gmail.com

My main activity on Mapleprimes is realized using my mmcdara account.
What bothers me the most  (loosing my mmcdara account would be unplesant but I can survive this) is that I was working since several months on two or three posts and that I can't anymore access the corresponding drafts (not a deadly situation I cannot survive to neither).

Do you have any idea about how to solve these issues?
I would satisfy myself recovering the two or three post drafts I was working on.

Thanks in advance
 

I recently watched a video in which the speaker asked the following question: "How many seconds are there in 42 days?".
I think I've done what anyone would do: trying to quickly find an order of magnitude for this number.
But the speaker's answer was both remarkable and obvious when you think of it: "Exactly 10! seconds".

So my question: Given the number 3628800, is there a way to identify it (in the  identify's sense) to 10!  ?
Or maybe some trick to force identify to answer 10! ?

Thanks in advance

While answering a question on this site I accidentally met expressions of the form binomial(n, min(n, r)+1) where both n and r are positive integers and n is strictly lower than r.

For the record the common definition of the binomial coefficient binomial(n, k) is based on the double inequality 0 <= k <= n  and the only generalized definition where k could be larger than n I know of is the NegativeBinomial distribution where we use
binomial(-n, k) which, with 0 <= k <= n  again makes the first operator lower than the second.

I tried to understand how Maple does this

binomial(n, min(n, r)+1) assuming n < r,  n::posint
                               0

(more generallyn, for any strictly positive integer p, binomial(n, min(n, r)+p) = 0 under the assumptions above)

I guess that the explanationrelies upon what I did to get the output (2) in the attached file.
Can you confirm/infirm this and, as I wasn't capable to find any clue in help(binomial), [Maple 2015], if the way maple computes
these results is documented elsewhere.

Thanks in advence.

Download binomial.mw

When there are print commands in a loop their content is printed as soon as this command is executed.
This is not the case with printf whose displays are delayed (buffered?).
Is there a way to force the display of printf when the command is executed?

TIA

Motivation: I want to display intermediate execution times in a prettier way than print offers.

Is it possible to enlarge the sliders in Explore(plot(...), ...) and increase their "resolution" (meaning to have a higher precision when the slider is moved)?
If Maple does offer this option, could you tell me from what version this is the case

TIA